• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在台湾,冠心病且基线 LDL-C 为 70-100mg/dL 的患者中,他汀类药物治疗二级预防的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for secondary prevention among patients with coronary artery disease and baseline LDL-C 70-100 mg/dL in Taiwan.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Division of Cardiology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 May;119(5):907-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2020.01.010
PMID:32081563
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recommended target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients has been lowered from 100 to 70 mg/dL in several clinical guidelines for secondary prevention. We aimed to assess whether initiating statin treatment in CAD patients with baseline LDL-C 70-100 mg/dL in Taiwan could be cost-effective.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to simulate a hypothetical cohort of CAD patients with a baseline LDL-C level of 90 mg/dL. The incidence and recurrence of MI and stroke related to specific LDL-C levels as well as the statin effect, mortality rate, and health state utilities were obtained from the literature. The direct medical costs and rate of fatal events were derived from the national claims database. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was calculated, and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Moderate-intensity statin use, a treatment regimen expected to achieve LDL <70 mg/dL in the base case, resulted in a net gain of 562 QALYs but with an additional expenditure of $11.4 million per 10,000 patients over ten years. The ICER was $20,288 per QALY gained. The probabilities of being cost-effective at willingness-to-pay thresholds of one and three gross domestic product per capita ($24,329 in 2017) per QALY were 51.1% and 94.2%, respectively. Annual drug cost was the most influential factor on the ICER.

CONCLUSION

Lowering the target LDL-C level from 100 to 70 mg/dL among treatment-naïve CAD patients could be cost-effective given the health benefits of preventing cardiovascular events and deaths.

摘要

背景

几项二级预防临床指南建议将冠心病(CAD)患者的目标低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平从 100 降至 70mg/dL。我们旨在评估在台湾基线 LDL-C 为 70-100mg/dL 的 CAD 患者中开始他汀类药物治疗是否具有成本效益。

方法

开发了一个马尔可夫模型来模拟基线 LDL-C 水平为 90mg/dL 的 CAD 患者的假设队列。MI 和与特定 LDL-C 水平相关的中风的发生率和复发率以及他汀类药物的作用、死亡率和健康状态效用均来自文献。直接医疗成本和致命事件的发生率来自国家索赔数据库。计算了每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER),并进行了敏感性分析。

结果

中等强度他汀类药物的使用,一种预计在基线时 LDL <70mg/dL 的治疗方案,导致净增益 562QALYs,但在十年内每 10,000 名患者额外支出 1140 万美元。ICER 为每获得一个 QALY 增加 20,288 美元。在愿意支付的阈值为一个和三个人均国内生产总值(2017 年为 24,329 美元)的情况下,具有成本效益的概率分别为 51.1%和 94.2%。每年的药物成本是对 ICER 影响最大的因素。

结论

对于未接受治疗的 CAD 患者,将目标 LDL-C 水平从 100 降至 70mg/dL,考虑到预防心血管事件和死亡的健康获益,可能具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for secondary prevention among patients with coronary artery disease and baseline LDL-C 70-100 mg/dL in Taiwan.在台湾,冠心病且基线 LDL-C 为 70-100mg/dL 的患者中,他汀类药物治疗二级预防的成本效益。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 May;119(5):907-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
Economic evaluation of ezetimibe treatment in combination with statin therapy in the United States.美国依折麦布与他汀类药物联合治疗的经济学评估。
J Med Econ. 2017 Jul;20(7):723-731. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1320559. Epub 2017 May 15.
3
Cost-effectiveness of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level-Guided Statin Treatment in Patients With Borderline Cardiovascular Risk.基于 LDL-C 水平的他汀类药物治疗边缘心血管风险患者的成本效果分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;4(10):969-977. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2851.
4
Potential cost-effectiveness of C-reactive protein screening followed by targeted statin therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among patients without overt hyperlipidemia.对于无明显高脂血症的患者,采用C反应蛋白筛查并随后进行针对性他汀类药物治疗以预防心血管疾病的潜在成本效益。
Am J Med. 2003 Apr 15;114(6):485-94. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00074-3.
5
Comparing impact and cost-effectiveness of primary prevention strategies for lipid-lowering.比较降脂一级预防策略的影响和成本效益。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 17;150(4):243-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-4-200902170-00005.
6
Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics.根据选定的患者特征评估降胆固醇治疗的成本效益。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 16;132(10):769-79. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00002.
7
2017 Taiwan lipid guidelines for high risk patients.2017年台湾高危患者血脂指南。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2017 Apr;116(4):217-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.11.013. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
Cost effectiveness of statin therapy for the primary prevention of major coronary events in individuals with type 2 diabetes.他汀类药物治疗对2型糖尿病患者主要冠状动脉事件一级预防的成本效益
Diabetes Care. 2003 Jun;26(6):1796-801. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1796.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Evolocumab in Adult Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease from Chinese Healthcare Perspective.从中国医疗保健角度看依洛尤单抗在成年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者中的成本效益
Adv Ther. 2023 Feb;40(2):489-503. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02372-2. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl, Evolocumab, Alirocumab, Ezetimibe, or Fenofibrate in Combination with Statins Compared to Statin Monotherapy.依泽替米贝、依洛尤单抗、阿利西尤单抗、二十碳五烯酸乙酯或非诺贝特联合他汀类药物与他汀类药物单药治疗相比的成本效益。
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Aug;42(8):643-656. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01173-3. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and associated factors of non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medication: a nationwide cross sectional survey in Pakistan.抗高血脂药物治疗不依从的流行情况及其相关因素:巴基斯坦全国性横断面调查。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71120-z.
2
Cost-utility analysis of using high-intensity statin among post-hospitalized acute coronary syndrome patients.住院后急性冠脉综合征患者使用高强度他汀类药物的成本效用分析。
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Apr 14;76(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00478-2.
3
Cardiovascular Event Recurrence and Costs after First Myocardial Infarction, Ischemic Stroke, or Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Taiwan.
台湾首次心肌梗死、缺血性中风或脑出血后的心血管事件复发率及费用
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 May;39(3):457-468. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202305_39(3).20221021A.
4
The Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility of Statin Drug for the Treatment of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease, A Systematic Review.他汀类药物治疗心血管疾病患者的成本效益和成本效用:一项系统评价
Int J Prev Med. 2021 May 15;12:39. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_125_20. eCollection 2021.