• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

项目刺激-反应启动中反应水平的研究-测试一致性

Study-test congruence of response levels in item stimulus-response priming.

作者信息

Gomes Carlos A, Mayes Andrew

机构信息

Memory Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Department of Neuropsychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2020 Jul;48(5):839-855. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01021-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-020-01021-9
PMID:32086755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7320069/
Abstract

We investigated stimulus-response (S-R) memory links during object priming using a binary associative size judgement paradigm. At study, participants decided which of two objects was bigger in real life and, at test, made the same or the reverse judgement. We examined the effects of response congruence on item S-R priming in the associative paradigm. In Experiment 1, a task reversal manipulation had minimal impact on RT priming when classifications were congruent for both recombined objects between study and test. Experiment 2 found that RT priming was more disrupted by classification incongruence of the selected than of the nonselected item alone, with incongruence of the nonselected object having no effect on RTs. Experiment 3, however, found that classification incongruence of both items eliminated RT priming, indicating that a significant effect of classification incongruence for the nonselected item is only evident if both items are classification-incongruent. Finally, across all experiments, we found that accuracy was more sensitive than RTs to decision/action incongruence. We interpret these findings in light of a two-stream account of S-R priming, and suggest a few extensions to account for interactions between S-R links of recombined items.

摘要

我们使用二元关联大小判断范式,研究了物体启动过程中的刺激-反应(S-R)记忆联系。在学习阶段,参与者判断两个物体在现实生活中哪个更大,在测试阶段,做出相同或相反的判断。我们研究了反应一致性对关联范式中项目S-R启动的影响。在实验1中,当学习和测试中两个重组物体的分类一致时,任务反转操作对反应时启动的影响最小。实验2发现,与仅非选择项目的分类不一致相比,选择项目的分类不一致对反应时启动的干扰更大,非选择物体的不一致对反应时没有影响。然而,实验3发现,两个项目的分类不一致消除了反应时启动,这表明只有当两个项目都存在分类不一致时,非选择项目的分类不一致才会产生显著影响。最后,在所有实验中,我们发现准确性比反应时对决策/行动不一致更敏感。我们根据S-R启动的双流理论来解释这些发现,并提出一些扩展来解释重组项目的S-R联系之间的相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/197f260c4f42/13421_2020_1021_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/fb1e6277fade/13421_2020_1021_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/d6934464867b/13421_2020_1021_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/ac9d1342aa18/13421_2020_1021_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/333d1b75b62b/13421_2020_1021_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/bcc7f651d48b/13421_2020_1021_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/197f260c4f42/13421_2020_1021_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/fb1e6277fade/13421_2020_1021_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/d6934464867b/13421_2020_1021_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/ac9d1342aa18/13421_2020_1021_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/333d1b75b62b/13421_2020_1021_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/bcc7f651d48b/13421_2020_1021_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a504/7320069/197f260c4f42/13421_2020_1021_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Study-test congruence of response levels in item stimulus-response priming.项目刺激-反应启动中反应水平的研究-测试一致性
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jul;48(5):839-855. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01021-9.
2
The kinds of information that support novel associative object priming and how these differ from those that support item priming.支持新颖联想物体启动的信息类型,以及这些信息与支持项目启动的信息有何不同。
Memory. 2015;23(6):901-27. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.937722. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
3
Priming for novel object associations: Neural differences from object item priming and equivalent forms of recognition.新异物体关联的启动:与物体项目启动及等效识别形式的神经差异。
Hippocampus. 2016 Apr;26(4):472-91. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22537. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
4
Do stimulus--action associations contribute to repetition priming?刺激-反应联想是否有助于重复启动?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):85-95. doi: 10.1037/a0028479. Epub 2012 May 14.
5
Priming and stimulus-response learning in perceptual classification tasks.知觉分类任务中的启动和刺激-反应学习。
Memory. 2012;20(4):400-13. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.669482. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
6
The item-specific proportion congruency effect can be contaminated by short-term repetition priming.特定项目的比例一致性效应可能会受到短期重复启动的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):1-9. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02403-0. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
7
An attention account of neural priming.神经启动效应的注意账户
Memory. 2017 Jul;25(6):856-864. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1233283. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
8
Sizing up the associative account of repetition priming.评估联想解释的重复启动效应。
Psychol Res. 2010 Jan;74(1):35-49. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0224-9. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
9
Repetition priming in amnesia: Distinguishing associative learning at different levels of abstraction.遗忘症中的重复启动:在不同抽象层次上区分联想学习。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jan;122:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
10
Does long-term object priming depend on the explicit detection of object identity at encoding?长期的客体启动是否依赖于编码时对客体身份的明确检测?
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 20;6:270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00270. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
The neural mechanism of fluency-based memory illusions: the role of fluency context.基于流畅度的记忆错觉的神经机制:流畅度语境的作用。
Learn Mem. 2019 Jan 16;26(2):61-65. doi: 10.1101/lm.048637.118. Print 2019 Feb.
2
How long is long-term priming? Classification and action priming in the scale of days.长期启动有多久?以天数为尺度的分类启动和动作启动。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 May;72(5):1183-1199. doi: 10.1177/1747021818784261. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
3
Behavioural and neural evidence for the impact of fluency context on conscious memory.
流畅性情境对意识记忆影响的行为和神经学证据。
Cortex. 2017 Jul;92:271-288. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
Multiple priming instances increase the impact of practice-based but not verbal code-based stimulus-response associations.多次启动实例会增强基于练习的刺激-反应关联的影响,但不会增强基于言语编码的刺激-反应关联的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 13.
5
Defining stimulus representation in stimulus-response associations formed on the basis of task execution and verbal codes.定义在基于任务执行和言语编码形成的刺激-反应关联中的刺激表征。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jul;82(4):744-758. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0861-y. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
6
The power of words: On item-specific stimulus-response associations formed in the absence of action.言语的力量:论在无动作情况下形成的特定项目刺激-反应关联。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb;43(2):328-347. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000317. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
Multi-level response coding in stimulus-response bindings: Irrelevant distractors retrieve both semantic and motor response codes.刺激-反应联结中的多级反应编码:无关干扰物会检索语义和运动反应代码。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(10):1643-1656. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000264. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
8
Priming for novel object associations: Neural differences from object item priming and equivalent forms of recognition.新异物体关联的启动:与物体项目启动及等效识别形式的神经差异。
Hippocampus. 2016 Apr;26(4):472-91. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22537. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
9
A new look on S-R associations: How S and R link.对刺激-反应关联的新视角:刺激与反应如何联系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Sep;160:161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
10
Retrieval of bindings between task-irrelevant stimuli and responses can facilitate behaviour under conditions of high response certainty.检索任务无关刺激与反应之间的联结能够在高反应确定性条件下促进行为表现。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(3):561-73. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1061567. Epub 2015 Jul 25.