Suppr超能文献

多态性与乳腺癌风险的关联:病例对照研究的荟萃分析†

Association of Polymorphisms with Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies †.

作者信息

Krishna B Madhu, Jana Samir, Panda Aditya K, Horne David, Awasthi Sanjay, Salgia Ravi, Singhal Sharad S

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Comprehensive Cancer Center and National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.

Department of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Khallikote University, Konisi, Berhampur, Odisha 761008, India.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2020 Feb 18;12(2):471. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020471.

Abstract

Reports on the association of polymorphisms with breast cancer (BC) have been conflicting, inconsistent, inconclusive, and controversial. PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were used to identify studies on polymorphisms and BC risk. Data were extracted independently, and of the initial 3043 studies, 39 case-control studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Information from these studies was extracted, and the overall associations of three polymorphisms ( 29>T/C, -509 C/T, and ) with BC risk were analyzed using overall allele, homozygous, heterozygous, recessive, and dominant models. None of the three polymorphisms studied had a significant influence on the development of BC. However, stratified analysis revealed a positive correlation between the 29T>C polymorphism and BC risk according to a heterozygous model of the Asian population (odds ratio (OR) = 1.115, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.006-1.237, = 0.039). Interestingly, this polymorphism was associated with lower odds of BC according to a heterozygous model of the Middle Eastern population (OR = 0.602, 95% CI = 0.375-0.966, = 0.035). Thus, our analysis of large datasets indicates that the 29T>C polymorphism is significantly associated with BC risk in the Asian population. In contrast, the and polymorphisms failed to show an association with BC.

摘要

关于多态性与乳腺癌(BC)关联的报道一直存在矛盾、不一致、无定论且有争议。使用PubMed、EMBASE和谷歌学术搜索来识别关于多态性与BC风险的研究。数据由独立提取,在最初的3043项研究中,有39项病例对照研究符合纳入荟萃分析的条件。提取这些研究的信息,并使用总体等位基因、纯合子、杂合子、隐性和显性模型分析三种多态性(29>T/C、-509 C/T和)与BC风险的总体关联。所研究的三种多态性均对BC的发生没有显著影响。然而,分层分析显示,根据亚洲人群的杂合子模型,29T>C多态性与BC风险呈正相关(优势比(OR)=1.115,95%置信区间(CI)=1.006-1.237,P=0.039)。有趣的是,根据中东人群的杂合子模型,这种多态性与较低的BC发病几率相关(OR = 0.602,95% CI = 0.375-0.966,P = 0.035)。因此,我们对大型数据集的分析表明,29T>C多态性与亚洲人群的BC风险显著相关。相比之下,和多态性未能显示与BC有关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d30/7072663/6bf8c9ef8a96/cancers-12-00471-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验