• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创水力技术同期非潜入式植入物植入行鼻窦增大术。

Sinus Augmentation with Simultaneous, Non-Submerged, Implant Placement Using a Minimally Invasive Hydraulic Technique.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology and Implant Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Feb 13;56(2):75. doi: 10.3390/medicina56020075.

DOI:10.3390/medicina56020075
PMID:32069970
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7074246/
Abstract

To evaluate whether sinus augmentation, using a minimally invasive implant device, via a non-submerged surgical approach, might negatively influence the outcome. A retrospective cohort study was conducted by evaluating patients' files, classifying them into two groups. Fifty patients (22 men 28 women) were included in the study, 25 in each group. The use of an implant device based on residual alveolar ridge height for sinus augmentation, radiographic evaluation, insertion torque, membrane perforation, post-operative healing, and a minimum of 12 months follow-up were evaluated. The mean residual alveolar ridge height was 5.4 mm for the non-submerged group and 4.2 mm for the submerged group. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications (including membrane perforations). The mean insertion torque was 45 N/cm for the study group and 20 N/cm for the control group. Complete soft tissue healing was observed within three weeks. Mean bone gain height was 8 mm for the study and 9.3 mm for the control group. All implants osseointegrated after 6-9 months of healing time. Mean follow-up was 17.5 months, range 12-36 months. Marginal bone loss at last follow-up was not statistically significantly different: 1 mm in the non-submerged vs. 1.2 mm in the submerged group. Submerged and non-submerged healing following maxillary sinus augmentation was comparable provided residual alveolar ridge height >5 mm and insertion torque >25 N/cm.

摘要

为了评估使用微创植入物设备通过非淹没手术方法进行鼻窦提升是否会对结果产生负面影响。通过评估患者的档案,进行了一项回顾性队列研究,将患者分为两组。该研究纳入了 50 名患者(22 名男性,28 名女性),每组 25 名。评估了基于剩余牙槽嵴高度的植入物设备在鼻窦提升中的使用、影像学评估、插入扭矩、膜穿孔、术后愈合以及至少 12 个月的随访情况。非淹没组的平均剩余牙槽嵴高度为 5.4 毫米,淹没组为 4.2 毫米。术中或术后均无并发症(包括膜穿孔)。研究组的平均插入扭矩为 45 N/cm,对照组为 20 N/cm。在三周内观察到完全的软组织愈合。研究组的平均骨增量高度为 8 毫米,对照组为 9.3 毫米。所有植入物在 6-9 个月的愈合时间后均实现了骨整合。平均随访时间为 17.5 个月,范围为 12-36 个月。最后一次随访时,边缘骨丢失无统计学差异:非淹没组为 1 毫米,淹没组为 1.2 毫米。如果剩余牙槽嵴高度>5 毫米且插入扭矩>25 N/cm,则上颌窦提升后的淹没和非淹没愈合情况相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/c8e96782d1c7/medicina-56-00075-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/38eff32e3648/medicina-56-00075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/989ab98b9717/medicina-56-00075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/e82b09fbf9d2/medicina-56-00075-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/4ca22f3da8d1/medicina-56-00075-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/d51965bd1b7f/medicina-56-00075-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/7c7b42b536d4/medicina-56-00075-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/c8e96782d1c7/medicina-56-00075-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/38eff32e3648/medicina-56-00075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/989ab98b9717/medicina-56-00075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/e82b09fbf9d2/medicina-56-00075-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/4ca22f3da8d1/medicina-56-00075-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/d51965bd1b7f/medicina-56-00075-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/7c7b42b536d4/medicina-56-00075-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a882/7074246/c8e96782d1c7/medicina-56-00075-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Sinus Augmentation with Simultaneous, Non-Submerged, Implant Placement Using a Minimally Invasive Hydraulic Technique.微创水力技术同期非潜入式植入物植入行鼻窦增大术。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Feb 13;56(2):75. doi: 10.3390/medicina56020075.
2
Crestal sinus lift using an implant with an internal L-shaped channel: 1-year after loading results from a prospective cohort study.使用带有内部L形通道种植体的牙槽嵴窦底提升术:前瞻性队列研究的1年加载后结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(3):325-336.
3
Minimally invasive transcrestal guided sinus lift (TGSL): a clinical prospective proof-of-concept cohort study up to 52 months.微创经嵴引导上颌窦提升术(TGSL):一项长达52个月的临床前瞻性概念验证队列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Aug;16(4):582-93. doi: 10.1111/cid.12034. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
4
A novel implant system dedicate to hydraulic Schneiderian membrane elevation and simultaneously bone graft augmentation: An up-to 45 months retrospective clinical study.一种专门用于水压性上颌窦黏膜提升并同时进行骨增量的新型种植系统:一项长达45个月的回顾性临床研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Aug;44(8):1089-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
Minimally invasive sinus lift implant device: a multicenter safety and efficacy trial preliminary results.微创鼻窦提升种植体装置:一项多中心安全性和有效性试验的初步结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Aug;16(4):520-6. doi: 10.1111/cid.12021. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
6
Minimally Invasive Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using a Dedicated Hydraulic Sinus Lift Implant Device: A Prospective Case Series Study on Clinical, Radiologic, and Patient-Centered Outcomes.使用专用液压鼻窦提升种植体装置的微创鼻窦增高术:一项关于临床、放射学及以患者为中心结局的前瞻性病例系列研究
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;37(1):125-135. doi: 10.11607/prd.2914.
7
Comparison of 4 sinus augmentation techniques for implant placement with residual alveolar bone height ≤3 mm.针对剩余牙槽骨高度≤3毫米的种植体植入,4种窦底提升技术的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 13;99(46):e23180. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023180.
8
Radiographic analysis of a transalveolar sinus-lift technique: a multipractice retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years.经牙槽窦提升技术的放射分析:一项多实践回顾性研究,平均随访时间为 5 年。
J Periodontol. 2013 Aug;84(8):1039-47. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.100684.
9
Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation Using a Special Drilling System and Hydraulic Pressure: A 2-Year Prospective Cohort Study.使用特殊钻孔系统和液压进行上颌窦膜提升:一项为期2年的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;38(4):593-599. doi: 10.11607/prd.3403.
10
A clinical and radiographic case series of implants placed with the simplified minimally invasive antral membrane elevation technique in the posterior maxilla.一组关于采用简化微创上颌窦膜提升技术在上颌后部植入种植体的临床和影像学病例系列。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;42(8):1942-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of guided lateral maxillary sinus lift procedure with simultaneous implant placement using stereolithographic surgical guide: a randomized controlled clinical study.使用立体光刻手术导板评估引导式上颌窦外侧提升术同期种植体植入:一项随机对照临床研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 May 17;29(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01399-3.
2
Schneiderian membrane perforation repair using a crosslinked collagen membrane: a retrospective cohort study.使用交联胶原膜修复上颌窦黏膜穿孔:一项回顾性队列研究。
Head Face Med. 2025 Feb 27;21(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00487-9.
3
The Impact of Sinus Anatomy on Early Implant Failure Following Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Crestal Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Hydraulic Pressure and Vibrations: A Retrospective Single Cohort Study.使用液压和振动进行牙槽嵴窦底增高术:一项回顾性单队列研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):1149-1154. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6478.
2
Intrasinus Bone Gain with the Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Technique: A Review of the Literature.骨凿上颌窦底提升技术的窦内骨增量:文献综述
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):995-1002. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6334.
3
Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation Using a Special Drilling System and Hydraulic Pressure: A 2-Year Prospective Cohort Study.
鼻窦解剖结构对鼻窦增高术后早期种植体失败的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):984-991. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.10.009. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
4
Minimally Invasive Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review.微创鼻窦增高术:一项系统评价
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13403. doi: 10.1111/cid.13403. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
5
Early tissue and healing responses after maxillary sinus augmentation using horizontal platelet rich fibrin bone blocks.上颌窦提升术后使用水平富血小板纤维蛋白骨块的早期组织和愈合反应。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03228-z.
6
Outcomes Following Hydraulic Pressure Indirect Sinus Lift in Cases of Simultaneous Implant Placement With Platelet-Rich Fibrin.在同时植入富含血小板纤维蛋白的情况下进行液压间接窦提升后的结果。
Cureus. 2022 Aug 16;14(8):e28087. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28087. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Effect of Sinus Floor Augmentation with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Allogeneic Bone Graft on Stability of One-Stage Dental Implants: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.富血小板纤维蛋白与同种异体骨移植对一期种植体稳定性的影响:一项随机对照的分侧临床研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 4;19(15):9569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159569.
8
Management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during maxillary sinus floor augmentation with lateral approach in relation to subsequent implant survival rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.采用外侧径路行上颌窦底提升术中处理鼻中隔穿孔对后续种植体存留率的影响:系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 12;7(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00346-7.
9
Two-stage transcrestal sinus floor elevation-insight into replantation: Six case reports.两阶段经牙槽嵴窦底提升术——再植的见解:六例病例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Apr 6;9(10):2386-2393. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i10.2386.
使用特殊钻孔系统和液压进行上颌窦膜提升:一项为期2年的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;38(4):593-599. doi: 10.11607/prd.3403.
4
Early and late implant failure of submerged versus non-submerged implant healing: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.早期和晚期种植体失败:淹没式和非淹没式种植体愈合的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 May;45(5):613-623. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12890.
5
The Feasibility of Flapless Approach to Sinus Augmentation Using an Implant Device Designed According to Residual Alveolar Ridge Height.使用根据剩余牙槽嵴高度设计的种植体装置进行无瓣上颌窦提升术的可行性
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 July/August;38(4):601–606. doi: 10.11607/prd.2950. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
A novel implant system dedicate to hydraulic Schneiderian membrane elevation and simultaneously bone graft augmentation: An up-to 45 months retrospective clinical study.一种专门用于水压性上颌窦黏膜提升并同时进行骨增量的新型种植系统:一项长达45个月的回顾性临床研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Aug;44(8):1089-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
In Vivo Evaluation of Two-Piece Implants Placed Following One-Stage and Two-Stage Surgical Protocol in Posterior Mandibular Region. Assessment of Alterations in Crestal Bone Level.在下颌后牙区按照一期和二期手术方案植入两件式种植体的体内评估。牙槽嵴骨水平变化的评估。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17(5):854-61. doi: 10.1111/cid.12186. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
8
Maxillary Sinus Grafting with Autograft Versus Fresh-Frozen Allograft: A Split-Mouth Evaluation of Bone Volume Dynamics.自体骨移植与新鲜冷冻同种异体骨移植在上颌窦植骨中的应用:骨量动态变化的双侧对照评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):1137-42. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3924.
9
A Comparative Study of Clinical Parameters in Submerged and Non submerged Implants.潜入式与非潜入式种植体临床参数的比较研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZC26-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11317.5653. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
10
A simplified approach to the minimally invasive antral membrane elevation technique utilizing a viscoelastic medium for hydraulic sinus floor elevation.一种利用粘弹性介质进行水压性上颌窦底提升的微创上颌窦膜提升技术的简化方法。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;19(1):97-101. doi: 10.1007/s10006-014-0473-2. Epub 2014 Nov 18.