Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2020 Feb 18;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13722-020-00185-8.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a web-based treatment program with therapist guidance for adults and adolescents with regular cannabis use from the general population.
A double blinded randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design was conducted (intervention group n = 151, wait-list control group n = 152). Follow-up 12 weeks from treatment commencement of a 13-module intervention. The primary outcome was frequency of cannabis use. Time by group interaction effects were modeled using generalized estimated equations and the instrumental variable approach was used to estimate the effect of intervention adherence.
At follow-up, the intention to treat (ITT) analyses did not show any significant time by group effects. A significant association between intervention adherence and scores on the cannabis abuse screening test (CAST) was found. Secondary analysis excluding participants who had received other professional help revealed time by group effects for secondary outcomes gram cannabis consumed past week, number of dependency criteria and CAST score. Due to methodological limitations, these latter results should be interpreted with caution.
In this study we did not find a web-based treatment program with therapist guidance to be more effective than a waiting-list in reducing frequency of cannabis use. Trial registration The trial was pre-registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02408640) April 3, 2015.
本研究旨在调查针对普通人群中具有规律大麻使用习惯的成年人和青少年,提供基于网络的治疗项目并辅以治疗师指导的效果。
本研究采用了一项双盲随机对照试验(实验组 n=151,等待名单对照组 n=152),采用平行组设计。在治疗开始后 12 周进行随访,共包括 13 个模块的干预。主要结局指标是大麻使用频率。使用广义估计方程对时间与分组的交互效应进行建模,并采用工具变量法来估计干预依从性的效果。
意向治疗(ITT)分析在随访时未显示出任何时间与分组的显著交互效应。干预依从性与大麻滥用筛查测试(CAST)得分之间存在显著关联。对排除接受其他专业帮助的参与者进行二次分析显示,对于次要结局,包括过去一周内摄入的大麻克数、依赖标准数量和 CAST 得分,存在时间与分组的交互效应。由于方法学上的限制,这些结果应谨慎解释。
在本研究中,我们发现基于网络的治疗项目并辅以治疗师指导与等待名单相比,并没有更有效地减少大麻使用频率。
该试验于 2015 年 4 月 3 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02408640)进行了预先注册。