School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
St James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Feb 20;15(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-0687-x.
Management of hospitalised osteoporotic vertebral fracture patients was explored across all major trauma orthopaedic hospitals in Ireland. Findings, based on a survey of orthopaedic doctors and physiotherapists, indicate a lack of standardised clinical care pathways. This study will inform development of clinical audit mechanisms and health service development for this large and growing fracture population in both Ireland and internationally.
To explore the management of hospitalised vertebral fragility fracture (VFF) patients in Ireland.
A cross-sectional survey of orthopaedic doctors (specialist registrar level) and physiotherapists was conducted across all hospitals with major orthopaedic trauma units in Ireland. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics in SPSS (V24).
Responses were achieved from 100% (n = 16) of the hospitals (42 individual physiotherapists and 47 orthopaedic doctors). Conservative management was usual with both orthopaedic doctors (n = 37, 79%) and physiotherapists (n = 40, 96%) reporting prescription of bracing as common practice despite a lack of underpinning evidence. A majority (87%) of the doctors believed osteoporosis medications should commence prior to discharge from the acute setting, but 68% did not agree that responsibility for coordination and delivery of bone health assessment and fracture risk management rested with them. A majority (72%) of physiotherapists reported an absence or were unsure regarding existence of fracture liaison services. 73% of physiotherapists reported prescribing an inpatient or home (78%) exercise programme, including mobility, strength and balance exercise though detail on dose and adherence remain unknown. Wide variance in referral patterns to multi-disciplinary team (MDT) members existed although 79% of orthopaedic doctors supported an MDT approach.
Clinical care pathways for the hospitalised VFF population lack standardisation in Ireland. Key challenges reported by orthopaedic doctors and physiotherapists relate to pain management, osteoporosis medication prescription, clarity on indications for bracing and a lack of fracture liaison services. Clinical guidelines, defined clinical care pathways and high-quality clinical research trials are required for VFF management.
对爱尔兰所有主要创伤骨科医院的住院骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的管理进行了探讨。基于对骨科医生和物理治疗师的调查结果表明,缺乏标准化的临床护理路径。本研究将为爱尔兰和国际上这一庞大且不断增长的骨折人群提供临床审核机制和卫生服务发展的信息。
探讨爱尔兰住院椎体脆性骨折(VFF)患者的管理情况。
对爱尔兰所有拥有主要创伤骨科单位的医院的骨科医生(专科住院医师水平)和物理治疗师进行了横断面调查。使用 SPSS(V24)中的描述性统计数据对数据进行分析。
从 100%(n=16)的医院(42 名物理治疗师和 47 名骨科医生)获得了回应。保守治疗是常规治疗,骨科医生(n=37,79%)和物理治疗师(n=40,96%)都报告说,尽管缺乏基础证据,但普遍开具支具处方。大多数医生(87%)认为,骨质疏松症药物应在从急性环境出院前开始服用,但 68%的医生不同意协调和提供骨健康评估和骨折风险管理的责任在于他们。大多数物理治疗师(72%)报告说缺乏或不确定是否存在骨折联络服务。73%的物理治疗师报告开了住院或家庭(78%)运动方案,包括移动、力量和平衡运动,尽管剂量和依从性的详细信息仍不清楚。多学科团队(MDT)成员的转诊模式存在很大差异,尽管 79%的骨科医生支持 MDT 方法。
爱尔兰住院 VFF 人群的临床护理路径缺乏标准化。骨科医生和物理治疗师报告的主要挑战与疼痛管理、骨质疏松症药物处方、支具适应症的明确性以及缺乏骨折联络服务有关。需要为 VFF 管理制定临床指南、明确的临床护理路径和高质量的临床研究试验。