Hill Rebecca E, Fardell Joanna E, Mercieca-Bebber Rebecca, Wakefield Claire E, Signorelli Christina, Webber Kate, Johnston Karen A, Cohn Richard J
School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Kids Cancer Centre, Behavioural Sciences Unit, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney , NSW, Australia.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 12;33(3):182. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09238-7.
As part of survivorship care, many health authorities recommend survivorship care plans (SCPs). The aim of this study was to understand survivors' SCP receipt and use, clinical/demographic factors associated with use, and providers' SCP practices.
We surveyed Australian and New Zealand survivors of adult and childhood cancer (including parent proxies for survivors aged < 16 years). We fitted binomial logistic regression models to examine the relationship between survivors' clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, and SCP receipt. We also surveyed oncology health providers regarding current SCP provision practices, perceived receipt, and usefulness.
We recruited 1123 cancer survivors (499 adult cancer survivors and 624 childhood cancer survivors, including 222 parent proxies) and 21 healthcare providers. 10.7% of adult and 22.0% of childhood cancer survivors recalled receiving SCPs. SCP receipt was more likely for adult cancer survivors diagnosed with prostate cancer, low-risk cancer diagnoses and older at study participation, and childhood cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy or younger at study participation. Across both groups, a higher level of education attainment was predictive of SCP use. Most healthcare providers estimated that < 15% of adult and > 75% of childhood cancer survivors received SCPs.
Few survivors of adult or childhood cancer reported receiving a SCP, and there were sociodemographic and clinical differences in those who did and did not receive and use their SCP. SCP recipients used and valued them, but healthcare providers indicated potential areas for improvement with SCP provision. Consideration may be needed regarding SCP format, presentation and content.
作为生存护理的一部分,许多卫生当局推荐生存护理计划(SCP)。本研究的目的是了解幸存者对SCP的接受和使用情况、与使用相关的临床/人口统计学因素以及提供者的SCP实践。
我们对澳大利亚和新西兰的成年及儿童癌症幸存者(包括16岁以下幸存者的家长代理人)进行了调查。我们拟合了二项逻辑回归模型,以检验幸存者的临床和社会人口统计学特征与SCP接受情况之间的关系。我们还就当前SCP的提供实践、感知的接受情况和有用性对肿瘤健康提供者进行了调查。
我们招募了1123名癌症幸存者(499名成年癌症幸存者和624名儿童癌症幸存者,包括222名家长代理人)和21名医疗保健提供者。10.7%的成年癌症幸存者和22.0%的儿童癌症幸存者回忆起接受过SCP。被诊断患有前列腺癌、低风险癌症诊断且参与研究时年龄较大的成年癌症幸存者,以及接受化疗或参与研究时年龄较小的儿童癌症幸存者更有可能接受SCP。在两组中,较高的教育程度可预测SCP的使用。大多数医疗保健提供者估计,成年癌症幸存者中<15%、儿童癌症幸存者中>75%接受了SCP。
很少有成年或儿童癌症幸存者报告接受过SCP,接受和未接受及使用SCP的幸存者在社会人口统计学和临床方面存在差异。接受SCP的人使用并重视它们,但医疗保健提供者指出了SCP提供方面可能需要改进的领域。可能需要考虑SCP的格式、呈现方式和内容。