Suppr超能文献

通常归因于抑制控制的 BOLD 差异可预测 ADHD 症状,而不是任务导向的抑制控制。

BOLD differences normally attributed to inhibitory control predict symptoms, not task-directed inhibitory control in ADHD.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurodev Disord. 2020 Feb 21;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s11689-020-09311-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Altered brain activity that has been observed in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) while performing cognitive control tasks like the stop signal task (SST) has generally been interpreted as reflecting either weak (under-active) or compensatory (over-active) versions of the same functions as in healthy controls. If so, then regional activities that correlate with the efficiency of inhibitory control (i.e. stop signal reaction time, SSRT) in healthy subjects should also correlate with SSRT in ADHD. Here we test the alternate hypothesis that BOLD (blood-oxygen-level-dependent) differences might instead reflect the redirection of neural processing resources normally used for task-directed inhibitory control, towards actively managing symptomatic behaviour. If so, then activities that correlate with SSRT in TD should instead correlate with inattentive and hyperactive symptoms in ADHD.

METHODS

We used fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) in 14 typically developing (TD) and 14 ADHD adolescents performing the SST, and in a replication sample of 14 healthy adults. First, we identified significant group BOLD differences during all phases of activity in the SST (i.e. warning, response, reactive inhibition, error detection and post-error slowing). Next, we correlated these phases of activity with SSRT in TD and with SSRT, inattentive and hyperactive symptom scores in ADHD. We then identified whole brain significant correlations in regions of significant group difference in activity.

RESULTS

Only three regions of significant group difference were correlated with SSRT in TD and replication groups (left and right inferior frontal gyri (IFG) during error detection and hypothalamus during post-error slowing). Consistent with regions of altered activity managing symptomatic behaviour instead of task-directed behaviour, left IFG correlated with greater inattentive score, right IFG correlated with lower hyperactive score and hypothalamus correlated with greater inattentive score and oppositely correlated with SSRT compared to TD.

CONCLUSIONS

Stimuli that elicit task-directed integration of neural processing in healthy subjects instead appear to be directing integrated function towards managing symptomatic behaviour in ADHD. The ability of the current approach to determine whether altered neural activities reflect comparable functions in ADHD and control groups has broad implications for the development and monitoring of therapeutic interventions.

摘要

背景

在执行认知控制任务(如停止信号任务[SST])时,注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者的大脑活动发生改变,通常被解释为反映了与健康对照组相同功能的较弱(活动不足)或代偿性(过度活跃)版本。如果是这样,那么与健康受试者抑制控制效率(即停止信号反应时间,SSRT)相关的区域活动也应该与 ADHD 中的 SSRT 相关。在这里,我们测试了替代假设,即 BOLD(血氧水平依赖)差异可能反映了用于任务导向抑制控制的神经处理资源的重新定向,以主动管理症状行为。如果是这样,那么与 TD 中的 SSRT 相关的活动应该与 ADHD 中的注意力不集中和多动症状相关。

方法

我们使用 fMRI(功能磁共振成像)对 14 名典型发育(TD)和 14 名 ADHD 青少年进行 SST 测试,并在 14 名健康成年人的复制样本中进行测试。首先,我们确定了 SST 活动的所有阶段(即警告、反应、反应性抑制、错误检测和错误后减速)中具有显著组间 BOLD 差异的区域。接下来,我们将这些活动阶段与 TD 中的 SSRT 以及 ADHD 中的 SSRT、注意力不集中和多动症状评分相关联。然后,我们在活动存在显著组间差异的区域中确定了全脑的显著相关性。

结果

只有三个具有显著组间差异的区域与 TD 和复制组的 SSRT 相关(错误检测时的左、右额下回和错误后减速时的下丘脑)。与管理症状行为而不是任务导向行为的改变区域一致,左额下回与注意力不集中评分较高相关,右额下回与多动评分较低相关,下丘脑与注意力不集中评分较高相关,与 TD 相比,SSRT 呈负相关。

结论

在健康受试者中,引发任务导向的神经处理整合的刺激似乎反而将整合功能引导到 ADHD 中症状行为的管理上。当前方法确定改变的神经活动是否反映了 ADHD 和对照组中类似功能的能力,对治疗干预的发展和监测具有广泛的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f700/7035717/217bec0d31f9/11689_2020_9311_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验