Suppr超能文献

一种评估患者种植体间尺寸的新型三维方法——一项初步研究。

A new 3D-method to assess the inter implant dimensions in patients - A pilot study.

作者信息

Schmidt Alexander, Billig Jan-Wilhelm, Schlenz Maximiliane A, Wöstmann Bernd

机构信息

Dr Med Dent. Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Clinic, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

Dr Med Dent. Assistant Researcher, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Clinic, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Feb 1;12(2):e187-e192. doi: 10.4317/jced.56557. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex implant treatments have steadily increased within implant prosthodontics. Based on the lower implant mobility, implant impressions need high accuracy in the model transfer to receive a high passive fit within the final prosthodontic restoration. To analyze the accurate 3-dimensional (3D) inter-implant-positions, a reference point is indispensable. However, there is no reference in the patients mouth, so the aim of the present study was to develop a new method based on a custom-made-measuring-aid (CMA) to assess the inter implant dimensions (InID) in patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Initially an implant master model (IMM/patient equivalent) was digitized by computed tomography. A CMA was fixed on the impression posts and the inter implant dimensions (InID) were recorded with a coordinate measurement machine (CMM). For comparison to conventional and digital impression techniques, 10 impressions per technique were taken. InIDs for the IMM, the CMA and the two impression techniques were compared. To give a proof of principle, the new 3D-method was applied to three patients as pilot cases. Results for trueness and precision were analyzed by pairwise comparisons (< .05). All data were subjected to univariate ANOVA.

RESULTS

Mean deviation for InID ranged from 10.3±18μm(CMA) to 41.7±36μm(conventional). There were partially significant differences for InID between the CMA and the different impression techniques. There were no significant differences for InID within the CMA. The InID in the evaluation ranged from 42.3μm to 376.7μm(digital) and from 58.3μm to 274.0μm(conventional). There were partially significant differences between the techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of this study, with the developed method using a CMA it is possible to assess the true 3D-InID with a decisive higher accuracy than possible with a conventional or digital implant impression. Overall, the CMA in this study generated results that were deemed clinically useful for the investigated inter implant positions. Dental Implants, Dimensional Measurement Accuracy, Dental Impression Technique, Intraoral Scanner.

摘要

背景

在种植修复学中,复杂的种植治疗稳步增加。基于较低的种植体移动性,种植体印模在模型转移中需要高精度,以便在最终的修复体中实现高度的被动适合性。为了分析种植体间准确的三维(3D)位置,一个参考点是必不可少的。然而,患者口腔内没有参考点,因此本研究的目的是开发一种基于定制测量辅助工具(CMA)的新方法,以评估患者种植体间尺寸(InID)。

材料与方法

首先,通过计算机断层扫描对种植体主模型(IMM/患者等效模型)进行数字化处理。将一个CMA固定在印模桩上,并用坐标测量机(CMM)记录种植体间尺寸(InID)。为了与传统和数字印模技术进行比较,每种技术取10个印模。比较了IMM、CMA和两种印模技术的InID。为了验证原理,将新的3D方法应用于3例患者作为试点病例。通过成对比较(<.05)分析准确性和精密度结果。所有数据均进行单因素方差分析。

结果

InID的平均偏差范围为10.3±18μm(CMA)至41.7±36μm(传统方法)。CMA与不同印模技术之间的InID存在部分显著差异。CMA内的InID无显著差异。评估中的InID范围为42.3μm至376.7μm(数字方法)和58.3μm至274.0μm(传统方法)。不同技术之间存在部分显著差异。

结论

在本研究的范围内,使用CMA的开发方法能够以比传统或数字种植体印模更高的决定性精度评估真实的3D-InID。总体而言,本研究中的CMA产生的结果被认为对所研究的种植体间位置具有临床实用性。牙种植体、尺寸测量精度、牙印模技术、口腔内扫描仪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c1f/7018487/a1b9cc1f3a7d/jced-12-e187-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验