• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕妇妊娠糖尿病体验的系统评价:定性证据方案。

Experiences of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.

机构信息

School of Health and Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

School of Health and Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e034126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034126.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034126
PMID:32075837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7044968/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing and an issue of global concern. GDM can cause severe adverse effects for pregnant women and their fetuses. This systematic review is proposed to explore women's experiences during the pregnancy with GDM. This review will provide insights into the physical, psychological and social adaptation experiences of women with GDM that can help to identify challenges of glycaemic control and provide targeted care and interventions to improve maternal and child health.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The databases we will search include English databases (ie, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, OpenGrey and Deep Blue) and Chinese databases (ie, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals). Published qualitative evidence of life changes or experiences of the women with GDM will be searched. There will be no limits on publication year. Two reviewers will independently use the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research for methodological validity prior to inclusion in this review. Any disagreements regarding article evaluation will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using the standardised data extraction tool from JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Synthesis will include in-depth reading of the original text and the discovery of the results, and then summarising similar categories for more advanced synthesised findings. The final synthesised findings will be graded according to the ConQual approach for establishing confidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study does not require ethical approval as primary data will not be collected. Results of this systematic review will be submitted to peer-reviewed international journals for publication and be presented in relevant international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019132065.

摘要

简介

妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的发病率不断上升,是一个全球性关注的问题。GDM 会给孕妇及其胎儿带来严重的不良影响。本系统评价旨在探讨患有 GDM 的孕妇在怀孕期间的体验。这一综述将深入了解 GDM 女性在身体、心理和社会适应方面的体验,有助于识别血糖控制的挑战,并提供有针对性的护理和干预措施,以改善母婴健康。

方法和分析

我们将检索的数据库包括英文数据库(即 PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、JBI 系统评价数据库、PsycINFO、OpenGrey 和 Deep Blue)和中文数据库(即中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网和维普数据库)。将搜索发表的关于 GDM 女性生活变化或体验的定性证据。对发表年份不设限制。在纳入本综述之前,两位评审员将使用 JBI 定性研究批判性评价清单对方法学的有效性进行独立评估。对于文章评估的任何分歧,将通过讨论或由第三位评审员解决。使用 JBI 系统统一管理、评估和信息审查的标准化数据提取工具提取数据。综合分析将包括深入阅读原文和发现结果,然后对相似类别进行总结,以得出更高级别的综合发现。最终的综合发现将根据 ConQual 方法进行分级,以确定信心水平。

伦理和传播

本研究不需要伦理批准,因为不会收集原始数据。系统评价的结果将提交给同行评议的国际期刊发表,并在相关国际会议上展示。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019132065。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/052a/7044968/ce6fa2416dd4/bmjopen-2019-034126f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/052a/7044968/46c28c2b2a82/bmjopen-2019-034126f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/052a/7044968/d85a9b75cc44/bmjopen-2019-034126f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/052a/7044968/3971584b7537/bmjopen-2019-034126f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/052a/7044968/ce6fa2416dd4/bmjopen-2019-034126f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/052a/7044968/46c28c2b2a82/bmjopen-2019-034126f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/052a/7044968/d85a9b75cc44/bmjopen-2019-034126f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/052a/7044968/3971584b7537/bmjopen-2019-034126f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/052a/7044968/ce6fa2416dd4/bmjopen-2019-034126f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Experiences of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.孕妇妊娠糖尿病体验的系统评价:定性证据方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e034126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034126.
2
Healthcare provider's experiences of supporting breastfeeding: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence.卫生保健提供者支持母乳喂养的体验:系统评价定性证据的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e056001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056001.
3
Living experiences of patients with advanced cancer with low socioeconomic status: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence.低社会经济地位的晚期癌症患者的生活体验:系统评价定性证据的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e054606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054606.
4
The experiences of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的体验:定性证据的系统评价。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021 Dec;22(4):777-787. doi: 10.1007/s11154-020-09610-4. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
5
Baccalaureate nursing students' experiences with high-fidelity simulation: protocol for a qualitative systematic review.护理学士学生在高保真模拟中的体验:一项定性系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 8;10(12):e040171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040171.
6
Positive experiences of family caregivers of patients with chronic heart failure: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.慢性心力衰竭患者的家庭照顾者积极体验的定性系统评价和元分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 8;12(12):e063880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063880.
7
Barriers and facilitators to dementia care in long-term care facilities: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.长期护理机构中痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价和荟萃综合的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 1;13(11):e076058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076058.
8
Experiences and management needs of endocrine therapy-related symptoms in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis protocol.乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗相关症状的体验和管理需求:系统评价和定性证据综合方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 7;13(12):e073915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073915.
9
Web-based interventions for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.基于网络的干预措施在妊娠糖尿病孕妇中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 29;12(6):e061151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061151.
10
Disclosure of medical errors to patients by medical professionals: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review.医学专业人员向患者披露医疗差错:一项定性系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 11;14(10):e085795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085795.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of fine particulate matter exposure on gestational diabetes mellitus risk: a retrospective cohort study.暴露于细颗粒物对妊娠期糖尿病风险的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):787-793. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae094.
2
Diabetes Research Matters: A Three-Round Priority-Setting Survey Consultation with Adults Living with Diabetes and Family Members in Australia.糖尿病研究至关重要:在澳大利亚与成年糖尿病患者及其家属进行的三轮优先事项设定调查咨询。
Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):441-455. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00688-5. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
3
Development and psychometric evaluation of the High-Risk Pregnancy Well-Being Index in Mashhad: a methodological study.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of dietary inorganic nitrate for lowering blood pressure in hypertensive adults: a systematic review.膳食无机硝酸盐对高血压成年人降压效果的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Mar;17(3):365-389. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003842.
2
Women's views on lifestyle changes to reduce the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: a systematic review, qualitative synthesis and recommendations for practice.女性对生活方式改变以降低妊娠期糖尿病后发展为 2 型糖尿病风险的看法:系统评价、定性综合和实践建议。
Diabet Med. 2019 Jun;36(6):702-717. doi: 10.1111/dme.13926. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
3
马什哈德高危妊娠幸福感指数的制定及其心理计量学评估:一种方法学研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01529-0.
4
Healthcare provider's experiences of supporting breastfeeding: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence.卫生保健提供者支持母乳喂养的体验:系统评价定性证据的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e056001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056001.
5
Baccalaureate nursing students' experiences with high-fidelity simulation: protocol for a qualitative systematic review.护理学士学生在高保真模拟中的体验:一项定性系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 8;10(12):e040171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040171.
A qualitative study about the experiences of ethnic minority pregnant women with gestational diabetes.
一项关于少数民族妊娠期糖尿病孕妇经历的定性研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Sep;33(3):621-631. doi: 10.1111/scs.12655. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
4
Effect of exercise modality on markers of insulin sensitivity and blood glucose control in pregnancies complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.运动方式对妊娠合并妊娠期糖尿病患者胰岛素敏感性标志物及血糖控制的影响:一项系统评价
Obes Sci Pract. 2018 Sep 4;4(5):455-467. doi: 10.1002/osp4.283. eCollection 2018 Oct.
5
In utero exposure to gestational diabetes mellitus and long term endocrine morbidity of the offspring.宫内暴露于妊娠期糖尿病与子代长期内分泌疾病风险。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Oct;144:231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
6
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Gestational Diabetes Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline.营养与饮食学会妊娠期糖尿病循证营养实践指南
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1719-1742. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in mainland China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中国大陆妊娠期糖尿病患病率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Jan;10(1):154-162. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12854. Epub 2018 May 27.
8
Gestational diabetes from A to Z.妊娠期糖尿病全解。
World J Diabetes. 2017 Dec 15;8(12):489-511. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i12.489.
9
Healthcare interventions for the prevention and control of gestational diabetes mellitus in China: a scoping review.中国预防和控制妊娠期糖尿病的医疗保健干预措施:一项范围综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1353-1.
10
Gestational Diabetes Testing, Narrative, and Medical Distrust.妊娠期糖尿病检测、叙述与医疗不信任。
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):53-63. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9762-9. Epub 2016 Dec 22.