International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Mar;8(3):e352-e361. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30025-5.
The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) call for stratification of social indicators by ethnic groups; however, no recent multicountry analyses on ethnicity and child survival have been done in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).
We used data from Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys collected between 2010 and 2016, from LMICs that provided birth histories and information on ethnicity or a proxy variable. We calculated neonatal (age 0-27 days), post-neonatal (age 28-364 days), child (age 1-4 years), and under-5 mortality rates (U5MRs) for each ethnic group within each country. We assessed differences in mortality between ethnic groups using a likelihood ratio test, Theil's index, and between-group variance. We used multivariable analyses of U5MR by ethnicity to adjust for household wealth, maternal education, and urban-rural residence.
We included data from 36 LMICs, which included 2 812 381 livebirths among 415 ethnic groups. In 25 countries, significant differences in U5MR by ethnic group were identified (all p<0·05 likelihood ratio test). In these countries, the median mortality ratio between the ethnic groups with the highest and lowest U5MRs was 3·3 (IQR 2·1-5·2; range 1·5-8·5), whereas among the remaining 11 countries, the median U5MR ratio was 1·9 (IQR 1·7-2·5; range 1·4-10·0). Ethnic gaps were wider for child mortality than for neonatal or post-neonatal mortality. In nearly all countries, adjustment for wealth, education, and place of residence did not affect ethnic gaps in mortality, with the exception of Guatemala, India, Laos, and Nigeria. The largest ethnic group did not have the lowest U5MR in any of the countries studied.
Significant ethnic disparities in child survival were identified in more than two-thirds of the countries studied. Regular analyses of ethnic disparities are essential for monitoring trends, targeting, and assessing the impact of health interventions. Such analyses will contribute to the effort towards leaving no one behind, which is at the centre of the SDGs.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UNICEF, Wellcome Trust, Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva.
联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)呼吁按族裔群体对社会指标进行分层;然而,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),最近没有针对族裔和儿童生存问题的多国分析。
我们使用了 2010 年至 2016 年期间在 LMICs 收集的人口与健康调查和多指标类集调查的数据,这些数据提供了出生史以及关于族裔或代理变量的信息。我们为每个国家内的每个族裔计算了新生儿(0-27 天)、晚新生儿(28-364 天)、儿童(1-4 岁)和 5 岁以下儿童死亡率(U5MR)。我们使用似然比检验、希尔指数和组间方差来评估族裔间死亡率的差异。我们使用 U5MR 按族裔的多变量分析来调整家庭财富、母亲教育和城乡居住情况。
我们纳入了 36 个 LMICs 的数据,其中包括 415 个族裔的 2812381 例活产儿。在 25 个国家中,确定了 U5MR 按族裔的显著差异(所有 p<0·05 似然比检验)。在这些国家中,U5MR 最高和最低的族裔之间的中位数死亡率比为 3·3(IQR 2·1-5·2;范围 1·5-8·5),而在其余 11 个国家中,中位数 U5MR 比为 1·9(IQR 1·7-2·5;范围 1·4-10·0)。与新生儿或晚新生儿死亡率相比,儿童死亡率的族裔差距更大。在几乎所有国家中,除了危地马拉、印度、老挝和尼日利亚之外,调整财富、教育和居住地状况并没有影响死亡率方面的族裔差距。在所研究的国家中,最大的族裔并没有在任何国家中拥有最低的 U5MR。
在研究的超过三分之二的国家中,发现了儿童生存方面的显著族裔差异。定期分析族裔差异对于监测趋势、确定目标和评估卫生干预措施的影响至关重要。此类分析将有助于努力实现不让任何人掉队的目标,这是可持续发展目标的核心。
比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会、联合国儿童基金会、惠康信托基金会、巴西公共卫生协会。