Department of Radiology, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Cancer Med. 2020 Apr;9(8):2653-2659. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2877. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
China has an increasing burden of breast cancer. However, with a large population of dense breast patients, the diagnostic efficiency of conventional digital mammography is attenuated.
From July 2017 to October 2018, we retrospectively reviewed 397 dense breast patients who underwent contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in West China Hospital. Among them, 53 patients who had both CESM and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) results and 114 patients who had pathological diagnoses were finally enrolled. All images were reviewed by two independent radiologists according to the 2013 Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) with all disagreements handed to an associate professor for final decisions. Correlation analyses between CESM and DCE-MRI were conducted. The diagnostic performance of CESM were investigated.
The kappa value of the BI-RADS scores between CESM and DCE-MRI was 0.607 (P < .001), indicating high correspondence between CESM and DCE-MRI. As for lesion size measurement, moderate correlation (Kendall's tau coefficient: 0.556, P < .001) was detected between CESM and DCE-MRI. Using pathological diagnoses as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of CESM were 82.4%, 96.4%, and 0.894, respectively.
CESM demonstrated excellent overall diagnostic accuracy and a moderate correlation in lesion size estimation against DCE-MRI in dense breast patients, supporting it to be an alternative to DCE-MRI in breast cancer detection and diagnosis, especially for exclusion diagnosis.
中国乳腺癌负担日益加重。然而,由于大量致密型乳腺患者的存在,常规数字乳腺摄影的诊断效率受到影响。
我们回顾性分析了 2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 10 月在华西医院行对比增强能谱乳腺摄影(CESM)的 397 例致密型乳腺患者的资料。其中,53 例患者同时具有 CESM 和动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)结果,114 例患者具有病理诊断,最终纳入研究。所有图像均由两位独立的放射科医生根据 2013 年乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)进行评估,所有意见不一致的病例由一位副教授进行最终裁决。对 CESM 和 DCE-MRI 进行相关性分析。研究了 CESM 的诊断性能。
CESM 和 DCE-MRI 的 BI-RADS 评分之间的 Kappa 值为 0.607(P<.001),表明 CESM 和 DCE-MRI 之间具有高度一致性。在病灶大小测量方面,CESM 和 DCE-MRI 之间存在中度相关性(Kendall's tau 系数:0.556,P<.001)。以病理诊断为参考标准,CESM 的灵敏度、特异度和曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 82.4%、96.4%和 0.894。
在致密型乳腺患者中,CESM 与 DCE-MRI 相比,具有出色的整体诊断准确性和病灶大小估计的中度相关性,支持其作为乳腺癌检测和诊断的替代方法,特别是在排除诊断方面。