Hartup W W, Laursen B, Stewart M I, Eastenson A
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
Child Dev. 1988 Dec;59(6):1590-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1988.tb03686.x.
The purpose of this investigation was to compare conflicts occurring between young children and their friends to those occurring between nonfriends. 53 children with a median age of 4 years, 3 months were observed and interviewed to determine who were mutual friends, unilateral associates, or neutral associates. 146 conflicts were also observed. Conflicts between mutual friends, as compared to those occurring between neutral associates: (a) did not occur less frequently, differ in length, or differ in the situations that instigated them, but (b) were less intense, were resolved more frequently with disengagement, and more frequently resulted in equal or partially equal outcomes. Continued socialization was also more likely following conflicts between friends. Conflicts between unilateral associates resembled those between nonfriends, although postconflict interaction resembled that between mutual friends. Conflict resolution strategies favored by friends maximize the likelihood that their interaction and their relationships will continue.
本调查的目的是比较幼儿与其朋友之间发生的冲突和非朋友之间发生的冲突。观察并采访了53名中位年龄为4岁3个月的儿童,以确定谁是相互的朋友、单方面的伙伴或中立的伙伴。还观察到了146次冲突。与中立伙伴之间发生的冲突相比,相互的朋友之间的冲突:(a)发生频率并不更低,长度没有差异,引发冲突的情况也没有差异,但(b)强度较小,更多地通过脱离接触得到解决,并且更频繁地导致平等或部分平等的结果。朋友之间发生冲突后,继续交往的可能性也更大。单方面伙伴之间的冲突类似于非朋友之间的冲突,尽管冲突后的互动类似于相互的朋友之间的互动。朋友所青睐的冲突解决策略最大限度地提高了他们的互动及其关系将持续下去的可能性。