• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助微创经胸食管切除术(Ivor Lewis):100 例连续患者的良好结果(欧洲经验)。

Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, D-55131, Mainz, Germany.

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jan;25(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04510-8. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-019-04510-8
PMID:32072382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7850999/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with intrathoracic anastomosis is gaining popularity as a treatment for esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to describe postoperative complications and short-term oncologic outcomes for RAMIE procedures using the da Vinci Xi robotic system 4-arm technique.

METHODS

Data of 100 consecutive patients with esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma undergoing modified Ivor Lewis esophagectomy were prospectively collected. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using an identical intrathoracic anastomotic reconstruction technique with the same perioperative management. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were graded according to Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) definitions.

RESULTS

Mean duration was 416 min (±80); 70% of patients had an uncomplicated postoperative recovery. Pulmonary complications were observed in 17% of patients. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 8% of patients. Median ICU stay was 1 day and median overall postoperative hospital stay was 11 days. The 30-day mortality was 1%; 90-day mortality was 3%. A R0 resection was reached in 92% of patients with a median number of 29 dissected lymph nodes. All patients had at least 7 months of follow-up with a median follow-up of 17 months. Median overall survival was not reached yet.

CONCLUSION

RAMIE with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis) for esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction cancer was technically feasible and safe. Postoperative complications and short-term oncologic results were comparable to the highest international standards nowadays.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)联合胸内吻合术作为食管癌的治疗方法越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在描述使用达芬奇 Xi 机器人系统 4 臂技术进行 RAMIE 手术后的术后并发症和短期肿瘤学结果。

方法

前瞻性收集了 100 例连续接受改良 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的食管或胃食管交界处癌患者的数据。所有手术均由同一位外科医生使用相同的胸腔内吻合重建技术和相同的围手术期管理进行。根据食管切除术并发症共识小组(ECCG)的定义对术中及术后并发症进行分级。

结果

平均手术时间为 416 分钟(±80);70%的患者术后恢复顺利。17%的患者发生肺部并发症。8%的患者发生吻合口漏。中位 ICU 住院时间为 1 天,中位总术后住院时间为 11 天。30 天死亡率为 1%;90 天死亡率为 3%。92%的患者达到 R0 切除,中位清扫淋巴结数为 29 个。所有患者的随访时间至少为 7 个月,中位随访时间为 17 个月。中位总生存期尚未达到。

结论

对于食管或胃食管交界处癌,行 RAMIE 联合胸内吻合术(Ivor Lewis)是可行且安全的。术后并发症和短期肿瘤学结果与目前最高的国际标准相当。

相似文献

1
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).机器人辅助微创经胸食管切除术(Ivor Lewis):100 例连续患者的良好结果(欧洲经验)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jan;25(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04510-8. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.机器人辅助经胸食管切除术机器人吻合术(Ivor Lewis):手术技术和早期结果。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):941-952. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01439-7. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
4
End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).机器人辅助 Ivor Lewis 微创食管切除术(RAMIE)中末端到侧的圆形吻合术。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Aug 13;35(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doab088.
5
Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.远端食管癌和胃食管交界癌全微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术的技术及短期疗效:来自六个欧洲中心的汇总数据
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):119-126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4938-2. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
6
Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术:机器人辅助与腹腔镜-胸腔镜技术。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1692-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
[Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].[微创食管癌切除术中Ivor-Lewis术式与McKeown术式的短期疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):888-91.
8
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与杂交微创食管切除术:来自欧洲大容量中心的倾向评分匹配短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7747-7755. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09254-2. Epub 2022 May 3.
9
Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.微创与开放经胸腹部食管切除术治疗食管癌(MIVATE) - 一项随机对照临床试验的研究方案 DRKS00016773。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04966-z.
10
Multicenter Experience in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy - a Comparison of Hybrid and Totally Robot-Assisted Techniques.机器人辅助微创食管切除术的多中心经验 - 杂交技术与全机器人辅助技术的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Oct;25(10):2463-2469. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05044-8. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-assisted functional minimally invasive radical resection of esophageal cancer.机器人辅助功能性微创食管癌根治术
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 May 11;23(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03830-1.
2
Enhanced short-term outcomes after full robotic-assisted minimally invasive Ivor Lewis procedure compared to the hybrid approach.与杂交手术相比,全机器人辅助微创Ivor Lewis手术的短期疗效更佳。
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 5;19(1):198. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02345-x.
3
Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Modern Approaches to Prevention and Diagnosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
2
Comparative Perioperative Outcomes by Esophagectomy Surgical Technique.比较不同食管切除术手术技术的围手术期结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jun;24(6):1261-1268. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04269-y. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.
食管癌切除术后吻合口漏:预防与诊断的现代方法
Cureus. 2025 Mar 5;17(3):e80091. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80091. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Robotic- assisted minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis handsewn anastomosis technique and outcomes from a large-volume European centre.机器人辅助微创Ivor-Lewis手工缝合吻合术技术及来自一家大型欧洲中心的结果
Dis Esophagus. 2025 Mar 3;38(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaf019.
5
A comparative assessment of ACS NSQIP-predicted and actual surgical risk outcomes of robotic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma resection at a high volume institution.高容量机构行机器人经胸食管切除术治疗食管腺癌的 ACS NSQIP 预测与实际手术风险结果的比较评估。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 5;18(1):280. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02034-1.
6
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.机器人辅助与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较:18187 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 16;18(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01880-3.
7
Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与微创食管切除术的比较
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 15;13:1293645. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1293645. eCollection 2023.
8
A narrative review of anastomotic leak in the Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: expected, accepted, but preventable.关于艾弗·刘易斯食管切除术吻合口漏的叙述性综述:可预期、可接受,但可预防。
Transl Cancer Res. 2023 Sep 30;12(9):2405-2419. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-515. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
9
Intraoperative minimally invasive left bronchial reconstruction using a pericardial flap during robot-assisted esophagectomy.机器人辅助食管癌切除术中使用心包瓣进行术中微创左支气管重建。
JTCVS Tech. 2023 Jun 20;21:221-223. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.06.005. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient: a multicenter retrospective matched-cohort study.老年患者的微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术:一项多中心回顾性配对队列研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 May 12;13:1104109. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1104109. eCollection 2023.
机器人辅助微创与开放食管切除术的早期生活质量结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep;108(3):920-928. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.075. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Innovative fully robotic 4-arm Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (RAMIE4).创新型全机器人 4 臂 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术(RAMIE4)。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Mar 16;33(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz015.
5
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与传统微创食管切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Jun;15(3):e1988. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1988. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
Preoperative endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation decreases the rate of delayed gastric emptying after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.术前内镜下幽门球囊扩张可降低经左胸入路食管胃切除术(Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy)后胃排空延迟的发生率。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jun 1;32(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy097.
7
Clinical implication of the innovations of the 8 edition of the TNM classification for esophageal and esophago-gastric cancer.第8版食管癌和食管胃癌TNM分类创新的临床意义
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug;10(Suppl 22):S2671-S2681. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.182.
8
Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸经胸食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-630. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031.
9
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.倾向性评分匹配分析比较微创 Ivor Lewis 与微创 McKeown 食管切除术。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):128-133. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002982.
10
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术的短期疗效:倾向评分匹配分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 23;13(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0727-4.