• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DRCR 视网膜网络初始观察方法治疗中心性糖尿病黄斑水肿和良好视力眼的评估:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。

Assessment of the DRCR Retina Network Approach to Management With Initial Observation for Eyes With Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Visual Acuity: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.

Paducah Retinal Center, Paducah, Kentucky.

出版信息

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 1;138(4):341-349. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.6035.

DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.6035
PMID:32077907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7042938/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Among eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and good visual acuity (VA), randomized clinical trial results showed no difference in VA loss between initial observation plus aflibercept only if VA decreased, initial focal/grid laser plus aflibercept only if VA decreased, or prompt aflibercept. Understanding the initial observation approach is relevant to patient management.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the DRCR Retina Network protocol-defined approach and outcomes of initial observation with aflibercept only if VA worsened.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a post hoc secondary analyses of a randomized clinical trial of the DRCR Retina Network Protocol V that included 91 US and Canadian sites from November 2013 to September 2018. Participants were adults (n = 236) with type 1 or 2 diabetes, 1 study eye with CI-DME, and VA letter score at least 79 (Snellen equivalent, 20/25 or better) assigned to initial observation. Data were analyzed from March 2019 to November 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Initial observation and follow-up with aflibercept only for VA loss of at least 10 letters from baseline at 1 visit or 5 to 9 letters at 2 consecutive visits. Follow-up occurred at 8 weeks and then every 16 weeks unless VA or optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness worsened.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Whether individuals received aflibercept.

RESULTS

Among 236 eyes in 236 individuals (149 [63%] male; median age, 60 years [interquartile range, 53-67 years]) randomly assigned to initial observation, 80 (34%) were treated with aflibercept during 2 years of follow-up. At 2 years, the median VA letter score was 86.0 (interquartile range, 89.0-81.0; median Snellen equivalent, 20/20 [20/16-20/25]). Receipt of aflibercept was more likely in eyes with baseline central subfield thickness at least 300 μm (Zeiss-Stratus equivalent) vs less than 300 μm (45% vs 26%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.98 [95% CI, 1.26-3.13], continuous P = .005), moderately severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study retinopathy severity level 47) and above vs moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (retinopathy severity level 43) and below (51% vs 27%; HR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.42-3.47], ordinal P < .001), and among participants whose nonstudy eye received DME treatment within 4 months of randomization vs not (52% vs 25%; HR, 2.55 [95% CI, 1.64-3.99], P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Most eyes managed with initial observation plus aflibercept only if VA worsened maintained good vision at 2 years and did not require aflibercept for VA loss. However, the eyes in the trial were approximately twice as likely to receive aflibercept for VA loss if they had greater baseline central subfield thickness, worse diabetic retinopathy severity level, or a nonstudy eye receiving treatment for DME.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01909791.

摘要

重要性

在中心累及糖尿病性黄斑水肿(CI-DME)且视力良好的眼(VA)中,随机临床试验结果表明,在 VA 下降时,与仅初始观察加阿柏西普相比,初始局部/网格激光加阿柏西普或立即阿柏西普治疗在 VA 丧失方面无差异。了解初始观察方法与患者管理相关。

目的

评估 DRCR 视网膜网络协议规定的方法和仅在 VA 恶化时使用阿柏西普的初始观察结果。

设计、地点和参与者:这是对 2013 年 11 月至 2018 年 9 月进行的 DRCR 视网膜网络协议 V 的随机临床试验的二次事后分析,包括来自 91 个美国和加拿大地点的 236 名参与者。参与者为患有 1 型或 2 型糖尿病、1 只研究眼伴有 CI-DME 和 VA 字母评分至少为 79(Snellen 等价物,20/25 或更好)的成年人,随机分配至初始观察。数据于 2019 年 3 月至 2019 年 11 月进行分析。

干预措施

初始观察和后续治疗仅用于 VA 在一次就诊时至少下降 10 个字母或连续两次就诊时下降 5 到 9 个字母的阿柏西普。每隔 8 周进行一次随访,然后每 16 周进行一次随访,除非 VA 或光学相干断层扫描中央视网膜厚度恶化。

主要结局和测量指标

是否接受阿柏西普治疗。

结果

在 236 名参与者的 236 只眼中(149[63%]为男性;中位年龄 60 岁[四分位距,53-67 岁])随机分配至初始观察,80 只眼(34%)在 2 年随访期间接受了阿柏西普治疗。在 2 年时,VA 字母评分中位数为 86.0(四分位距,89.0-81.0;中位数 Snellen 等价物,20/20[20/16-20/25])。与基线中央视网膜厚度至少为 300μm(蔡司-斯图尔特等效)的眼相比,基线中央视网膜厚度小于 300μm(45%比 26%;危险比[HR],1.98[95%CI,1.26-3.13])、中度严重非增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变(早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究严重程度 47)及以上与中度非增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变(严重程度 43)及以下(51%比 27%;HR,2.22[95%CI,1.42-3.47]),以及在非研究眼在随机分组后 4 个月内接受 DME 治疗的参与者中,接受阿柏西普治疗的可能性更高(52%比 25%;HR,2.55[95%CI,1.64-3.99],P<.001)。

结论和相关性

大多数接受初始观察加阿柏西普治疗的眼在 2 年内保持良好的视力,且不需要因 VA 丧失而使用阿柏西普治疗。然而,在试验中,如果基线中央视网膜厚度更大、糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度更高或非研究眼接受 DME 治疗,则接受阿柏西普治疗的可能性是前者的大约两倍。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01909791。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the DRCR Retina Network Approach to Management With Initial Observation for Eyes With Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Visual Acuity: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.DRCR 视网膜网络初始观察方法治疗中心性糖尿病黄斑水肿和良好视力眼的评估:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 1;138(4):341-349. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.6035.
2
Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Vision Loss Among Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Involving the Center of the Macula and Good Visual Acuity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.阿柏西普与激光光凝及观察治疗对中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变黄斑区累及及良好视力患者视力丧失影响的随机临床试验
JAMA. 2019 May 21;321(19):1880-1894. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5790.
3
Five-Year Outcomes after Initial Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema (Protocol T Extension Study).初始阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的 5 年结果(协议 T 扩展研究)。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Sep;127(9):1201-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
4
Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗伴有视力损害的累及中心的糖尿病性黄斑水肿后持续性黄斑增厚:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):257-269. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565.
5
Association of Baseline Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness With 1-Year Efficacy of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema.基线视力和视网膜厚度与阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿1年疗效的相关性
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;134(2):127-34. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4599.
6
Risk Factors for Meeting Criteria for Switching from Bevacizumab to Aflibercept When Treating Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Visual Acuity of < 20/40.患有糖尿病性黄斑水肿且视力<20/40 的眼睛转为使用阿柏西普时符合转换标准的风险因素。
Ophthalmology. 2024 Aug;131(8):967-974. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.01.037. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
7
Ranibizumab or Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.雷珠单抗或阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:抗视网膜病变!注册研究的 1 年结局比较。
Ophthalmology. 2020 May;127(5):608-615. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
8
Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Comparative Effectiveness Trial for Diabetic Macular Edema: Additional Efficacy Post Hoc Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial.糖尿病性黄斑水肿抗血管内皮生长因子比较有效性试验:一项随机临床试验的额外疗效事后分析
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12). doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3698.
9
Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项比较疗效随机临床试验的两年结果。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
10
Factors Associated With Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness Changes When Treating Diabetic Macular Edema With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: An Exploratory Analysis of the Protocol T Randomized Clinical Trial.抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿时与视力和中央视网膜神经纤维层厚度变化相关的因素:Protocol T 随机临床试验的探索性分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 1;137(4):382-389. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.6786.

引用本文的文献

1
Modulation of Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Retinopathy: Therapeutic Role of Natural Polyphenols.糖尿病视网膜病变中氧化应激的调节:天然多酚的治疗作用
Antioxidants (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;14(7):875. doi: 10.3390/antiox14070875.
2
Real-world outcomes of early and deferred anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular oedema in patients with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病患者糖尿病性黄斑水肿早期和延迟抗VEGF治疗的真实世界结局
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2530218. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2530218. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
3
Intravitreal therapy for the management of diabetic retinopathy: A concise review.玻璃体内注射疗法治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变:简要综述
World J Exp Med. 2024 Dec 20;14(4):99235. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i4.99235.
4
Subfoveal neurosensory detachment flattening and observe (SNF-Ob) approach for the management of Ci-DMO - a multicentric study.脉络膜新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性经脉络膜上腔神经感觉层脱离复位和观察(SNF-Ob)治疗的多中心研究。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Dec;38(17):3272-3278. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03275-y. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
5
Intensive Glycemic Management Is Associated With Reduced Retinal Structure Abnormalities on Ocular Coherence Tomography in the DCCT/EDIC Study.强化血糖管理与 DCCT/EDIC 研究中眼部相干断层扫描的视网膜结构异常减少有关。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Sep 1;47(9):1522-1529. doi: 10.2337/dc23-2408.
6
Diabetic Disease of the Eye in Canada: Consensus Statements from a Retina Specialist Working Group.加拿大糖尿病眼病:视网膜专科医生工作组的共识声明
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 May;13(5):1071-1102. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00923-0. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
Clinically significant macular edema in an underserved population: Association with demographic factors and hemoglobin A1c.服务不足人群中的临床显著黄斑水肿:与人口统计学因素和血红蛋白 A1c 的关联。
Optom Vis Sci. 2024 Jan 1;101(1):25-36. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002096. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
8
Natural course of non-center-involving diabetic macular edema progression in patients under initial observation.初次观察的非中心累及性糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的自然病程
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 1;72(2):236-239. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2182_22. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
9
Intravitreal DEX Implant for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review of National Consensus.玻璃体内地塞米松植入物治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项全国性共识综述
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Oct 13;15(10):2461. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15102461.
10
Effect of Adjunctive Intravitreal Conbercept Injection at the End of 25G Vitrectomy on Severe Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: 6-Month Outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial.25G玻璃体切割术结束时玻璃体腔内注射康柏西普辅助治疗重度增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的效果:一项随机对照试验的6个月结果
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):1173-1180. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00664-6. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Vision Loss Among Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Involving the Center of the Macula and Good Visual Acuity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.阿柏西普与激光光凝及观察治疗对中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变黄斑区累及及良好视力患者视力丧失影响的随机临床试验
JAMA. 2019 May 21;321(19):1880-1894. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5790.
2
Elimination of Topical Antibiotics for Intravitreous Injections and the Importance of Using Povidone-Iodine: Update From the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络关于玻璃体内注射局部用抗生素的停用及使用聚维酮碘的重要性:最新进展
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 1;134(10):1181-1183. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2741.
3
Panretinal Photocoagulation vs Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.全视网膜光凝与玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2137-2146. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15217.
4
Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
5
Reproducibility of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography retinal thickness measurements and conversion to equivalent time-domain metrics in diabetic macular edema.糖尿病性黄斑水肿中光谱域光学相干断层扫描视网膜厚度测量的可重复性及向等效时域指标的转换
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;132(9):1113-22. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1698.
6
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
7
Retinal thickness in people with diabetes and minimal or no diabetic retinopathy: Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography.糖尿病患者的视网膜厚度:海德堡光谱 OCT 研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Dec 13;53(13):8154-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10290.
8
Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis).视力评估的前瞻性研究:临床实践中Snellen视力表与ETDRS视力表的比较(一篇美国眼科学会论文)
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2009 Dec;107:311-24.
9
Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.用于风险或患病率比值及差异的简易SAS计算。
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Aug 1;162(3):199-200. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi188. Epub 2005 Jun 29.
10
A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.一种视力测试的计算机化方法:糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究测试方案的改编
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;135(2):194-205. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01825-1.