• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同类别抗高血压药物使用者心血管事件的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparison of Cardiovascular Events Among Users of Different Classes of Antihypertension Medications: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Emory Global Diabetes Research Center, Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1921618. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21618.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21618
PMID:32083689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7043193/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Antihypertension medications have been associated with prevention of cardiovascular events, although less is known about the comparative effectiveness of different medication classes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare contemporary aggregated first-in-trial cardiovascular events among patients with hypertension and no substantial comorbidities.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles published between January 1, 1990, and October 24, 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials that tested commonly used antihypertension medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, β-blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, and diuretics) and that reported selected cardiovascular outcomes for at least 6 months of follow-up.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The analysis was conducted from October 2017 to December 2019. Two reviewers extracted the number of cardiovascular events at the end of treatment for all study groups. For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was used to compare risk reductions between medication classes (random-effects models weighted by the inverse variance). The dose-response association between a 10-mm Hg reduction of systolic blood pressure and a 5-mm Hg reduction of diastolic blood pressure and the risk of first-in-trial cardiovascular events was estimated.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

First-in-trial cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization.

RESULTS

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, data were pooled from 46 eligible clinical trials (248 887 total participants with a mean [SD] age of 65.6 [5.8] years; 52.8% men). In the network meta-analysis, compared with placebo, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics were reported to be similarly effective in reducing overall cardiovascular events (25%), cardiovascular death (20%), and stroke (35%); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were reported to be the most effective in reducing the risk of myocardial infarction (28%); and diuretics were reported to be the most effective in reducing revascularization (33%). In the metaregression analyses, each 10-mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure and 5-mm Hg reduction in diastolic blood pressure was significantly associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death, stroke, and overall cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this network meta-analysis of clinical trials of patients with hypertension and no substantial comorbidities, different classes of antihypertension medications were associated with similar benefits in reducing cardiovascular events. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of combinations of antihypertension medications in reducing cardiovascular events.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9670/7043193/1df2a52e7666/jamanetwopen-3-e1921618-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9670/7043193/8639abefcd58/jamanetwopen-3-e1921618-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9670/7043193/e4b30b490ac0/jamanetwopen-3-e1921618-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9670/7043193/1df2a52e7666/jamanetwopen-3-e1921618-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9670/7043193/8639abefcd58/jamanetwopen-3-e1921618-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9670/7043193/e4b30b490ac0/jamanetwopen-3-e1921618-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9670/7043193/1df2a52e7666/jamanetwopen-3-e1921618-g003.jpg
摘要

重要性

抗高血压药物与预防心血管事件有关,尽管对于不同药物类别的比较有效性知之甚少。

目的

比较无明显合并症的高血压患者的第一代临床试验中综合心血管事件。

数据来源

系统地检索了 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 10 月 24 日期间发表在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中的文章。

研究选择

随机临床试验,测试常用的抗高血压药物(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂、非二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和利尿剂),并报告至少 6 个月随访的选定心血管结局。

数据提取和综合

分析于 2017 年 10 月至 2019 年 12 月进行。两名审查员提取了所有研究组治疗结束时心血管事件的数量。对于每个结局,使用随机效应模型(加权反比方差)比较药物类别的风险降低。还估计了收缩压降低 10mmHg 和舒张压降低 5mmHg 与第一代心血管事件风险之间的剂量-反应关联。

主要结果和测量

第一代心血管事件,包括心血管死亡、心肌梗死、中风和血运重建。

结果

在这项系统评价和网络荟萃分析中,从 46 项合格的临床试验中汇总了数据(共有 248887 名参与者,平均年龄[标准差]为 65.6[5.8]岁;52.8%为男性)。在网络荟萃分析中,与安慰剂相比,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂和噻嗪类利尿剂在降低整体心血管事件(25%)、心血管死亡(20%)和中风(35%)方面同样有效;血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在降低心肌梗死风险方面最为有效(28%);利尿剂在降低血运重建风险方面最为有效(33%)。在荟萃回归分析中,收缩压每降低 10mmHg 和舒张压每降低 5mmHg 与心血管死亡、中风和整体心血管事件的风险降低显著相关。

结论和相关性

在这项无明显合并症的高血压患者临床试验的网络荟萃分析中,不同类别的抗高血压药物在降低心血管事件方面具有相似的益处。未来的研究应比较抗高血压药物联合使用在降低心血管事件方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Cardiovascular Events Among Users of Different Classes of Antihypertension Medications: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.不同类别抗高血压药物使用者心血管事件的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1921618. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21618.
2
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.
3
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的一线肾素血管紧张素系统抑制剂与其他一线抗高血压药物类别对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 11;1:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2.
4
Cochrane in context: pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.Cochrane背景下:儿童高血压的药物干预
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):581-3. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1975.
5
Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies.降压药物在心血管疾病预防中的应用:基于前瞻性流行病学研究预期的147项随机试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 2009 May 19;338:b1665. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1665.
6
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub2.
7
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of BP-Lowering Pharmacotherapy in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Dialysis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials.维持性透析患者降压药物治疗的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):1129-1138. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12201019. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Blood pressure-lowering treatment for prevention of major cardiovascular diseases in people with and without type 2 diabetes: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis.降压治疗对 2 型糖尿病与非 2 型糖尿病患者主要心血管疾病预防的影响:一项个体参与者水平数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Sep;10(9):645-654. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00172-3. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
9
Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis.一线降压药类别全面比较效果和安全性:系统的、多国的、大规模分析。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 16;394(10211):1816-1826. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32317-7. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Nebivolol for the Treatment of Essential Systemic Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比索洛尔治疗原发性系统性动脉高血压的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021 Mar;21(2):165-180. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00422-0.

引用本文的文献

1
First-Line β-Blocker Use for Hypertension in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局中一线β受体阻滞剂用于治疗高血压的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529026. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29026.
2
European guidelines for hypertension in 2024: a comparison of key recommendations for clinical practice.《2024年欧洲高血压指南:临床实践关键建议比较》
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41569-025-01187-2.
3
Identifying optimal primary prevention interventions for major cardiovascular disease events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and hierarchical network meta-analysis of RCTs.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis.一线降压药类别全面比较效果和安全性:系统的、多国的、大规模分析。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 16;394(10211):1816-1826. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32317-7. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
2
Fixed Low-Dose Triple Combination Antihypertensive Medication vs Usual Care for Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension in Sri Lanka: A Randomized Clinical Trial.固定低剂量三联抗高血压药物与常规护理治疗斯里兰卡轻中度高血压患者的血压控制:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 14;320(6):566-579. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10359.
3
确定主要心血管疾病事件和全因死亡率的最佳一级预防干预措施:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和分层网络荟萃分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(37):1-65. doi: 10.3310/RLDH7432.
4
Effectiveness and safety of chronic diuretic use in older adults: an umbrella review of recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized-controlled trials.老年人长期使用利尿剂的有效性和安全性:对近期发表的随机对照试验系统评价和荟萃分析的综合评价
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 May 25. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01229-5.
5
Bioequivalence and Food Effect Assessment of Two Fixed-Dose Combination Formulations of Telmisartan-Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets in Chinese Healthy Subjects.替米沙坦-氢氯噻嗪片两种固定剂量复方制剂在中国健康受试者中的生物等效性及食物影响评估。
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 May;18(5):e70228. doi: 10.1111/cts.70228.
6
Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension (2024 revision).《中国高血压防治指南(2024年修订版)》
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 Jan 28;22(1):1-149. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.01.008.
7
Comparative efficacy of different antihypertensive drug classes for stroke prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同类别降压药物预防卒中的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0313309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313309. eCollection 2025.
8
The role of single-pill ACE inhibitor/ccb combination for hypertension: an Algerian view via the nominal group technique.单片复方血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/钙通道阻滞剂治疗高血压的作用:阿尔及利亚通过名义组技术的观点
Future Cardiol. 2025 Mar;21(3):155-166. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2465218. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
9
Association Between Genetically Proxied SLC12A2 Inhibition and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study.基因代理的SLC12A2抑制与炎症性肠病之间的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究
Biochem Genet. 2025 Feb 6. doi: 10.1007/s10528-025-11037-y.
10
Antihypertensive Medication Class and Functional Outcomes After Nonlobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage.非叶性脑出血后的降压药物类别与功能转归
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2457770. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57770.
Implications of the New American College of Cardiology Guidelines for Hypertension Prevalence in India.
新美国心脏病学会高血压指南对印度高血压患病率的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1416-1418. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3511.
4
Impact of 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on prevalence of hypertension and eligibility for antihypertensive treatment in United States and China: nationally representative cross sectional study.2017ACC/AHA 指南对美国和中国高血压患病率及降压治疗适应证的影响:全国代表性横断面研究。
BMJ. 2018 Jul 11;362:k2357. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2357.
5
Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Synopsis of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline.成人高血压的预防、检测、评估和管理:2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南概要。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Mar 6;168(5):351-358. doi: 10.7326/M17-3203. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
6
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师助理学会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年医学会/美国药剂师协会/美国血液学会/美国预防心脏病学会/美国国家医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1269-1324. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata.网络荟萃分析:Stata 应用与实践
Epidemiol Health. 2017 Oct 27;39:e2017047. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2017047. eCollection 2017.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Quarter-Dose Blood Pressure-Lowering Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.小剂量降压药物的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertension. 2017 Jul;70(1):85-93. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09202. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
9
Worldwide prevalence of hypertension exceeds 1.3 billion.全球高血压患病率超过13亿。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 Oct;10(10):753-754. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
10
Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.两种用于拟合具有随机不一致效应的网络荟萃分析模型的新方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jul 28;16:87. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0184-5.