Worth Patrick J, Leal Julie, Ding Qian, Trickey Amber, Dua Monica M, Chatzizacharias Nikolaos, Soonawalla Zahir, Athanasopoulos Panagiotis, Toumpanakis Christos, Hansen Paul, Parks Rowan W, Connor Saxon, Parker Kate, Koea Jonathan, Srinavasa Sanket, Ielpo Benedetto, Vicente Lopez Emilio, Lawrence Benjamin, Visser Brendan C
Stanford University, United States.
University of Toronto, Canada.
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Sep;22(9):1359-1367. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
In 2017, the WHO updated their 2010 classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, introducing a well-differentiated, highly proliferative grade 3 tumor, distinct from neuroendocrine carcinomas. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of this update in a large cohort of resected tumors.
Using a multicenter, international dataset of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine lesions, patients were classified both according to the WHO 2010 and 2017 schema. Multivariable survival analyses were performed, and the models were evaluated for discrimination ability and goodness of fit.
Excluding patients with a known germline MEN1 mutation and incomplete data, 544 patients were analyzed. The performance of the WHO 2010 and 2017 models was similar, however surgically resected grade 3 tumors behaved very similarly to neuroendocrine carcinomas.
The addition of a grade 3 NET classification may be of limited utility in surgically resected patients, as these lesions have similar postoperative survival compared to carcinomas. While the addition may allow for a more granular evaluation of novel treatment strategies, surgical intervention for high grade tumors should be considered judiciously.
2017年,世界卫生组织(WHO)更新了其2010年胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的分类,引入了一种分化良好、增殖性高的3级肿瘤,与神经内分泌癌不同。本研究的目的是在一大群接受手术切除的肿瘤患者中调查这一更新的临床意义。
利用一个多中心、国际性的胰腺神经内分泌病变患者数据集,根据WHO 2010年和2017年的分类方案对患者进行分类。进行多变量生存分析,并对模型的区分能力和拟合优度进行评估。
排除已知胚系MEN1突变和数据不完整的患者后,共分析了544例患者。WHO 2010年和2017年模型的表现相似,然而手术切除的3级肿瘤的行为与神经内分泌癌非常相似。
对于接受手术切除的患者,增加3级神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)分类的作用可能有限,因为这些病变与癌相比术后生存率相似。虽然这一分类增加可能有助于对新治疗策略进行更细致的评估,但对于高级别肿瘤的手术干预应谨慎考虑。