From the Ottawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, (V.Y., D.D.), University of Ottawa, Canada.
Ottawa Methods Center (T.R., D.A.F.), University of Ottawa, Canada.
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1120-1127. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027451. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
Background and Purpose- Definitions of significant hematoma expansion traditionally focus on changes in intraparenchymal volume. The presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a predictor of poor outcome, but current definitions of hematoma expansion do not include IVH expansion. We evaluated whether including IVH expansion to current definitions of hematoma expansion improves the ability to predict 90-day outcome. Methods- Using data from the PREDICT-ICH study (Predicting Hematoma Growth and Outcome in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Contrast Bolus CT), we compared a standard definition of hematoma expansion (≥6 mL or ≥33%) to revised definitions that includes new IVH development or expansion (≥6 mL or ≥33% or any IVH; ≥6 mL or ≥33% or IVH expansion ≥1 mL). The primary outcome was poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 4-6) at 90 days. Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated for each definition, and C statistics for each definition were compared using nonparametric methods. Results- Of the 256 patients eligible for primary analysis, 127 (49.6%) had a modified Rankin Scale score of 4 to 6. Sensitivity and specificity for the standard definition (n=80) were 45.7% (95% CI, 36.8-54.7) and 82.9% (95% CI, 75.3-88.9), respectively. The revised definition, ≥6 mL or ≥33% or any IVH (n=113), possessed a sensitivity of 63.8% (95% CI, 54.8-72.1) and specificity of 75.2% (95% CI, 66.8-82.4). Overall accuracy was significantly improved with the revised definition (=0.013) and after adjusting for relevant covariates, was associated with a 2.55-fold increased odds (95% CI, 1.31-4.94) of poor outcome at 90 days. A second revised definition, ≥6 mL or ≥33% or IVH expansion ≥1 mL, performed similarly (sensitivity, 56.7% [95% CI, 47.6-65.5]; specificity, 78.3% [95% CI, 40.2-85.1]; aOR, 2.40 [95% CI, 1.23-4.69]). Conclusions- In patients with mild-to-moderate ICH, including IVH expansion to the definition of hematoma expansion improves sensitivity with only minimal decreases to specificity and improves overall prediction of 90-day outcome.
背景与目的-传统上,血肿扩大的定义侧重于脑实质内体积的变化。脑室出血(IVH)的存在是预后不良的预测因素,但目前的血肿扩大定义不包括 IVH 扩大。我们评估了将 IVH 扩大纳入当前血肿扩大定义是否能提高预测 90 天结局的能力。
方法-利用 PREDICT-ICH 研究(使用对比剂团注 CT 预测颅内出血血肿扩大和结局)的数据,我们比较了标准的血肿扩大定义(≥6ml 或≥33%)和修订的定义,修订的定义包括新的 IVH 发展或扩大(≥6ml 或≥33%或任何 IVH;≥6ml 或≥33%或 IVH 扩大≥1ml)。主要结局为 90 天时不良临床结局(改良 Rankin 量表评分 4-6)。为每个定义计算了诊断准确性指标,并使用非参数方法比较了每个定义的 C 统计量。
结果-在 256 名符合主要分析条件的患者中,127 名(49.6%)改良 Rankin 量表评分为 4-6。标准定义(n=80)的敏感性和特异性分别为 45.7%(95%CI,36.8-54.7)和 82.9%(95%CI,75.3-88.9)。修订定义,≥6ml 或≥33%或任何 IVH(n=113)的敏感性为 63.8%(95%CI,54.8-72.1),特异性为 75.2%(95%CI,66.8-82.4)。修订定义的整体准确性显著提高(=0.013),且在调整相关协变量后,与 90 天时不良结局的 odds 比增加 2.55 倍(95%CI,1.31-4.94)相关。第二个修订定义,≥6ml 或≥33%或 IVH 扩大≥1ml,表现类似(敏感性,56.7%[95%CI,47.6-65.5];特异性,78.3%[95%CI,40.2-85.1];aOR,2.40[95%CI,1.23-4.69])。
结论-在轻中度 ICH 患者中,将 IVH 扩大纳入血肿扩大定义可提高敏感性,而特异性仅有微小下降,从而提高 90 天结局的整体预测能力。