General Surgery, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Colorectal Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Mar;90(3):215-221. doi: 10.1111/ans.15775. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
The year 1969 marked a revolution in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). It is when Dr Wolff developed the colonoscope and quickly realized its potential in both diagnosis and treatment of colonic neoplasms. Over the past 50 years there has been exponential increase in utilization of colonoscopy with over 1 million colonoscopies performed annually throughout Australasia. Endoscopic removal of pre-malignant lesions has been proven to reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal. Although timing and frequency of surveillance colonoscopy plays a crucial role in risk reduction of CRC, this is dependent upon the findings of the index colonoscopy. The goal of screening colonoscopy is to detect CRC and identify and remove pre-malignant neoplasms that risk progression to CRC. With increasing uptake of bowel screening throughout Australasia, there is increasing pressure to ensure all endoscopists and endoscopy units perform at a universal high-quality. All too often high demand and constant delays compromise colonoscopy quality. Without clear and concise quality indicators with transparent measurement and audit, these flaws can quickly jeopardize screening goals and patient outcomes. This review aims to explore six key quality indicators and explore the evidence behind the current recommended standards. These key indicators include; rate of adequate bowel preparation, caecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate, withdrawal time, complication rates and surveillance intervals.
1969 年标志着结直肠癌(CRC)诊断的革命。当时,Wolff 博士开发了结肠镜,并迅速意识到其在结肠肿瘤的诊断和治疗中的潜力。在过去的 50 年中,结肠镜的使用呈指数级增长,每年在整个澳大拉西亚进行超过 100 万次结肠镜检查。已经证明,内镜下切除癌前病变可以降低结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率。虽然结肠镜检查的时间和频率对降低 CRC 的风险起着至关重要的作用,但这取决于索引结肠镜检查的结果。筛查结肠镜检查的目的是检测 CRC 并识别和切除有进展为 CRC 风险的癌前肿瘤。随着整个澳大拉西亚肠道筛查的增加,越来越需要确保所有内镜医生和内镜单位都以普遍的高质量水平进行操作。过高的需求和持续的延迟常常会影响结肠镜检查的质量。如果没有明确和简洁的质量指标,以及透明的衡量和审核,这些缺陷可能会迅速危及筛查目标和患者的预后。本综述旨在探讨六个关键质量指标,并探讨当前推荐标准背后的证据。这些关键指标包括:肠道准备充分率、盲肠插管率、腺瘤检出率、退镜时间、并发症发生率和监测间隔。