• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于树脂和清漆的玻璃离子水门汀表面保护剂的比较评价——分光光度分析

A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement - a spectrophotometric analysis.

作者信息

Tyagi Shreya, Thomas Abi M, Sinnappah-Kang Neeta Devi

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Christian Dental College, Ludhiana, India.

Betty Cowan Research and Innovation Centre, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India.

出版信息

Biomater Investig Dent. 2020 Jan 11;7(1):25-30. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760
PMID:32083252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7006751/
Abstract

To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The different surface protective agents used were: Vaseline, GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish), G-Coat Plus™ (resin) and EQUIA Coat (resin). Thirty-six identical specimens of GIC were made. Six specimens were used in preparation of standard solution and remaining thirty were divided into five groups with six specimens in each group. Each test specimen was coated with one of the surface protecting agent except for the control group. The specimens were immersed separately into 1 ml of 0.05% methylene blue solution for 24 h and then rinsed with deionised water and further immersed into tubes containing 1 ml of 65% nitric acid. Specimens, once completely dissolved in nitric acid solution, were filtered and centrifuged. The supernatant was used to determine the absorbance using a spectrophotometer. The effectiveness of the surface protecting agents for the GIC was recorded in micrograms of dye per specimen, where low values indicate good protection. Tukey HSD test revealed that GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish; mean = 21.25 µg/ml), G-Coat Plus™ (resin; mean = 30.39 µg/ml) and EQUIA Coat (resin; mean = 9.32 µg/ml) were statistically not significantly different to each other and were effective in protecting the surface of GIC. The study found that there was a statistically significant difference between control and GC Fuji VARNISH™, G-Coat Plus™ and EQUIA Coat. The three agents were found to be equally effective in protecting the surface of GIC.

摘要

评估并比较树脂基和清漆基表面保护剂对玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)的有效性。所使用的不同表面保护剂有:凡士林、GC Fuji VARNISH™(清漆)、G-Coat Plus™(树脂)和EQUIA Coat(树脂)。制作了36个相同的GIC标本。6个标本用于制备标准溶液,其余30个分为五组,每组6个标本。除对照组外,每个测试标本都涂有其中一种表面保护剂。将标本分别浸入1毫升0.05%的亚甲蓝溶液中24小时,然后用去离子水冲洗,再浸入装有1毫升65%硝酸的试管中。标本完全溶解在硝酸溶液后,进行过滤和离心。用上清液通过分光光度计测定吸光度。表面保护剂对GIC的有效性以每个标本中染料的微克数记录,数值越低表明保护效果越好。Tukey HSD检验显示,GC Fuji VARNISH™(清漆;平均值 = 21.25微克/毫升)、G-Coat Plus™(树脂;平均值 = 30.39微克/毫升)和EQUIA Coat(树脂;平均值 = 9.32微克/毫升)在统计学上彼此无显著差异,且在保护GIC表面方面有效。研究发现,对照组与GC Fuji VARNISH™、G-Coat Plus™和EQUIA Coat之间存在统计学显著差异。发现这三种试剂在保护GIC表面方面同样有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1de/7006751/1cf7cd0dacf2/IABO_A_1711760_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1de/7006751/bf3ed59738ad/IABO_A_1711760_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1de/7006751/1cf7cd0dacf2/IABO_A_1711760_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1de/7006751/bf3ed59738ad/IABO_A_1711760_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1de/7006751/1cf7cd0dacf2/IABO_A_1711760_F0002_B.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement - a spectrophotometric analysis.基于树脂和清漆的玻璃离子水门汀表面保护剂的比较评价——分光光度分析
Biomater Investig Dent. 2020 Jan 11;7(1):25-30. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760. eCollection 2020.
2
Effect of enamel surface coating on staining capability due to iron containing supplements on primary teeth: An study.乳牙釉质表面涂层对含铁补充剂所致染色能力的影响:一项研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2023 Apr-Jun;41(2):163-169. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_173_23.
3
Glass ionomer cement surface protection.玻璃离子水门汀表面保护
Am J Dent. 1994 Aug;7(4):203-6.
4
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and surface microhardness of EQUIA Forte, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with conventional glass-ionomer cement.EQUIA Forte(一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀)与传统玻璃离子水门汀的抗压强度和表面显微硬度的比较评估
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jul-Sep;37(3):265-270. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_342_18.
5
Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer with Nano Filled Coat and Varnish.含纳米填料涂层和清漆的玻璃离子水门汀的氟释放
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018 Dec;52(4):307-313. doi: 10.15644/asc52/4/4.
6
Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.树脂复合材料与近期高粘度玻璃离子水门汀之间的抗剪粘结强度和界面分析,以及各种粘结系统的粘结效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jun;23(6):2599-2608. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2678-5. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
7
Surface micromorphological changes of glass ionomer following application of 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride: a scanning electron microscope study.应用1.23% 酸蚀磷酸氟后玻璃离子水门汀的表面微观形态变化:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Jul-Aug;25(4):493-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.142545.
8
Spectrophotometric assessment of different surface coating materials on conventional glass ionomer cement.传统玻璃离子水门汀上不同表面涂层材料的分光光度评估
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2016 Sep;29(5 Suppl):1823-1827.
9
Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material.增强型玻璃离子体齿科修复材料物理性能的比较评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Aug;122(2):154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
Effectiveness of surface protection for resin-modified glass-ionomer materials.树脂改性玻璃离子材料表面保护的有效性。
Quintessence Int. 1999 Jun;30(6):427-31.

引用本文的文献

1
The in vitro assessment of resin coating materials containing calcium phosphate, bioactive glass, and polylysine for glass ionomer cement restorations.含磷酸钙、生物活性玻璃和聚赖氨酸的树脂涂层材料用于玻璃离子水门汀修复体的体外评估。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2025 Jan 14;12:42783. doi: 10.2340/biid.v12.42783. eCollection 2025.
2
The development of resin-coating materials for enhancing elemental release of coated glass ionomer cements.用于增强涂层玻璃离子水门汀元素释放的树脂涂层材料的研发。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(14):e34512. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34512. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
3
Influence of Coating Material Thickness on the Attraction Force of Dental Magnetic Attachment: An In Vitro Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of petroleum jelly, light-cured varnish and different storage media on the flexural strength of glass ionomer dental cements.凡士林、光固化清漆及不同储存介质对玻璃离子水门汀弯曲强度的影响。
Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2016 Mar 29;2(1):55-59. doi: 10.3109/23337931.2016.1160784. eCollection 2016 Dec.
2
A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry.玻璃离子水门汀在临床牙科中的应用综述。
J Funct Biomater. 2016 Jun 28;7(3):16. doi: 10.3390/jfb7030016.
3
Influence of Thermo-Light Curing with Dental Light-Curing Units on the Microhardness of Glass-Ionomer Cements.
涂层材料厚度对口腔磁性附着体吸引力的影响:一项体外研究
Int J Dent. 2024 May 16;2024:3863278. doi: 10.1155/2024/3863278. eCollection 2024.
4
Structural, Physical, and Mechanical Analysis of ZnO and TiO Nanoparticle-Reinforced Self-Adhesive Coating Restorative Material.ZnO和TiO纳米颗粒增强自粘型涂层修复材料的结构、物理及力学分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 7;14(24):7507. doi: 10.3390/ma14247507.
牙科光固化机热光固化对玻璃离子水门汀显微硬度的影响
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):425-30. doi: 10.11607/prd.2405.
4
The effect of surface sealants with different filler content on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.不同填料含量的表面封闭剂对V类树脂复合材料修复体微渗漏的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):163-169. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.178315.
5
Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system.一项为期四年的随机临床试验,旨在评估玻璃离子修复系统的临床性能。
Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):134-43. doi: 10.2341/13-239-C. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
6
The effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on water absorption by teeth restored with glass ionomer.纳米填充树脂基涂层对玻璃离子修复牙齿吸水性的影响。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Apr;145(4):363-70. doi: 10.14219/jada.2043.3.
7
Effect of G-Coat Plus on the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cements.G-Coat Plus 对玻璃离子水门汀力学性能的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2013 Dec;58(4):448-53. doi: 10.1111/adj.12122.
8
A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer.玻璃离子水门汀综述:从传统玻璃离子水门汀到生物活性玻璃离子水门汀。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Jul;10(4):411-20.
9
Effectiveness of commonly available surface protecting agents in maintaining microhardness of two cements.常用表面保护剂对两种水门汀微硬度的维持效果
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 May;23(5):315-8.
10
Effectiveness of surface protection for glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resins.玻璃离子体、树脂改性玻璃离子体和聚酸改性复合树脂表面保护的有效性。
Dent Mater J. 2009 Jan;28(1):96-101.