Kabalcı Mehmet, Canbeyli İbrahim Deniz, Eroğlu Erdinç
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medicine Faculty of Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medicine Faculty of Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018 Sep 16;26(4):571-578. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.16049. eCollection 2018 Oct.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the antibacterial effects of mesenchymal stem cells, compared to tigecycline, on graft infection related with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in a rat model.
A total of 42 male adult Wistar rats (age >6 months; weight 300 to 350 g) were divided into six groups including seven rats in each. Group 0 did not undergo any procedure; Group 1 was infected, but untreated; Group 2 was infected and treated with tigecycline without graft placement; Group 3 was infected and received mesenchymal stem cells without graft placement; Group 4 was infected and treated with tigecycline after graft placement; Group 5 was infected and treated with mesenchymal stem cells after graft placement. The pockets created were either left empty or implanted with Dacron grafts. Treatment was commenced at 48 h. Specimens were collected on Day 13. Perigraft tissues were evaluated histopathologically and bacterial colony numbers were counted.
No bacterial colonization was observed in Group 0, whereas there was a significant colonization in Group 1. Complete eradication was achieved in Group 2 and Group 3 (graft-free groups), and near-complete eradication was achieved in Group 4 and Group 5 (graft-implanted groups). The histopathological findings significantly differed between Group 1-Group 2 and between Group 1-Group 3 (graft-free groups). The histopathological findings were similar between Group 2-Group 3 and between Group 4-Group 5.
Our study results suggest that mesenchymal stem cells may be a novel, contemporary alternative to antibiotherapy and may decrease the bio-burden of Staphylococcus at the infected graft areas, and mesenchymal stem cell treatment may be as effective as tigecycline.
在本研究中,我们旨在与替加环素相比,研究间充质干细胞对大鼠模型中耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌相关移植物感染的抗菌作用。
总共42只成年雄性Wistar大鼠(年龄>6个月;体重300至350克)被分为六组,每组七只。第0组未进行任何手术;第1组被感染,但未接受治疗;第2组被感染,接受替加环素治疗且未植入移植物;第3组被感染,接受间充质干细胞治疗且未植入移植物;第4组被感染,植入移植物后接受替加环素治疗;第5组被感染,植入移植物后接受间充质干细胞治疗。所形成的腔隙要么保持空的,要么植入涤纶移植物。在48小时开始治疗。在第13天收集标本。对移植物周围组织进行组织病理学评估并计算细菌菌落数。
第0组未观察到细菌定植,而第1组有显著定植。第2组和第3组(无移植物组)实现了完全根除,第4组和第5组(植入移植物组)实现了近乎完全根除。第1组与第2组之间以及第1组与第3组之间(无移植物组)的组织病理学结果有显著差异。第2组与第3组之间以及第4组与第5组之间的组织病理学结果相似。
我们的研究结果表明,间充质干细胞可能是一种新型的当代抗菌治疗替代方法,可能会降低感染移植物区域葡萄球菌的生物负荷,并且间充质干细胞治疗可能与替加环素一样有效。