• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对患者做出共情回应:一个旨在减少肺癌污名化的沟通技巧培训模块。

Responding empathically to patients: a communication skills training module to reduce lung cancer stigma.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):613-618. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa011.

DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibaa011
PMID:32080736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7963287/
Abstract

Most lung cancer patients report perceiving stigma surrounding their diagnosis, and routine clinical interactions with their health care providers (HCPs) are reported as a common source. The adverse effects of lung cancer stigma are associated with several adverse psychosocial and behavioral outcomes. One potential clinician-level intervention target is empathic communication because of its association with higher rates of patients' satisfaction, treatment adherence, and lower levels of psychological distress. This study describes the conceptual model and evaluation of clinician-targeted empathic communication skills training to reduce lung cancer patients' experience of stigma. The goal of the training module is to enhance clinician recognition and responsiveness to lung cancer patients' empathic opportunities by communicating understanding, reducing stigma and distress, and providing support. Thirty multidisciplinary HCPs working in thoracic oncology, thoracic surgery, or pulmonary medicine participated in 2.25 hr of didactic and experiential training on responding empathically to patients with lung cancer. Overall, participants reported highly favorable evaluations of the training, with at least 90% of participants agreeing or strongly agreeing to 11 of the 12 items assessing clinical relevance, novelty, clarity, and facilitator effectiveness. Participants' self-efficacy to communicate empathically with lung cancer patients increased significantly from pretraining to posttraining, t(29) = -4.58, p < .001. The empathic communication skills training module was feasible and well received by thoracic and pulmonary medicine HCPs and demonstrated improvements in self-efficacy in empathic communication from pretraining to posttraining. The examination of patient outcomes is warranted.

摘要

大多数肺癌患者报告称,他们在诊断过程中感受到了耻辱感,而与医疗保健提供者(HCPs)的常规临床互动被认为是一个常见的来源。肺癌耻辱感的不良影响与一些不良的心理社会和行为结果有关。共情沟通是一个潜在的临床医生干预目标,因为它与患者满意度、治疗依从性的提高以及心理困扰程度的降低有关。本研究描述了针对临床医生的共情沟通技能培训的概念模型和评估,以减少肺癌患者的耻辱感体验。培训模块的目标是通过传达理解、减少耻辱感和痛苦以及提供支持,增强临床医生对肺癌患者共情机会的识别和反应能力。30 名从事胸肿瘤学、胸外科或肺病学的多学科 HCP 参加了 2.25 小时的关于对肺癌患者进行共情反应的理论和实践培训。总的来说,参与者对培训的评价非常高,至少有 90%的参与者对评估临床相关性、新颖性、清晰度和促进者有效性的 12 项中的 11 项表示同意或强烈同意。参与者与肺癌患者进行共情沟通的自我效能感在培训前后显著增加,t(29)=-4.58,p<0.001。共情沟通技能培训模块在胸科和肺病科 HCP 中是可行的,且受到了欢迎,并在培训前后自我效能感的共情沟通方面取得了显著提高。需要进一步研究患者的结果。

相似文献

1
Responding empathically to patients: a communication skills training module to reduce lung cancer stigma.对患者做出共情回应:一个旨在减少肺癌污名化的沟通技巧培训模块。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):613-618. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa011.
2
Feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of empathic communication skills training to reduce lung cancer stigma in Nigeria: a pilot study.在尼日利亚,共情沟通技能培训减少肺癌污名的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效:一项试点研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Jun 5;2024(63):30-37. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae006.
3
Oncology Care Provider Training in Empathic Communication Skills to Reduce Lung Cancer Stigma.肿瘤护理提供者同理心沟通技能培训以减少肺癌污名。
Chest. 2021 May;159(5):2040-2049. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.024. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
4
Empathic communication skills training to reduce lung cancer stigma: Study protocol of a cluster randomized control trial.共情沟通技巧培训以减少肺癌污名化:一项集群随机对照试验研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Oct;145:107669. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107669. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
5
Responding empathically to patients: Development, implementation, and evaluation of a communication skills training module for oncology nurses.对患者的共情回应:肿瘤护理人员沟通技能培训模块的开发、实施与评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Apr;99(4):610-616. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.021. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
6
Getting ready for prime time: Recommended adaptations of an Empathic Communication Skills training intervention to reduce lung cancer stigma for a national multi-center trial.准备好迎接黄金时段:推荐对共情沟通技巧培训干预进行适应性调整,以减少全国多中心试验中肺癌污名化。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Sep 28;13(10):804-808. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad048.
7
The implementation and evaluation of a communication skills training program for oncology nurses.一项针对肿瘤护理人员的沟通技巧培训项目的实施与评估
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):615-623. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0473-5.
8
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.针对与癌症患者打交道的医疗保健专业人员的沟通技能培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub4.
9
Evaluating relationships between lung cancer stigma, anxiety, and depressive symptoms and the absence of empathic opportunities presented during routine clinical consultations.评估肺癌污名、焦虑和抑郁症状之间的关系,以及常规临床会诊期间缺乏共情机会的情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):322-328. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
10
Missed opportunities for interval empathy in lung cancer communication.肺癌沟通中错失的共情时机。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1853-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.17.1853.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials and in clinical practice: report from the XXI national conference of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).临床试验和临床实践中的患者报告结局(PROs):来自意大利医学肿瘤学会(AIOM)第21届全国会议的报告
BMJ Oncol. 2025 Jun 17;4(1):e000783. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000783. eCollection 2025.
2
Australia's National Lung Cancer Screening Program-It's Time to Address the Stigma in the Room.澳大利亚国家肺癌筛查计划——是时候正视房间里的耻辱感了。
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Apr;36(2):e70011. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70011.
3
Interventions to Reduce Lung Cancer and COPD-Related Stigma: A Systematic Review.干预措施以减少肺癌和 COPD 相关污名:系统评价。
Ann Behav Med. 2024 Oct 18;58(11):729-740. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae048.
4
Empathic communication skills training to reduce lung cancer stigma: Study protocol of a cluster randomized control trial.共情沟通技巧培训以减少肺癌污名化:一项集群随机对照试验研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Oct;145:107669. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107669. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
5
Feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of empathic communication skills training to reduce lung cancer stigma in Nigeria: a pilot study.在尼日利亚,共情沟通技能培训减少肺癌污名的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效:一项试点研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Jun 5;2024(63):30-37. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae006.
6
Examining evidence of lung cancer stigma among health-care trainees.检查医疗培训生中肺癌污名的证据。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Jun 5;2024(63):20-29. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae010.
7
Cancer stigma: the need for policy and programmatic action.癌症污名:需要政策和计划行动。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Jun 5;2024(63):45-50. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae014.
8
Physicians' attention to patients' communication cues can improve patient satisfaction with care and perception of physicians' empathy.医生关注患者的沟通提示可以提高患者对护理的满意度和对医生同理心的感知。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 May 3;79:100377. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100377. eCollection 2024.
9
A systematic review on the qualitative experiences of people living with lung cancer in rural areas.农村地区肺癌患者生活体验的定性研究系统综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Feb 6;32(3):144. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08342-4.
10
Real-world analysis of the relationships between smoking, lung cancer stigma, and emotional functioning.真实世界中吸烟、肺癌污名与情绪功能的关系分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Feb;13(3):e6702. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6702. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing a Core Gap in Cancer Care - The NCI Moonshot Program to Help Oncology Patients Stop Smoking.填补癌症护理的核心空白——美国国立癌症研究所的“登月计划”助力肿瘤患者戒烟。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 7;380(6):512-515. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1813913. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
2
A rigorous evaluation of an institutionally-based communication skills program for post-graduate oncology trainees.对机构为研究生肿瘤学受训者设立的沟通技巧项目的严格评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Nov;101(11):1924-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
Multilevel Opportunities to Address Lung Cancer Stigma across the Cancer Control Continuum.多层面机会解决癌症控制连续体中的肺癌污名问题。
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Aug;13(8):1062-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Empathic Communication in Virtual Education for Nursing Students: I'm Sorry to Hear That.护理专业学生虚拟教育中的共情沟通:很遗憾听到这个消息。
Nurse Educ. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):18-22. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000308.
5
Responding empathically to patients: Development, implementation, and evaluation of a communication skills training module for oncology nurses.对患者的共情回应:肿瘤护理人员沟通技能培训模块的开发、实施与评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Apr;99(4):610-616. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.021. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
6
Association between patient-provider communication and lung cancer stigma.患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通与肺癌耻辱感之间的关联。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 May;24(5):2093-2099. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-3014-0. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
Clinical significance of smoking cessation in subjects with cancer: a 30-year review.癌症患者戒烟的临床意义:一项30年的综述。
Respir Care. 2014 Dec;59(12):1924-36. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02559. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
8
Stigma among patients with lung cancer: a patient-reported measurement model.肺癌患者的耻辱感:一种患者报告的测量模型。
Psychooncology. 2014 Jan;23(1):81-92. doi: 10.1002/pon.3371. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
9
A 30-year perspective on psychosocial issues in lung cancer: how lung cancer "Came out of the Closet".30 年来肺癌心理社会问题的研究进展:肺癌“走出了隐蔽角落”。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2012 Nov;22(4):449-56. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2012.07.008.
10
Toward a greater understanding of breast cancer patients' decisions to discuss cancer-related internet information with their doctors: an exploratory study.旨在更深入地了解乳腺癌患者是否愿意与医生讨论与癌症相关的互联网信息:一项探索性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 19.