• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒的去中心化实施效果:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of implementing a decentralized delivery of hepatitis C virus treatment with direct-acting antivirals: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

机构信息

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229143. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229143
PMID:32084187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7034833/
Abstract

Direct-acting agents (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment are safe and highly effective. Few studies described the sustained virologic response rates of treatment conducted by non-specialists. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of decentralized strategies of HCV treatment with DAAs. PubMed, Embase, Scopus and LILACS were searched until March-2019. Studies were screened by two researchers according to the following inclusion criteria: HCV treatment using DAAs on real-life cohort studies or clinical trials conducted by non-specialized health personnel. The primary endpoint was the sustained virologic response rate at week 12 after the end-of-treatment (SVR12), which is binary at the patient level. Data were extracted in duplicate using electronic-forms and quality appraisal was performed with the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used for pooling SVR12 rates. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Among the 130 selected studies, nine papers were included for quantitative synthesis. The quality-appraisal was good for two, fair for three and poor for four studies. The pooled relative risk (RR) of SVR12 was not statistically different between decentralized strategy and treatment by specialists [RR = 1.05; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.98-1.1; I2 = 45% (95% CI: 0-84%), p = 0.145]. SVR12 rate for decentralized HCV treatment was 81% [SVR12 95% CI: 72-89%; I2 = 93% (95% CI: 88-96%)] and 95% [SVR12 95%CI: 92-98%; I2 = 77% (95% CI: 52-89%)] with intention to treat analysis and per-protocol analysis, respectively. SVR12 rates using DAAs managed by non-specialized health personnel were satisfactory and similar to those obtained by specialists. This new delivery strategy can improve access to HCV treatment, especially in resource-limited settings. PROSPERO #: CRD42019122609.

摘要

直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗丙型肝炎(HCV)安全且高效。少数研究描述了非专业人员进行的治疗的持续病毒学应答率。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 DAA 去中心化治疗策略的有效性。检索了 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 LILACS,截止日期为 2019 年 3 月。研究由两名研究人员根据以下纳入标准进行筛选:使用 DAA 的 HCV 治疗,真实队列研究或非专业卫生人员进行的临床试验。主要终点是治疗结束后 12 周的持续病毒学应答率(SVR12),这是患者水平上的二分变量。使用电子表格重复提取数据,并使用 NIH 质量评估工具进行质量评估。使用 I2 统计评估异质性。使用随机效应荟萃分析模型对 SVR12 率进行汇总。使用漏斗图评估发表偏倚。在 130 项选定研究中,有 9 篇论文纳入定量综合分析。其中两项研究的质量评估为良好,三项为中等,四项为较差。去中心化策略与专家治疗之间的 SVR12 汇总相对风险(RR)无统计学差异[RR = 1.05;95%置信区间(95%CI):0.98-1.1;I2 = 45%(95%CI:0-84%),p = 0.145]。去中心化 HCV 治疗的 SVR12 率为 81%[SVR12 95%CI:72-89%;I2 = 93%(95%CI:88-96%)]和 95%[SVR12 95%CI:92-98%;I2 = 77%(95%CI:52-89%)],意向治疗分析和方案分析分别。非专业卫生人员管理的 DAA 的 SVR12 率令人满意,与专家获得的结果相似。这种新的治疗策略可以提高 HCV 治疗的可及性,特别是在资源有限的环境中。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019122609。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of implementing a decentralized delivery of hepatitis C virus treatment with direct-acting antivirals: A systematic review with meta-analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒的去中心化实施效果:系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229143. eCollection 2020.
2
Effectiveness of direct-acting agents for chronic hepatitis C treatment in South America: A systematic review and meta-analysis.南美洲直接作用抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Viral Hepat. 2020 Dec;27(12):1396-1407. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13364. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
Decentralisation, integration, and task-shifting in hepatitis C virus infection testing and treatment: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.去中心化、整合和任务转移在丙型肝炎病毒感染检测和治疗中的应用:全球系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Apr;9(4):e431-e445. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30505-2. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals-based antiviral therapies for hepatitis C virus patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗慢性肾脏病 4-5 期丙型肝炎病毒患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Liver Int. 2017 Jul;37(7):974-981. doi: 10.1111/liv.13336. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
5
Effectiveness of Direct-acting Antivirals for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Rwanda: A Retrospective Study.卢旺达慢性丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的效果:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3300-e3307. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa701.
6
A systematic review with meta-analysis: Is ribavirin necessary in sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral therapies for patients with HCV recurrence after liver transplantation?系统评价与荟萃分析:在索磷布韦为基础的直接作用抗病毒治疗中,利巴韦林对肝移植后 HCV 复发患者是否有必要?
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;83:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.03.038. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
7
Direct-acting antivirals for HCV treatment in older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗老年丙型肝炎病毒患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Viral Hepat. 2019 Nov;26(11):1249-1256. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13169. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
8
HCV mono-infected and HIV/HCV co-infected individuals treated with direct-acting antivirals: to what extent do they differ?接受直接抗病毒药物治疗的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)单感染和人类免疫缺陷病毒/丙型肝炎病毒(HIV/HCV)合并感染个体:他们在多大程度上存在差异?
Int J Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;62:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
9
Direct-acting antiviral agents in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1-4 infections in a tertiary hospital.三级医院中丙型肝炎1-4型感染患者使用直接抗病毒药物的情况
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2018 Jun;31(3):226-236. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
Outcomes of Treatment for Hepatitis C in Primary Care, Compared to Hospital-based Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial in People Who Inject Drugs.在基层医疗与医院为基础的医疗之间治疗丙型肝炎的结果比较:一项针对注射吸毒者的随机对照试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;70(9):1900-1906. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz546.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of a prison-based test-and-treat model for enhancing hepatitis C care in Kedah, Malaysia.马来西亚吉打州基于监狱的检测与治疗模式在加强丙型肝炎护理方面的可行性。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):1152. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22296-0.
2
Subspecialty physicians' perspectives on barriers and facilitators of hepatitis C treatment: a qualitative study.亚专科医生对丙型肝炎治疗障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jul 25;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01057-z.
3
An algorithm for simplified hepatitis C virus treatment with non-specialist care based on nation-wide data from Taiwan.

本文引用的文献

1
Design and validation of risk prediction model for hepatocellular carcinoma development after sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C.慢性丙型肝炎患者持续病毒学应答后肝细胞癌发生风险预测模型的设计与验证
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;32(3):378-385. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001512.
2
Innovative strategies for the elimination of viral hepatitis at a national level: A country case series.国家层面消除病毒性肝炎的创新策略:一个国家案例系列。
Liver Int. 2019 Oct;39(10):1818-1836. doi: 10.1111/liv.14222. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
3
Effectiveness of direct-acting agents for hepatitis C and liver stiffness changing after sustained virological response.
基于台湾全国范围内的数据,为非专业医护人员简化丙型肝炎病毒治疗的算法。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Apr;18(2):461-475. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10609-7. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
4
Patients' access to and acceptance of community-based hepatitis C testing and treatment in Myanmar: A mixed-method study.缅甸患者对社区丙型肝炎检测与治疗的可及性及接受度:一项混合方法研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jun 16;3(6):e0000902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000902. eCollection 2023.
5
Assessing feasibility of a modified same-day test-and-treat model for hepatitis C among rural people who inject drugs.评估农村地区注射吸毒人群中改良的当日检测和治疗模型的可行性。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Apr 12;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00780-3.
6
Nurse-led initiation of hepatitis C care in rural Cambodia.柬埔寨农村地区的护士主导的丙型肝炎治疗护理启动。
Bull World Health Organ. 2023 Apr 1;101(4):262-270. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.288956. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
7
Patient outcomes in public sector hepatitis C treatment programmes: a retrospective cohort analysis across five low- and middle-income countries.在五个中低收入国家的公共部门丙型肝炎治疗项目中的患者结局:一项回顾性队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 5;12(12):e062745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062745.
8
Diagnostic performance of two non-invasive biomarkers used individually and in sequential combination for cirrhosis associated with hepatitis C virus infection.两种非侵入性生物标志物单独和序贯联合用于丙型肝炎病毒感染相关肝硬化的诊断性能。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 23;12(1):20153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24612-9.
9
Developing a primary care-initiated hepatitis C treatment pathway in Scotland: a qualitative study.在苏格兰建立由初级保健启动的丙型肝炎治疗途径:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Mar 21;72(722):e668-76. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0044.
10
Hepatitis C virus in India: Challenges and Successes.印度的丙型肝炎病毒:挑战与成就
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2021 Jul 22;18(3):150-154. doi: 10.1002/cld.1137. eCollection 2021 Sep.
直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的疗效及其对持续病毒学应答后肝硬度的影响。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;34(12):2187-2195. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14707. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
4
Long-Term Impact of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agent Therapy in HCV Cirrhosis: Critical Review.慢性丙型肝炎肝硬化直接抗病毒药物治疗的长期影响:关键性综述。
Semin Liver Dis. 2019 Jul;39(3):341-353. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685538. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Current and forthcoming perspectives in linkage to care of hepatitis C virus infection: Assessment of an Italian focus group.当前和即将出现的丙型肝炎病毒感染关联治疗观点:对意大利焦点小组的评估。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Jul;51(7):915-921. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.03.033. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Real-world virological efficacy and safety of daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in Japan.日本慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染患者中达卡他韦/阿舒瑞韦/贝曲布韦的真实世界病毒学疗效和安全性。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;54(8):742-751. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01568-8. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
7
Clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a prospective cohort study.直接作用抗病毒治疗后慢性丙型肝炎患者的临床结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 6;393(10179):1453-1464. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32111-1. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in Rwanda with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (SHARED): a single-arm trial.卢旺达采用 ledipasvir-索非布韦(SHARED)治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染:一项单臂试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;4(2):119-126. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30382-0. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Real-world effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C in Taiwan: Real-world data.台湾地区直接作用抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎的真实世界疗效:真实世界数据。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Aug;53(4):569-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
10
Strategies for achieving viral hepatitis C micro-elimination in the Netherlands.荷兰实现丙型病毒性肝炎微消除的策略。
Hepatol Med Policy. 2018 Sep 29;3:12. doi: 10.1186/s41124-018-0040-9. eCollection 2018.