Suppr超能文献

采用结构方程建模方法理解生存护理计划与生存者水平结局之间的关联途径。

A structural equation modeling approach to understanding pathways linking survivorship care plans to survivor-level outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Dallas, TX, USA.

Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Dec;14(6):834-846. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00896-6. Epub 2020 May 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Several high-profile organizations have mandated the delivery of survivorship care plans (SCPs) despite mixed evidence regarding the effectiveness of SCPs on key survivor-level outcomes. There is a need to understand the types of survivor-level outcomes the SCPs are likely to change. Informed by existing frameworks and the literature, the objective of this study was to understand the pathways linking the receipt of a SCP to key survivor-level outcomes including patient-centered communication (PCC), health self-efficacy, changes in health behaviors, and improvements in overall health.

METHODS

We used structural equation modeling to test the direct and indirect pathways linking the receipt of an SCP to patient-centered communication (PCC), health self-efficacy, and latent measures of health behaviors and physical health in a nationally representative sample of breast and colorectal cancer survivors from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

RESULTS

The receipt of an SCP did not have a significant effect on key survivor-level outcomes and was removed from the final structural model. The final structural model fit the data adequately well (Chi-square p value = 0.03, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = .88, and WRMR = 0.73). PCC had a significant direct effect on physical health but not on health behaviors. Health self-efficacy had a significant direct effect on physical health and health behaviors.

CONCLUSION

The receipt of an SCP alone is unlikely to facilitate changes in PCC, health self-efficacy, health behaviors, or physical health.

IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

A SCP is a single component of a larger model of survivorship care and should be accompanied by ongoing efforts that promote PCC, health self-efficacy, and changes in health behaviors resulting in improvements to physical health.

摘要

目的

尽管生存护理计划(SCP)在关键生存者水平结局方面的有效性存在混合证据,但一些知名组织仍强制要求提供 SCP。有必要了解 SCP 可能改变的生存者水平结局类型。本研究旨在根据现有框架和文献,了解从接受 SCP 到关键生存者水平结局(包括以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)、健康自我效能、健康行为改变和整体健康改善)的路径,这些结局包括以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)、健康自我效能和健康行为及身体健康的潜在衡量指标。

方法

我们使用结构方程模型来测试在全国代表性的乳腺癌和结直肠癌幸存者样本中,接受 SCP 与以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)、健康自我效能以及健康行为和身体健康的潜在衡量指标之间的直接和间接途径。该样本来自健康信息国家趋势调查。

结果

接受 SCP 对关键生存者水平结局没有显著影响,因此从最终结构模型中删除。最终的结构模型很好地拟合了数据(卡方 p 值=0.03,RMSEA=0.07,CFI=0.88,WRMR=0.73)。PCC 对身体健康有显著的直接影响,但对健康行为没有影响。健康自我效能对身体健康和健康行为有显著的直接影响。

结论

仅接受 SCP 不太可能促进 PCC、健康自我效能、健康行为或身体健康的改变。

对癌症幸存者的启示

SCP 是生存护理模式的一个组成部分,应该伴随着促进以患者为中心的沟通、健康自我效能和健康行为改变的持续努力,从而改善身体健康。

相似文献

1
A structural equation modeling approach to understanding pathways linking survivorship care plans to survivor-level outcomes.
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Dec;14(6):834-846. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00896-6. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Receipt of a survivorship care plan and self-reported health behaviors among cancer survivors.
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Apr;13(2):180-186. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00740-6. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
5
Care Coordination for Breast Cancer Survivors in Urban Underserved Communities: Will Treatment Summaries and Survivorship Care Plans Be Enough?
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Jun;7(3):577-583. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00687-5. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
8
Identifying barriers to cancer survivors sharing their survivorship care plans with their healthcare provider.
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Oct;12(5):632-638. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0699-3. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
9
Survivorship care plans: are randomized controlled trials assessing outcomes that are relevant to stakeholders?
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Aug;12(4):495-508. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0688-6. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Survivorship care plan outcomes for primary care physicians, cancer survivors, and systems: a scoping review.
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Jun;12(3):334-347. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0673-5. Epub 2018 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

3
Relationship Between Satisfaction With Medical Care, Physical Health, and Emotional Well-Being in Adult Men: Mediating Role of Communication.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221114850. doi: 10.1177/21501319221114850.

本文引用的文献

2
Systematic Review of the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans on Health Outcomes and Health Care Delivery.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2088-2100. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7482. Epub 2018 May 18.
3
Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review.
Support Care Cancer. 2018 May;26(5):1585-1595. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3999-7. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
4
Modeling multiple health behaviors and general health.
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
5
Understanding the influences and impact of patient-clinician communication in cancer care.
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1385-1392. doi: 10.1111/hex.12579. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Assessing Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Measures for Surveillance of Communication Outcomes.
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Dec;12(12):1198-1202. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.013334. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
7
Predictors of Satisfaction With Doctor and Nurse Communication: A National Study.
Health Commun. 2017 Oct;32(10):1217-1224. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1215001. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
8
Health Self-Efficacy Among Populations with Multiple Chronic Conditions: the Value of Patient-Centered Communication.
Adv Ther. 2016 Aug;33(8):1440-51. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0369-7. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
9
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验