Laboratory of Psychiatric Neuroscience, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Douglas, Australia.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia.
Stress. 2020 Sep;23(5):509-518. doi: 10.1080/10253890.2020.1732346. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
The aim of this narrative review was to demonstrate how the notion of allostatic load (AL) relates directly to the mental health disparities observed between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. We also endeavored to synthesize the results of the limited number of studies examining stress and AL in Indigenous Australians in order to explore the potential public health benefits of the AL concept. A range of literature examining health inequalities, psychosocial determinants of mental illness and AL was explored to demonstrate the applicability of stress biology to the significant mental health burden faced by Indigenous Australians. Furthermore, all original studies indexed in MEDLINE that provided quantitative data on primary stress biomarkers in Indigenous Australians were selected for review. Evidence of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation and increased AL is apparent even in the handful of studies examining stress biomarkers in Indigenous Australians. Urinary, salivary, hair and fingernail cortisol, hair cortisone, urinary epinephrine, heart rate variability and the cortisol awakening response are all AL parameters which have been shown to be dysregulated in Indigenous Australian cohorts. Furthermore, associations between some of these biomarkers, self-perceived discrimination, exposure to stressful life events and symptoms of psychiatric disorders in Indigenous Australians have also been demonstrated. The continued assessment of AL biomarkers and their relationship with past traumas, lifetime stressors and socio-economic factors amongst Indigenous Australians is important to addressing the mental health this population. Measurement of AL biomarkers in a culturally appropriate manner may lead to more targeted preventative measures, interventions and policies, which mitigate the effects of stress at both the individual and societal level.
本叙述性综述的目的是展示适应负荷(AL)的概念如何直接与澳大利亚原住民和非原住民之间观察到的心理健康差距相关。我们还努力综合了为数不多的研究压力和澳大利亚原住民 AL 的结果,以探索 AL 概念的潜在公共卫生益处。研究了一系列检查健康不平等、精神疾病的心理社会决定因素和 AL 的文献,以展示压力生物学对澳大利亚原住民面临的重大精神健康负担的适用性。此外,选择了在 MEDLINE 中索引的所有提供澳大利亚原住民主要应激生物标志物定量数据的原始研究进行综述。即使在少数检查澳大利亚原住民应激生物标志物的研究中,也明显存在下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴失调和 AL 增加的证据。尿液、唾液、头发和指甲皮质醇、头发皮质酮、尿液肾上腺素、心率变异性和皮质醇觉醒反应都是已经在澳大利亚原住民队列中显示失调的 AL 参数。此外,还证明了这些生物标志物中的一些与自我感知的歧视、经历压力生活事件和澳大利亚原住民精神障碍症状之间存在关联。继续评估 AL 生物标志物及其与过去创伤、终生压力源和社会经济因素之间的关系,对于解决这一人群的心理健康问题非常重要。以文化上适当的方式测量 AL 生物标志物可能会导致更有针对性的预防措施、干预措施和政策,从而减轻个体和社会层面的压力影响。