毛细血管再充盈时间状态可在符合脓毒症-3标准的感染性休克患者中识别出不同的临床表型：ANDROMEDA-SHOCK试验的事后分析 - Suppr

Capillary refill time status could identify different clinical phenotypes among septic shock patients fulfilling Sepsis-3 criteria: a post hoc analysis of ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial.

作者信息

Hernández Glenn, Kattan Eduardo, Ospina-Tascón Gustavo, Bakker Jan, Castro Ricardo

机构信息

Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Santiago, Chile.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Fundación Valle del Lili, Universidad ICESI, Carrera 98 # 18-49, Cali, Colombia.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):816-818. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05960-4. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-020-05960-4

PMID:32076766

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Capillary refill time status could identify different clinical phenotypes among septic shock patients fulfilling Sepsis-3 criteria: a post hoc analysis of ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial.毛细血管再充盈时间状态可在符合脓毒症-3标准的感染性休克患者中识别出不同的临床表型：ANDROMEDA-SHOCK试验的事后分析

Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):816-818. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05960-4. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

Hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial study protocol.基于血流动力学表型、以毛细血管再充盈时间为目标的早期脓毒性休克复苏：ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 随机临床试验研究方案。

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Jan-Mar;34(1):96-106. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220004-pt.

[Capillary refill time as a guide to initial resuscitation in sepsis. About the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial].[毛细血管再充盈时间作为脓毒症初始复苏的指导。关于ANDROMEDA-SHOCK试验]

Rev Med Chil. 2020 Nov;148(11):1701-1703. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872020001101701.

A lactate-targeted resuscitation strategy may be associated with higher mortality in patients with septic shock and normal capillary refill time: a post hoc analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK study.对于脓毒性休克且毛细血管再充盈时间正常的患者，乳酸靶向复苏策略可能与更高的死亡率相关：ANDROMEDA-SHOCK研究的事后分析

Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Aug 26;10(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00732-1.

Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial.以外周灌注状态为目标的复苏策略与血清乳酸水平对感染性休克患者 28 天死亡率的影响：ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 随机临床试验。

JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):654-664. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0071.

Hydrocortisone Compared with Placebo in Patients with Septic Shock Satisfying the Sepsis-3 Diagnostic Criteria and APROCCHSS Study Inclusion Criteria: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ADRENAL Trial.氢化可的松与安慰剂在符合 Sepsis-3 诊断标准和 APROCCHSS 研究纳入标准的脓毒性休克患者中的比较：ADRENAL 试验的事后分析。

Anesthesiology. 2019 Dec;131(6):1292-1300. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002955.

Effects of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status versus Serum Lactate Levels among Patients with Septic Shock. A Bayesian Reanalysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Trial.以外周灌注状态为目标的复苏策略与脓毒性休克患者血清乳酸水平的影响。ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 试验的贝叶斯再分析。

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb 15;201(4):423-429. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0968OC.

Perspectives on peripheral perfusion assessment.外周灌注评估的观点。

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Jun 1;29(3):208-214. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001038. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

Comparison of International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference Versus Sepsis-3 Definitions for Children Presenting With Septic Shock to a Tertiary Care Center in India: A Retrospective Study.国际儿科脓毒症共识会议与脓毒症-3 定义在印度一家三级护理中心用于诊断感染性休克患儿的比较：一项回顾性研究。

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):e122-e129. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001864.

Timing of Renal Support and Outcome of Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Post Hoc Analysis of the AKIKI Randomized Clinical Trial.肾脏支持时机与感染性休克和急性呼吸窘迫综合征结局的关系。AKIKI 随机临床试验的事后分析。

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul 1;198(1):58-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1255OC.

引用本文的文献

Capillary refill time: testing microcirculatory responses to maintain blood flow.毛细血管再充盈时间：测试微循环对维持血流的反应。

Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Jul 31;13(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00749-5.

Cardiac arrest and microcirculatory dysfunction: a narrative review.心脏骤停与微循环功能障碍：一篇叙述性综述。

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024 Dec 1;30(6):611-617. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001219. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

Capillary refill time response to a fluid challenge or a vasopressor test: an observational, proof-of-concept study.毛细血管再充盈时间对液体冲击或血管加压药试验的反应：一项观察性概念验证研究。

Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Apr 1;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01275-5.

Consistency of data reporting in fluid responsiveness studies in the critically ill setting: the CODEFIRE consensus from the Cardiovascular Dynamic section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.危重症患者液体反应性研究中数据报告的一致性：来自欧洲重症监护医学学会心血管动力学分会的CODEFIRE共识

Intensive Care Med. 2024 Apr;50(4):548-560. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07344-4. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet?脓毒性休克治疗中的液体与早期血管加压药：我们找到正确答案了吗？

J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2023 Jul 31;9(3):138-147. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2023-0022. eCollection 2023 Jul.

The role of peripheral perfusion markers and lactate in septic shock resuscitation.外周灌注标志物和乳酸在感染性休克复苏中的作用。

J Intensive Med. 2021 Dec 21;2(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2021.11.002. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Jan-Mar;34(1):96-106. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220004-pt.

Cutting-Edge Technology for Rapid Bedside Assessment of Capillary Refill Time for Early Diagnosis and Resuscitation of Sepsis.用于脓毒症早期诊断和复苏的床边快速评估毛细血管再充盈时间的前沿技术。

Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Dec 21;7:612303. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.612303. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb 15;201(4):423-429. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0968OC.

Derivation, Validation, and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Sepsis.新型败血症临床表型的推导、验证及潜在治疗意义。

JAMA. 2019 May 28;321(20):2003-2017. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5791.

JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):654-664. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0071.

A hypoperfusion context may aid to interpret hyperlactatemia in sepsis-3 septic shock patients: a proof-of-concept study.低灌注背景可能有助于解释脓毒症3.0脓毒性休克患者的高乳酸血症：一项概念验证研究。

Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0253-x. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》

JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Capillary refill time status could identify different clinical phenotypes among septic shock patients fulfilling Sepsis-3 criteria: a post hoc analysis of ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

文件翻译

深度研究

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献