Homo Richelle L, Grigorian Areg, Lekawa Michael, Dolich Matthew, Kuza Catherine M, Doben Andrew R, Gross Ronald, Nahmias Jeffry
Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 333 The City Blvd West, Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868-3298, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Updates Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):547-553. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00727-4. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
Pneumonectomy after traumatic lung injury (TLI) is associated with shock, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, and eventual right ventricular failure. Historically, trauma pneumonectomy (TP) mortality rates ranged between 53 and 100%. It is unclear if contemporary mortality rates have improved. Therefore, we evaluated outcomes associated with TP and limited lung resections (LLR) (i.e., lobectomy and segmentectomy) and aimed to identify predictors of mortality, hypothesizing that TP is associated with greater mortality versus LLR. We queried the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) and performed a multivariable logistic regression to determine the independent predictors of mortality in TLI patients undergoing TP versus LLR. TLI occurred in 287,276 patients. Of these, 889 required lung resection with 758 (85.3%) undergoing LLR and 131 (14.7%) undergoing TP. Patients undergoing TP had a higher median injury severity score (26.0 vs. 24.5, p = 0.03) but no difference in initial median systolic blood pressure (109 vs. 107 mmHg, p = 0.92) compared to LLR. Mortality was significantly higher for TP compared to LLR (64.9% vs 27.2%, p < 0.001). The strongest independent predictor for mortality was undergoing TP versus LLR (OR 4.89, CI 3.18-7.54, p < 0.001). TP continues to be associated with a higher mortality compared to LLR. Furthermore, TP is independently associated with a fivefold increased risk of mortality compared to LLR. Future investigations should focus on identifying parameters or treatment modalities that improve survivability after TP. We recommend that surgeons reserve TP as a last-resort management given the continued high morbidity and mortality associated with this procedure.
创伤性肺损伤(TLI)后行肺切除术与休克、肺血管阻力增加及最终的右心室衰竭相关。从历史上看,创伤性肺切除术(TP)的死亡率在53%至100%之间。目前尚不清楚当代的死亡率是否有所改善。因此,我们评估了与TP及有限肺切除术(LLR,即肺叶切除术和肺段切除术)相关的结局,并旨在确定死亡率的预测因素,假设TP与LLR相比死亡率更高。我们查询了创伤质量改进计划(2010 - 2016年),并进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定接受TP与LLR的TLI患者死亡率的独立预测因素。287276例患者发生了TLI。其中,889例需要进行肺切除术,758例(85.3%)接受LLR,131例(14.7%)接受TP。与LLR相比,接受TP的患者中位损伤严重程度评分更高(26.0对24.5,p = 0.03),但初始中位收缩压无差异(109对107 mmHg,p = 0.92)。与LLR相比,TP的死亡率显著更高(64.9%对27.2%,p < 0.001)。死亡率最强的独立预测因素是接受TP与LLR相比(比值比4.89,可信区间3.18 - 7.54,p < 0.001)。与LLR相比,TP仍然与更高的死亡率相关。此外,与LLR相比,TP独立地与死亡率增加五倍的风险相关。未来的研究应专注于确定可改善TP后生存率的参数或治疗方式。鉴于该手术持续存在的高发病率和死亡率,我们建议外科医生将TP作为最后的治疗手段。