Sampaio Gêisa-Aiane-de Morais, de Meneses Izaura-Helena-Chaves, de Carvalho Fabiola-Galbiatti, Carlo Hugo-Lemes, Münchow Eliseu-Aldrighi, Barbosa Taís-de Souza, Pithon Matheus-Melo, Alves Polliana-Muniz, Lacerda-Santos Rogério
DDS. M.Sc. Department of Clinical and Social Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
DDS., M.Sc., Ph.D. Professor. Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of de Fora, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Feb 1;12(2):e178-e186. doi: 10.4317/jced.56308. eCollection 2020 Feb.
The focus of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial, mechanical properties and biocompatibility of glass ionomer (GICs) modified by Chlorhexidine (CHX).
For biocompatibility, 105 male Wistar rats were used, divided into 7 groups (n=15): Group C (Control,Polyethylene), Groups M, M10, M18, and Groups RL, RL10, RL18 (M-Meron and RL-Riva Luting: conventional, and modified with 10%, and 18% CHX, respectively). The tissues were analyzed under optical microscope for different cellular events and time intervals. Antibacterial effect and Shear Bond Strength Test (SBST) were also analyzed. Biocompatibility was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests; SBST one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (<0.05). For the antibacterial effect, the Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman, followed by Dunn (<0.05) tests were used.
Morphological study of the tissues showed inflammatory infiltrate with significant differences between Groups C and RL18, in the time intervals of 7(=0.013) and 15(=0.032) days. The antimicrobial effects of the cements was shown to be CHX concentration-dependent (=0.001). The SBST showed no significant difference between the Groups of Meron cement (P=0.385), however, there was difference between Group RL and Groups RL10 and RL18 (=0.001).
The addition of CHX did not negatively influence the SBST. Meron-CHX-10% was the most biocompatible, and Riva-CHX-18% had more influence on the inflammatory process and presented slower tissue repair. Glass ionomer, chlorhexidine, biocompatibility, antimicrobial properties, microscope.
本研究的重点是评估经洗必泰(CHX)改性的玻璃离子水门汀(GICs)的抗菌性能、机械性能和生物相容性。
为评估生物相容性,使用了105只雄性Wistar大鼠,分为7组(n = 15):C组(对照组,聚乙烯),M组、M10组、M18组,以及RL组、RL10组、RL18组(M - 美龙和RL - 丽娃粘结剂:传统型,分别用10%和18%的CHX改性)。在光学显微镜下分析不同细胞事件和时间间隔的组织情况。还分析了抗菌效果和剪切粘结强度测试(SBST)。生物相容性通过Kruskal - Wallis和Dunn检验进行分析;SBST采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验(<0.05)。对于抗菌效果,使用Kruskal - Wallis和Friedman检验,随后进行Dunn检验(<0.05)。
组织形态学研究显示,在7天(= 0.013)和15天(= 0.032)的时间间隔内,C组和RL18组之间存在明显的炎症浸润差异。水泥的抗菌效果显示出与CHX浓度相关(= 0.001)。SBST显示美龙水泥组之间无显著差异(P = 0.385),然而,RL组与RL10组和RL18组之间存在差异(= 0.001)。
添加CHX对SBST没有负面影响。10% CHX改性的美龙粘结剂生物相容性最佳,18% CHX改性的丽娃粘结剂对炎症过程影响更大,组织修复较慢。玻璃离子水门汀、洗必泰、生物相容性、抗菌性能、显微镜。