Suppr超能文献

住院病房护理工作的缺失。

Omission of nursing care in hospitalization units.

作者信息

Lima Juliana Carvalho de, Silva Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo, Caliri Maria Helena Larcher

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020 Feb 14;28:e3233. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3138.3233. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to describe the prevalence and reasons for omission of nursing care, according to the perception of nursing professionals working in a teaching hospital.

METHOD

a cross-sectional study was carried out with 267 professionals from ten hospitalization units. Data were collected by the MISSCARE-Brasil instrument. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare differences in the prevalence of omission among professional categories.

RESULTS

among the elements of nursing care, the highest prevalence of omission consisted in: to sit up the patient out of bed (70.3%), ambulation three times a day (69.1%), and participation in the discussion of the interdisciplinary team on patient's health care (67.2%). The most frequent reasons were: inadequate number of staff (85.4%), inadequate number of staff for providing care or in administrative tasks (81.6%), and unexpected increase in the number and/or greater severity of patients (79.8%). Nurses reported major omission than nursing technicians/auxiliaries in four elements of care (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

according to our study, there is high prevalence of omission of nursing care elements from the professionals' perspective. Factors related to human and material resources were more reported as causes for such omission.

摘要

目的

根据教学医院护理专业人员的认知,描述护理缺失的发生率及原因。

方法

对来自十个住院科室的267名专业人员进行了横断面研究。数据通过巴西版MISSCARE工具收集。采用描述性统计以及Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验来比较不同专业类别中护理缺失发生率的差异。

结果

在护理要素中,护理缺失发生率最高的项目包括:协助患者坐起(70.3%)、每日三次步行锻炼(69.1%)以及参与跨学科团队关于患者医疗护理的讨论(67.2%)。最常见的原因是:工作人员数量不足(85.4%)、提供护理或行政工作的人员数量不足(81.6%)以及患者数量意外增加和/或病情更严重(79.8%)。在四项护理要素中,护士报告的护理缺失情况比护理技术员/辅助人员更多(p<0.05)。

结论

根据我们的研究,从专业人员的角度来看,护理要素缺失的发生率很高。与人力和物力资源相关的因素被更多地报告为导致此类缺失的原因。

相似文献

1
Omission of nursing care in hospitalization units.住院病房护理工作的缺失。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020 Feb 14;28:e3233. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3138.3233. eCollection 2020.
5
Factors associated with care omission and patient safety climate.与护理疏忽和患者安全氛围相关的因素。
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2024 Apr 22;45:e20230059. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230059.en. eCollection 2024.
7
Reasons correlated with omission of nursing care.与遗漏护理相关的原因。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Nov 28;56:e20220171. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0171en. eCollection 2022.
8
Patient safety culture, missed Nursing care and its reasons in Obstetrics.患者安全文化、产科护理缺失及其原因。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jun 28;29:e3461. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.4855.3461. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

4
Reasons correlated with omission of nursing care.与遗漏护理相关的原因。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Nov 28;56:e20220171. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0171en. eCollection 2022.
8
Patient safety culture, missed Nursing care and its reasons in Obstetrics.患者安全文化、产科护理缺失及其原因。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jun 28;29:e3461. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.4855.3461. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验