Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burns, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burns, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:656-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.053. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Most traumatic lung injuries are managed non-operatively. There is a paucity of recent data on the outcomes of operatively managed lung injuries. The aim of our study is to determine the survival rates of operatively managed traumatic lung injury patients on a nationwide scale.
We performed a retrospective analysis of the ACS-TQIP 2017-2020. We included all adult trauma patients with lung injuries that underwent operative management. Patients were stratified based on type of surgery into 3 groups (wedge resection, lobectomy, pneumonectomy). The outcome was mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of mortality.
We identified a total of 170,377 patients with lung injuries, out of which 2159 (1.3%) patients underwent operative management (Wedge resection [61%], Lobectomy [31%], Pneumonectomy [8%]). Among operatively managed patients, the mean (SD) age was 37 (16) years, and 86% were male. Overall, 65% sustained penetrating injuries, with a median [IQR] ISS of 25 [16 - 33], and median [IQR] lung injury AIS severity of 4 [3 - 4]. About 7% of the patients suffered hilar injuries. The mean (SD) SBP on arrival was 108 (43) and the median [IQR] time to surgery was 177 [52 - 5351] minutes. The median hospital LOS was 10 [1 - 19] days, and overall mortality rate was 30%. On univariate analysis, patients undergoing pneumonectomy had the highest mortality (54%), followed by lobectomy (33%), and wedge resection (25%). On multivariable regression analysis, hilar injuries (aOR 1.9, 95%CI = 1.06 - 2.80, P = 0.029), increasing age (aOR 1.02, 95%CI = 1.01 - 1.03, P = 0.001), concomitant head (aOR 1.34, 95%CI = 1.22 - 1.47, P < 0.001) and abdominal injuries (aOR 1.42, 95%CI = 1.31 - 1.54, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of mortality.
Nearly 1 in 3 patients with lung injuries who were managed operatively did not survive their index admission. These findings highlight that operatively managed lung injuries still carry a high risk of mortality and should be reserved for selected patients. The decision for surgery in patients with concomitant head or abdominal injuries must be taken on a case-to-case basis.
大多数创伤性肺损伤采用非手术治疗。最近关于手术治疗肺损伤的结果的数据很少。我们的研究目的是确定全国范围内手术治疗创伤性肺损伤患者的生存率。
我们对 ACS-TQIP 2017-2020 进行了回顾性分析。我们纳入了所有接受手术治疗的肺损伤成人创伤患者。根据手术类型将患者分为 3 组(楔形切除术、肺叶切除术、肺切除术)。结果是死亡率。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定死亡率的独立预测因素。
我们共确定了 170377 例肺损伤患者,其中 2159 例(1.3%)患者接受了手术治疗(楔形切除术[61%]、肺叶切除术[31%]、肺切除术[8%])。在手术治疗的患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 37(16)岁,86%为男性。总体而言,65%的患者为穿透性损伤,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)中位数[IQR]为 25[16-33],肺损伤简明损伤评分(AIS)中位数[IQR]为 4[3-4]。约 7%的患者有肺门损伤。入院时平均(SD)收缩压为 108(43),中位(IQR)手术时间为 177[52-5351]分钟。中位住院时间为 10[1-19]天,总死亡率为 30%。单因素分析显示,行肺切除术患者死亡率最高(54%),其次是肺叶切除术(33%)和楔形切除术(25%)。多变量回归分析显示,肺门损伤(比值比[OR] 1.9,95%CI=1.06-2.80,P=0.029)、年龄增长(OR 1.02,95%CI=1.01-1.03,P=0.001)、同时伴有头部(OR 1.34,95%CI=1.22-1.47,P<0.001)和腹部损伤(OR 1.42,95%CI=1.31-1.54,P<0.001)是死亡率的独立预测因素。
近 1/3 接受手术治疗的肺损伤患者在指数入院时未存活。这些发现强调,手术治疗的肺损伤仍然存在高死亡率风险,应保留给选定的患者。对于伴有头部或腹部损伤的患者,是否进行手术必须根据具体情况决定。