Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia.
Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Australia.
Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 21;9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-1283-2.
The best evidence-enhanced recovery care pathway is yet to be defined for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Minimally invasive surgery, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, and early postoperative nutrition have been considered as critical components of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery (ERSS). The objective of this study will be to synthesize the evidence underpinning individual components of a proposed multidisciplinary enhanced recovery pathway for patients undergoing spinal surgery.
This is the study protocol for a systematic review of complex interventions. Our team identified 22 individual care components of a proposed pathway based on clinical practice guidelines and published reviews. We will include systematic reviews and meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in adults or pediatric patients evaluating any one of the pre-determined care components. Our primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality, morbidity outcomes (e.g., pulmonary, cardiac, renal, surgical complications), patient-reported outcomes and experiences (e.g., pain, quality of care experience), and health services outcomes (e.g., length of stay and costs). We will search the following databases (1990 onwards) MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL). Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The risk of bias for individual studies will be appraised using appropriate tools. A narrative synthesis will be provided with the information presented in the text and tables to summarize and explain the characteristics and findings of the included studies. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we do not anticipate to conduct meta-analyses. Confidence in cumulative evidence for each component of care will be classified according to the GRADE system.
This systematic review will identify, evaluate, and integrate the evidence underpinning individual components of a pathway for patients undergoing spinal surgery. The formation of an evidence-based pathway will allow for the standardization of clinical care delivery within the context of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery.
PROSPERO CRD42019135289.
对于接受脊柱手术的患者,最佳的证据增强型康复护理路径尚未确定。微创手术、多模式镇痛、早期活动和早期术后营养被认为是脊柱手术增强康复(ERSS)的关键组成部分。本研究的目的是综合现有证据,为接受脊柱手术的患者制定多学科增强康复路径。
这是一项复杂干预措施系统评价的研究方案。我们的团队根据临床实践指南和已发表的综述,确定了拟议途径的 22 个单独护理组件。我们将纳入评价任何预定护理组件的成人或儿科患者的系统评价和荟萃分析、随机对照试验、非随机对照试验和观察性研究。我们的主要结局将是全因死亡率、发病率结局(如肺部、心脏、肾脏、手术并发症)、患者报告的结局和体验(如疼痛、护理体验质量)以及卫生服务结局(如住院时间和成本)。我们将搜索以下数据库(1990 年以后):MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆(Cochrane 系统评价数据库和 CENTRAL)。两名评审员将独立筛选所有引文、全文文章和摘要数据。潜在的冲突将通过讨论解决。将使用适当的工具评估单个研究的偏倚风险。将以文字和表格的形式提供综合和解释纳入研究的特征和结果的叙述性综合。由于临床和方法学的异质性,我们不期望进行荟萃分析。将根据 GRADE 系统对护理每个组成部分的累积证据的置信度进行分类。
本系统评价将确定、评估和整合支持接受脊柱手术患者路径的各个组成部分的证据。循证途径的形成将允许在脊柱手术增强康复的背景下标准化临床护理的提供。
PROSPERO CRD42019135289。