Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Dallas, TX, USA.
Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Dec;14(6):834-846. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00896-6. Epub 2020 May 30.
Several high-profile organizations have mandated the delivery of survivorship care plans (SCPs) despite mixed evidence regarding the effectiveness of SCPs on key survivor-level outcomes. There is a need to understand the types of survivor-level outcomes the SCPs are likely to change. Informed by existing frameworks and the literature, the objective of this study was to understand the pathways linking the receipt of a SCP to key survivor-level outcomes including patient-centered communication (PCC), health self-efficacy, changes in health behaviors, and improvements in overall health.
We used structural equation modeling to test the direct and indirect pathways linking the receipt of an SCP to patient-centered communication (PCC), health self-efficacy, and latent measures of health behaviors and physical health in a nationally representative sample of breast and colorectal cancer survivors from the Health Information National Trends Survey.
The receipt of an SCP did not have a significant effect on key survivor-level outcomes and was removed from the final structural model. The final structural model fit the data adequately well (Chi-square p value = 0.03, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = .88, and WRMR = 0.73). PCC had a significant direct effect on physical health but not on health behaviors. Health self-efficacy had a significant direct effect on physical health and health behaviors.
The receipt of an SCP alone is unlikely to facilitate changes in PCC, health self-efficacy, health behaviors, or physical health.
A SCP is a single component of a larger model of survivorship care and should be accompanied by ongoing efforts that promote PCC, health self-efficacy, and changes in health behaviors resulting in improvements to physical health.
尽管生存护理计划(SCP)在关键生存者水平结局方面的有效性存在混合证据,但一些知名组织仍强制要求提供 SCP。有必要了解 SCP 可能改变的生存者水平结局类型。本研究旨在根据现有框架和文献,了解从接受 SCP 到关键生存者水平结局(包括以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)、健康自我效能、健康行为改变和整体健康改善)的路径,这些结局包括以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)、健康自我效能和健康行为及身体健康的潜在衡量指标。
我们使用结构方程模型来测试在全国代表性的乳腺癌和结直肠癌幸存者样本中,接受 SCP 与以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)、健康自我效能以及健康行为和身体健康的潜在衡量指标之间的直接和间接途径。该样本来自健康信息国家趋势调查。
接受 SCP 对关键生存者水平结局没有显著影响,因此从最终结构模型中删除。最终的结构模型很好地拟合了数据(卡方 p 值=0.03,RMSEA=0.07,CFI=0.88,WRMR=0.73)。PCC 对身体健康有显著的直接影响,但对健康行为没有影响。健康自我效能对身体健康和健康行为有显著的直接影响。
仅接受 SCP 不太可能促进 PCC、健康自我效能、健康行为或身体健康的改变。
SCP 是生存护理模式的一个组成部分,应该伴随着促进以患者为中心的沟通、健康自我效能和健康行为改变的持续努力,从而改善身体健康。