• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响癌症幸存者护理计划实施的因素:一项全国护理模式研究。

Factors Influencing Delivery of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans: A National Patterns of Care Study.

作者信息

Benci Joseph L, Vachani Carolyn C, Hampshire Margaret K, Bach Christina, Arnold-Korzeniowski Karen, Metz James M, Hill-Kayser Christine E

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 31;9:1577. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01577. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2019.01577
PMID:32083018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7005073/
Abstract

Nearly half of all Americans will develop cancer at least once in their lifetime. Through improved screening and treatments, the number of cancer survivors is reaching all-time highs. However, survivorship care plans (SCPs) are inconsistently used, denying many survivors access to critical information. This study used 46,408 SCPs generated from 2007 to 2016 and applied machine learning to identify predictors of SCP creation, including cancer type, type of physician, and healthcare center where they received care, as well as regional variations in care plan creation. Identifying these disparities in SCP use is a critical first step in efforts toward expanding access to survivorship care planning. Using a convenience sample of survivors, it is possible to model the factors that predict generation of SCPs either by the survivor or by a healthcare provider. This study identifies several important disparities both survivor intrinsic such as cancer type, as well as treatment associated and geographic differences in SCP generation. Identifying these disparities at the national level across cancer types will allow for more targeted recommendations to improve SCP creation and dissemination in underserved groups.

摘要

近一半的美国人一生中至少会患一次癌症。通过改进筛查和治疗,癌症幸存者的数量达到了历史最高水平。然而,生存护理计划(SCPs)的使用并不一致,导致许多幸存者无法获得关键信息。本研究使用了2007年至2016年生成的46408份SCP,并应用机器学习来识别SCP创建的预测因素,包括癌症类型、医生类型以及他们接受治疗的医疗中心,以及护理计划创建的地区差异。识别SCP使用中的这些差异是扩大生存护理计划获取机会的关键第一步。使用幸存者的便利样本,可以对预测SCP由幸存者或医疗服务提供者生成的因素进行建模。本研究确定了几个重要的差异,包括幸存者内在因素如癌症类型,以及SCP生成中的治疗相关和地理差异。在全国范围内识别不同癌症类型的这些差异,将有助于提出更有针对性的建议,以改善SCP在服务不足群体中的创建和传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f6/7005073/d0a15795e275/fonc-09-01577-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f6/7005073/5526fd27e747/fonc-09-01577-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f6/7005073/1e6251d3ba64/fonc-09-01577-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f6/7005073/d0a15795e275/fonc-09-01577-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f6/7005073/5526fd27e747/fonc-09-01577-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f6/7005073/1e6251d3ba64/fonc-09-01577-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6f6/7005073/d0a15795e275/fonc-09-01577-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Influencing Delivery of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans: A National Patterns of Care Study.影响癌症幸存者护理计划实施的因素:一项全国护理模式研究。
Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 31;9:1577. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01577. eCollection 2019.
2
Survivorship care planning in skin cancer: An unbiased statistical approach to identifying patterns of care-plan use.皮肤癌的生存护理计划:一种识别护理计划使用模式的无偏统计方法。
Cancer. 2018 Jan 1;124(1):183-191. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30985. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
3
Identifying barriers to cancer survivors sharing their survivorship care plans with their healthcare provider.确定癌症幸存者与医疗服务提供者分享生存护理计划的障碍。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Oct;12(5):632-638. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0699-3. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
4
Barriers and facilitators to the use of survivorship care plans by hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors and clinicians.造血干细胞移植幸存者和临床医生使用生存护理计划的障碍和促进因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1323-1330. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06492-3. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
5
Survivor and Clinician Assessment of Survivorship Care Plans for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: An Engineering, Primary Care, and Oncology Collaborative for Survivorship Health.造血干细胞移植患者生存者和临床医生对生存者护理计划的评估:一个针对生存者健康的工程学、初级保健和肿瘤学协作。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jun;25(6):1240-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
An Assessment to Inform Pediatric Cancer Provider Development and Delivery of Survivor Care Plans.一项为儿科癌症医疗服务提供者制定和提供幸存者护理计划提供参考的评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):677-84. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0829-9.
7
Survivorship after treatment of pancreatic cancer: insights via an Internet-based survivorship care plan tool.胰腺癌治疗后的生存情况:通过基于互联网的生存护理计划工具获得的见解
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Oct;8(5):890-896. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.08.07.
8
A structural equation modeling approach to understanding pathways linking survivorship care plans to survivor-level outcomes.采用结构方程建模方法理解生存护理计划与生存者水平结局之间的关联途径。
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Dec;14(6):834-846. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00896-6. Epub 2020 May 30.
9
Factors influencing implementation of a survivorship care plan-a quantitative process evaluation of the ROGY Care trial.影响生存护理计划实施的因素——ROGY Care试验的定量过程评估
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Feb;11(1):64-73. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0562-3. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
10
Communicating Critical Information to Cancer Survivors: an Assessment of Survivorship Care Plans in Use in Diverse Healthcare Settings.将关键信息传达给癌症幸存者:不同医疗保健环境中使用的生存护理计划评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Oct;36(5):981-989. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01725-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Survivorship care plan utilization in Australia and New Zealand: survivors', parents' and healthcare providers' perspectives.澳大利亚和新西兰的癌症幸存者护理计划应用情况:幸存者、家长及医疗服务提供者的观点
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 12;33(3):182. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09238-7.
2
Evaluating differences in receipt of survivorship care plan among cancer survivors with and without disabilities.评估有残疾和无残疾的癌症幸存者获得生存护理计划的差异。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 5;32(10):637. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08796-6.
3
Voices of Black men: reflecting on prostate cancer survivorship care plans.

本文引用的文献

1
Survivorship care planning in skin cancer: An unbiased statistical approach to identifying patterns of care-plan use.皮肤癌的生存护理计划:一种识别护理计划使用模式的无偏统计方法。
Cancer. 2018 Jan 1;124(1):183-191. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30985. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
2
Cancer Incidence and Survival Trends by Subtype Using Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program, 1992-2013.利用监测、流行病学与最终结果计划(1992 - 2013年)的数据,按亚型划分的癌症发病率和生存趋势
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Apr;26(4):632-641. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0520. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
Factors influencing implementation of a survivorship care plan-a quantitative process evaluation of the ROGY Care trial.
黑人男性的声音:对前列腺癌幸存者护理计划的反思
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01624-0.
4
Survivorship after adolescent and young adult cancer: models of care, disparities, and opportunities.青少年及青年期癌症患者生存状况:照护模式、差异与机遇。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Sep 1;116(9):1417-1428. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae119.
5
Identifying contributors to disparities in patient access of online medical records: examining the role of clinician encouragement.确定影响患者获取在线病历差异的因素:审视临床医生鼓励所起的作用。
JAMIA Open. 2023 Jul 7;6(3):ooad049. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad049. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Predictors and impact of survivorship care plans and survivorship care visits.生存护理计划和生存护理访视的预测因素和影响。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun;18(3):836-843. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01334-z. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
7
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Health Equity in Oncology: Scoping Review.人工智能对肿瘤学中健康公平性的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 1;24(11):e39748. doi: 10.2196/39748.
影响生存护理计划实施的因素——ROGY Care试验的定量过程评估
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Feb;11(1):64-73. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0562-3. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
Psychological distress among adult cancer survivors: importance of survivorship care plan.成年癌症幸存者的心理困扰:生存护理计划的重要性。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Nov;24(11):4523-31. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3291-2. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
5
Impact of an Automatically Generated Cancer Survivorship Care Plan on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice: Longitudinal Outcomes of a Pragmatic, Cluster Randomized Trial.自动生成的癌症生存护理计划对常规临床实践中患者报告结局的影响:一项实用、集群随机试验的纵向结局。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3550-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.3399. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Survivorship care planning and its influence on long-term patient-reported outcomes among colorectal and lung cancer survivors: the CanCORS disease-free survivor follow-up study.生存护理计划及其对结直肠癌和肺癌幸存者长期患者报告结局的影响:CanCORS无病生存者随访研究
J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Jun;9(2):269-78. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0406-y. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
7
Provision and discussion of survivorship care plans among cancer survivors: results of a nationally representative survey of oncologists and primary care physicians.癌症幸存者的生存护理计划的提供和讨论:一项针对肿瘤学家和初级保健医生的全国代表性调查结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 20;32(15):1578-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7540. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
8
Determinants of survivorship care plan use in US cancer programs.美国癌症项目中生存护理计划使用的决定因素。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Dec;29(4):720-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0645-7.
9
Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care.美国的癌症幸存者:贯穿整个生存轨迹的流行率及其对护理的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Apr;22(4):561-70. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1356. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
10
Patient perspectives on breast cancer treatment plan and summary documents in community oncology care: a pilot program.患者对社区肿瘤治疗计划和总结文件的看法:一个试点项目。
Cancer. 2013 Jan 1;119(1):164-72. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27856. Epub 2012 Nov 29.