• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习临床试验可以像玩游戏一样简单吗?对“学校教育提高对随机试验的认识”(START)计划的定性探索。

Can learning about trials be child's play? A qualitative exploration of the 'Schools Teaching Awareness of Randomised Trials' (START) initiative.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Health Research Board - Trials Methodology Research Network, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Feb 19;21(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4130-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-4130-9
PMID:32075675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7031984/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network (HRB-TMRN) celebrates International Clinical Trials Day with the help of the younger members of our community through the Network's 'Schools Teaching Awareness of Randomised Trials (START)' initiative. START seeks to increase public awareness of randomised trials in Ireland. Launched in 2016, it asks children (8-12 years old) to conduct and report their very own fun randomised trial. The study reported in this paper sought to explore children and teachers perceptions and experiences of the START initiative.

METHODS

We conducted eight, one-to one interviews with teachers and eight focus groups with 61 children who took part in the 2018 START initiative. Interviews and focus groups were recorded and transcribed and the data analysed using template analysis.

RESULTS

The findings of this study highlight the benefits of participating in START and the areas of the initiative that required further attention. Teachers and children recalled the benefits of experiential learning associated with START and learning by doing encouraged a fun way of engaging with trial processes. By recalling all aspects of planning, conducting and reporting their trial, the children in this study demonstrated their awareness of the trial processes. The teachers suggested that START provides a valuable framework to contribute to key aspects of the primary school curriculum in Ireland. The experiences of these participants also provided recommendation for improving the programme for future START participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing public awareness and understanding of randomised trials can help increase public engagement in trials. By educating children about the importance of trials and supporting them to 'learn by doing' by carrying out their own trial, the START initiative can contribute substantially to children's awareness and understanding of trial processes. Given that children are the public, the patients and the researchers of the future, initiatives such as START deserve attention.

摘要

背景

健康研究委员会-试验方法学研究网络(HRB-TMRN)在社区年轻成员的帮助下庆祝国际临床试验日,通过网络的“学校教育随机试验意识(START)”计划。START 旨在提高爱尔兰公众对随机试验的认识。该计划于 2016 年启动,要求儿童(8-12 岁)进行并报告他们自己的有趣的随机试验。本文报道的研究旨在探讨儿童和教师对 START 计划的看法和经验。

方法

我们对 8 名教师和 8 组 61 名参加 2018 年 START 计划的儿童进行了一对一访谈和焦点小组讨论。对访谈和焦点小组进行了录音和转录,并使用模板分析对数据进行了分析。

结果

这项研究的结果强调了参与 START 的好处,以及该计划需要进一步关注的领域。教师和儿童回忆起与 START 相关的体验式学习和边做边学的好处,这鼓励了一种有趣的方式参与试验过程。通过回忆他们计划、进行和报告试验的所有方面,本研究中的儿童展示了他们对试验过程的认识。教师们认为 START 为爱尔兰小学课程的关键方面提供了一个有价值的框架。这些参与者的经验还为改进未来 START 参与者的项目提供了建议。

结论

提高公众对随机试验的认识和理解有助于增加公众对试验的参与。通过教育儿童试验的重要性,并支持他们通过自己的试验“边做边学”,START 计划可以大大提高儿童对试验过程的认识和理解。鉴于儿童是未来的公众、患者和研究人员,像 START 这样的计划值得关注。

相似文献

1
Can learning about trials be child's play? A qualitative exploration of the 'Schools Teaching Awareness of Randomised Trials' (START) initiative.学习临床试验可以像玩游戏一样简单吗?对“学校教育提高对随机试验的认识”(START)计划的定性探索。
Trials. 2020 Feb 19;21(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4130-9.
2
Understanding influences on teachers' uptake and use of behaviour management strategies within the STARS trial: process evaluation protocol for a randomised controlled trial.了解在STARS试验中影响教师采用和使用行为管理策略的因素:一项随机对照试验的过程评估方案
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 10;15:119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1486-y.
3
Teachers' perceptions about children's movement and learning in early childhood education programmes.教师对幼儿教育项目中儿童运动与学习的看法。
Child Care Health Dev. 2015 Jan;41(1):122-31. doi: 10.1111/cch.12136. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
4
'Posture for Learning': meeting the postural care needs of children with physical disabilities in mainstream primary schools in England--a research into practice exploratory study.“学习姿势”:满足英格兰主流小学中身体残疾儿童的姿势护理需求——一项实践探索性研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(19-20):1912-24. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.544837. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
5
Effect of a Trauma-Awareness Course on Teachers' Perceptions of Conflict With Preschool-Aged Children From Low-Income Urban Households: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.创伤意识课程对教师感知与来自低收入城市家庭的学龄前儿童冲突的影响:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e193193. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3193.
6
Voiding school as a treatment of daytime incontinence or enuresis: Children's experiences of the intervention.排尿训练学校作为日间尿失禁或遗尿症的一种治疗方法:儿童对该干预措施的体验。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Feb;14(1):56.e1-56.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
7
Evaluating the community education programme of an insecticide-treated bed net trial on the Kenyan coast.评估肯尼亚海岸经杀虫剂处理蚊帐试验的社区教育项目。
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Sep;11(3):280-91. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.3.280.
8
A quasi-experimental cross-disciplinary evaluation of the impacts of education outside the classroom on pupils' physical activity, well-being and learning: the TEACHOUT study protocol.一项关于课外教育对学生身体活动、幸福感和学习影响的准实验性跨学科评估:TEACHOUT研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 24;16(1):1117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3780-8.
9
An exploration of factors that influence the regular consumption of water by Irish primary school children.对影响爱尔兰小学生定期饮水的因素的探索。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2008 Oct;21(5):512-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2008.00880.x.
10
Engaging adolescents in tuberculosis and clinical trial research through drama.通过戏剧让青少年参与结核病及临床试验研究。
Trials. 2016 Apr 6;17:177. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1291-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Informed health choices intervention to teach primary school children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: process evaluation.知情健康选择干预措施,以教导低收入国家的小学生评估有关治疗效果的主张:过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e030787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030787.
2
Factors affecting patient participation in clinical trials in Ireland: A narrative review.影响爱尔兰患者参与临床试验的因素:一项叙述性综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Mar 2;3:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.01.002. eCollection 2016 Aug 15.
3
Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?试验构建指南1:试验中的研究(SWAT)是什么?
Trials. 2018 Feb 23;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2535-5.
4
Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research.在医疗保健研究中采用定性描述方法。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017 Nov 24;4:2333393617742282. doi: 10.1177/2333393617742282. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
5
Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme.随机对照试验中参与者的招募与保留:对由英国卫生技术评估计划资助并发表的试验的综述
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e015276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276.
6
Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review.定性描述性研究的特征:一项系统评价
Res Nurs Health. 2017 Feb;40(1):23-42. doi: 10.1002/nur.21768. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
7
The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research.模板分析在定性心理学研究中的效用
Qual Res Psychol. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2014.955224. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
8
Examining Barriers and Practices to Recruitment and Retention in Stroke Clinical Trials.探讨卒中临床试验中招募和留住参与者的障碍及做法。
Stroke. 2015 Aug;46(8):2232-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008564. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
9
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
10
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set.如何在设定研究重点时增加价值和减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. Epub 2014 Jan 8.