• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创腰椎减压和棘突间装置治疗症状性腰椎管狭窄症:文献综述。

Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Interspinous Process Device for the Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Literature Review.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Feb 18;24(4):13. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-0845-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11916-020-0845-2
PMID:32072362
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a condition affecting a growing number of individuals resulting in significant disability and pain. Traditionally, treatment options have consisted of conservative measures such as physical therapy, medication management, epidural injections and percutaneous adhesiolysis, or surgery. There exists a treatment gap for patients failing conservative measures who are not candidates for surgery. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD®) and interspinous process device (IPD) with Superion® represent minimally invasive novel treatment options that may help fill this gap in management. We performed a literature review to separately evaluate these procedures and assess the effectiveness and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

The available evidence for MILD and Superion has been continuously debated. Overall, it is considered that while the procedures are safe, there is only modest evidence for effectiveness. For both procedures, we have reviewed 13 studies. Based on the available evidence, MILD and Superion are safe and modestly effective minimally invasive procedures for patients with symptomatic LSS. It is our recommendation that these procedures may be incorporated as part of the continuum of treatment options for patients meeting clinical criteria.

摘要

目的综述

有症状的腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是一种影响越来越多的个体的疾病,导致严重的残疾和疼痛。传统上,治疗方案包括保守治疗,如物理治疗、药物管理、硬膜外注射和经皮粘连松解术,或手术。对于那些不能手术的保守治疗失败的患者,存在治疗空白。微创腰椎减压术(MILD®)和 Superion®棘突间装置是微创的新治疗选择,可能有助于填补这一管理空白。我们进行了文献回顾,分别评估这些程序并评估其有效性和安全性。

最新发现

MILD 和 Superion 的现有证据一直存在争议。总的来说,虽然这些程序是安全的,但有效性的证据只有适度。对于这两种程序,我们都审查了 13 项研究。根据现有证据,MILD 和 Superion 是安全的,对于有症状的 LSS 患者来说是一种适度有效的微创程序。我们建议将这些程序纳入符合临床标准的患者治疗方案的连续体中。

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Interspinous Process Device for the Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Literature Review.微创腰椎减压和棘突间装置治疗症状性腰椎管狭窄症:文献综述。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Feb 18;24(4):13. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-0845-2.
2
Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion).棘突间减压术(Superion)的成本效益和安全性
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(Suppl 2):S2-S8. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz245.
3
Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.微创腰椎减压术:一种治疗腰椎管狭窄症的方法。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Oct;26(5):573-9. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000432520.24210.54.
4
The incidence of lumbar spine surgery following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Superion Indirect Decompression System for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective review.微创腰椎减压和 Superior Indirect Decompression System 治疗腰椎管狭窄症后腰椎手术的发生率:回顾性研究。
Pain Pract. 2022 Jun;22(5):516-521. doi: 10.1111/papr.13111. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
A Comprehensive Review of Novel Interventional Techniques for Chronic Pain: Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Disc Disease-MILD Percutaneous Image Guided Lumbar Decompression, Vertiflex Interspinous Spacer, MinuteMan G3 Interspinous-Interlaminar Fusion.慢性疼痛新型介入技术的全面综述:腰椎狭窄症和退行性椎间盘疾病——微创经皮影像引导腰椎减压术、Vertiflex 棘突间撑开器、MinuteMan G3 棘突间-椎板间融合术。
Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4628-4645. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01875-8. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
The MIST Guidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for Minimally Invasive Spine Treatment.《MIST指南:腰椎管狭窄症微创脊柱治疗共识组指南》
Pain Pract. 2019 Mar;19(3):250-274. doi: 10.1111/papr.12744. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
7
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE.微创腰椎减压术治疗伴有神经源性跛行的腰椎狭窄症的长期安全性和疗效:MiDAS ENCORE 的 2 年结果。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):789-794. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000868.
8
Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.用于中度腰椎管狭窄继发间歇性神经源性跛行的Superion棘突间撑开器:一项FDA-IDE随机对照关键试验的两年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Mar 1;40(5):275-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000735.
9
Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.APERIUS(®)微创棘突间装置治疗伴有症状性神经源性间歇性跛行的退变性腰椎管狭窄症的初步安全性和有效性的临床评估。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2330-z. Epub 2012 May 8.
10
MiDAS I (mild Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): a preliminary report of a prospective, multi-center clinical study.MiDAS I(轻度减压替代开放性手术):一项前瞻性、多中心临床研究的初步报告。
Pain Physician. 2010 Jul-Aug;13(4):369-78.

引用本文的文献

1
A Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Interspinous Process Device: In Vitro Flexibility Assessment and Finite Element Analysis.一种新型棘突间装置的生物力学评估:体外灵活性评估与有限元分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;12(4):384. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12040384.
2
Efficacy and safety of interspinous process device compared with alone decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较棘突间装置与单纯减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38370. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038370.
3
A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Analysis of Findings of Systematic Reviews.经皮粘连松解术治疗腰椎术后综合征的疗效:系统评价结果的系统分析。
Pain Physician. 2019 Jul;22(4):307-322.
2
Evidence vs Consensus in Clinical Practice Guidelines.临床实践指南中的证据与共识
JAMA. 2019 Aug 27;322(8):725-726. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9751.
3
Identifying dominant inpatient trends leveraging electronic physician orders:The Medical Gopher 1993-2016.利用电子医生医嘱识别住院患者的主要趋势:1993 - 2016年的医疗地鼠系统
全腰椎内镜与棘突间撑开器治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效差异比较:临床结局的效应量Meta分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):102-123. doi: 10.14444/8200. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.腰椎管狭窄症最有效的治疗方法是什么:减压、融合还是棘突间装置?一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Sep 26;26:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.07.003. eCollection 2021 Jan.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:377-384. eCollection 2018.
4
Interspinous process decompression is associated with a reduction in opioid analgesia in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.棘突间减压术与腰椎管狭窄症患者阿片类镇痛药物使用量减少有关。
J Pain Res. 2018 Nov 20;11:2943-2948. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S182322. eCollection 2018.
5
Exploring the Role of Chronic Pain Clinics: Potential for Opioid Reduction.探讨慢性疼痛诊所的作用:减少阿片类药物的潜力。
Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):E603-E610.
6
Percutaneous Epidural Adhesiolysis Using Inflatable Balloon Catheter and Balloon-less Catheter in Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: A Randomized Controlled Trial.经皮充气球囊导管与非充气球囊导管在伴有神经源性跛行的中央型腰椎管狭窄症中的经皮硬膜外粘连松解术:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):593-606.
7
Are Pain Beliefs, Cognitions, and Behaviors Influenced by Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的疼痛信念、认知和行为是否受种族、民族和文化影响:系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):541-558.
8
Do Regenerative Medicine Therapies Provide Long-Term Relief in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.再生医学疗法能否为慢性下腰痛提供长期缓解:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):515-540.
9
Reframing the Role of Neuromodulation Therapy in the Chronic Pain Treatment Paradigm.重新审视神经调节疗法在慢性疼痛治疗模式中的作用。
Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):507-513.
10
The MIST Guidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for Minimally Invasive Spine Treatment.《MIST指南:腰椎管狭窄症微创脊柱治疗共识组指南》
Pain Pract. 2019 Mar;19(3):250-274. doi: 10.1111/papr.12744. Epub 2018 Dec 2.