School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 8;10(12):e040171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040171.
High-fidelity simulation (HFS) can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and nursing practice and improve safety and quality of patient care in baccalaureate nursing education. Although inconsistent assessment instruments or lack of high-quality research designs affect the strength of the evidence and limit the generalisability of the results, quantitative studies generally demonstrate the effectiveness of HFS in baccalaureate nursing education. Synthesis of the existing evidence of baccalaureate nursing students' experiences with HFS is crucial for the improvement and revision of simulation design and teaching.
A comprehensive search for qualitative studies on baccalaureate nursing students' experiences with HFS will be conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, ProQuest, Web of Science, PsycINFO, the Cochrane library, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals. This review considered studies reported in English or Chinese, and studies that were conducted between January 2000 and December 2019 in view of the launch of International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. The literature search will be conducted by two independent reviewers, and any disagreement will be adjudicated by discussion or with a third reviewer. The two independent reviewers will use the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research to assess the methodological validity, following which the JBI standardised data extraction tools will be used to extract relevant data. The JBI meta-aggregation method will be subsequently used to synthesise the data, eventually forming themes, categories and synthesised findings. The final synthesised findings will establish confidence levels based on the JBI ConQual approach.
This review does not require formal ethical review since it is based on available published literature. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and, if possible, presented in scientific conferences.
高保真模拟(HFS)可以弥合理论知识与护理实践之间的差距,提高本科护理教育中患者护理的安全性和质量。尽管不一致的评估工具或缺乏高质量的研究设计影响了证据的强度,并限制了结果的普遍性,但定量研究普遍证明了 HFS 在本科护理教育中的有效性。综合现有的本科护理学生在 HFS 中的体验证据对于改进和修订模拟设计和教学至关重要。
将在以下数据库中全面搜索关于本科护理学生在 HFS 中的体验的定性研究:PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、ProQuest、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Cochrane 图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国国家知识基础设施和中文科技期刊数据库 VIP 数据库。本综述考虑了以英语或中文报告的研究,并考虑到国际护理协会临床模拟与学习的启动,在 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间进行了研究。文献检索将由两名独立审查员进行,如果出现分歧,将通过讨论或第三名审查员进行裁决。两名独立的审查员将使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)的定性研究批判性评估清单来评估方法学的有效性,之后将使用 JBI 标准化的数据提取工具来提取相关数据。随后,JBI 元聚合方法将用于综合数据,最终形成主题、类别和综合发现。最终的综合发现将根据 JBI ConQual 方法建立置信水平。
本综述不需要正式的伦理审查,因为它基于现有的已发表文献。研究结果将通过在同行评议的期刊上发表和(如果可能)在科学会议上展示来传播。