Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are frequently transferred to level 1 trauma centers (L1TC) if they have minor findings on a computerized tomographic scan of the head due to the absence of continuous neurosurgical coverage in community hospitals (CH). We hypothesized that such patients can be safely managed at community hospitals with a qualified Trauma team.
This is a multicentered Retrospective Cohort Study. Patients with mild Traumatic Brain Injury (defined as Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 13-15 at presentation) and with minor findings on head Computerized Tomography (CT) presenting at a L1TC or 4 Community Hospitals between March 1st, 2012 and February 28th, 2014 were included. All these community hospitals are Level III Trauma center with a well-organized trauma team. Minor CT findings were defined as 1) epidural hematoma<2 mm; 2) subarachnoid hemorrhage<2 mm; 3) subdural hematoma<4 mm; 4) intraparenchymal hemorrhage<5 mm; 5) minor pneumocephalus; or 6) linear or minimally depressed skull fracture. Our primary end point was the need for TBI specific interventions in 3 groups of patients: 1) direct admission to the L1TC (L1TC group), 2) those admitted at one of the 4 CH (CH group), and 3) those transferred from CH to L1TC (TRANSFER group). TBI-specific interventions were defined as intracranial pressure monitor (ICP) placement, hyperosmolar therapy, or neurosurgical operation. Our secondary aim was to demonstrate that these patients can be safely managed in Community Hospitals with qualified Trauma teams. We also sought to identify the clinical outcomes in these three groups of patients - in terms of mortality and complications.
A total of 191 patients were included - 39 CH, 64 L1TC and 88 TRANSFER. There was no difference among the groups in terms of TBI-specific interventions: one TRANSFER, four L1TC, and no CH patients required hyperosmolar therapy (p = 0.277). None of the patients required placement of an intracranial pressure monitoring device (ICP) or a neurosurgical operation and complications and mortality rates were similar among the groups.
Patients with mild TBI and minor findings on head CT can be safely managed at CH with qualified Trauma Teams.
Therapeutic/Care Management Study, Level IVhbv.
由于社区医院(CH)缺乏连续的神经外科覆盖,轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者如果头部计算机断层扫描(CT)有轻微发现,通常会转移到 1 级创伤中心(L1TC)。我们假设,具有合格创伤团队的社区医院可以安全地管理此类患者。
这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究。纳入 2012 年 3 月 1 日至 2014 年 2 月 28 日期间在 L1TC 或 4 家社区医院就诊的轻度创伤性脑损伤(定义为就诊时格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS] 13-15)且头部 CT 有轻微发现的患者。所有这些社区医院都是三级创伤中心,有组织良好的创伤团队。轻微 CT 发现定义为 1)硬膜外血肿<2mm;2)蛛网膜下腔出血<2mm;3)硬膜下血肿<4mm;4)脑实质内出血<5mm;5)少量气颅;或 6)线性或轻度凹陷性颅骨骨折。我们的主要终点是三组患者中需要 TBI 特定干预的情况:1)直接收入 L1TC(L1TC 组),2)收入 4 家 CH 之一的患者(CH 组),以及 3)从 CH 转入 L1TC 的患者(转移组)。TBI 特定干预措施定义为颅内压监测仪(ICP)放置、高渗治疗或神经外科手术。我们的次要目的是证明这些患者可以在具有合格创伤团队的社区医院中安全管理。我们还试图确定这三组患者的临床结果 - 死亡率和并发症。
共纳入 191 名患者 - 39 名 CH、64 名 L1TC 和 88 名转移组。三组之间 TBI 特定干预措施无差异:1 名转移组、4 名 L1TC 和无 CH 患者需要高渗治疗(p=0.277)。没有患者需要放置颅内压监测仪(ICP)或神经外科手术,且并发症和死亡率在各组之间相似。
头部 CT 有轻微发现的轻度 TBI 患者可以在具有合格创伤团队的 CH 中安全管理。
治疗/护理管理研究,IVhbv 级。