Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Palliat Med. 2020 May;34(5):651-666. doi: 10.1177/0269216320902666. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
Increasing evidence shows that advance care planning is effective in improving outcomes. However, its applicability and acceptability outside Western cultures remain unknown. Examination of relevant cultural adaptations is required prior to wider adoption.
To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally adapted advance care planning intervention in a Taiwanese inpatient hospital for advanced cancer patients, family members and healthcare professionals.
A single-group, non-controlled, mixed methods feasibility study guided by a previously developed logic model. The culturally adapted advance care planning intervention represented a one-time intervention, comprising pre-advance care planning preparation and follow-up consultation. Qualitative interviews explored participants' view on their involvement in the study. Patients' medical records were examined to assess intervention fidelity. Findings from both data sets were integrated following analysis.
= 29 participants ( = 10 patients; = 10 family members and = 9 healthcare professionals) participated in the intervention, of who 28 completed follow-up interviews. Of the 10 advance care planning interventions delivered, most components ( = 10/13) were met. Key contextual moderators influencing the intervention feasibility included: (1) resource constraints resulting in increased workload; (2) care decisions informed by relatives' experiences of care; (3) the requirement for financial and policy support; and (4) a presumption for end-of-life care provision and surrogate decision-making. Six areas of intervention refinement were identified for future research.
Implementing a culturally adapted advance care planning intervention in an inpatient hospital setting in Taiwan is possible. The participants reported the intervention to be acceptable. However, careful attention to the conceptual underpinning using local primary data is imperative for its success.
越来越多的证据表明,预先护理计划在改善结果方面是有效的。然而,其在西方文化以外的适用性和可接受性尚不清楚。在更广泛采用之前,需要对相关的文化适应性进行检查。
在台湾一家晚期癌症住院患者、家属和医疗保健专业人员的医院中,检查经过文化适应性调整的预先护理计划干预措施的可行性和可接受性。
一项单组、非对照、混合方法可行性研究,以先前开发的逻辑模型为指导。经过文化适应性调整的预先护理计划干预措施代表了一次干预,包括预先护理计划准备和后续咨询。定性访谈探讨了参与者对参与研究的看法。检查患者的病历以评估干预的一致性。在分析后整合了来自两个数据集的结果。
29 名参与者(10 名患者;10 名家属和 9 名医疗保健专业人员)参加了干预,其中 28 名完成了随访访谈。在实施的 10 项预先护理计划干预中,大多数(10/13)都得到了满足。影响干预可行性的关键背景调节因素包括:(1)资源限制导致工作量增加;(2)护理决策受亲属护理经验的影响;(3)需要财务和政策支持;(4)对提供临终关怀和代理决策的假设。确定了未来研究中需要改进的六个干预领域。
在台湾的住院医院环境中实施经过文化适应性调整的预先护理计划干预是可行的。参与者报告该干预措施是可接受的。然而,为了确保其成功,必须使用当地的原始数据仔细关注其概念基础。