Thompson Valerie L, Li Yiting, Liu Yi, Hong Jingyao, Sharma Swati, Metoyer Garyn, Clark-Cutaia Maya N, Purnell Tanjala S, Crews Deidra C, Segev Dorry L, McAdams-DeMarco Mara
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Clin Transplant. 2024 Jul;38(7):e15395. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15395.
Medical distrust may hinder kidney transplantation (KT) access. Among KT candidates evaluated for waitlisting, we identified factors associated with high distrust levels and quantified their association with waitlisting.
Among 812 candidates (2018-2023), we assessed distrust using the Revised Health Care System Distrust Scale across composite, competence, and values subscales. We used linear regression to quantify the associations between candidate and neighborhood-level factors and distrust scores. We used Cox models to quantify the associations between distrust scores and waitlisting.
At KT evaluation, candidates who were aged 35-49 years (difference = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.78-3.16), female (difference = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.23-1.97), and Black (difference = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.47-2.47) were more likely to report higher composite distrust score. For subscales, candidates aged 35-49 were more likely to have higher competence distrust score (difference = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.59-1.68) and values distrust score (difference = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.05-1.61). Race/ethnicity (Black, difference = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.76-2.07; Hispanic, difference = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.35-2.69) was only associated with higher values distrust scores. Female candidates reporting higher rescaled values distrust scores (each one point) had a lower chance of waitlisting (aHR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98), whereas this association was not observed among males. Similarly, among non-White candidates, each 1-point increase in both rescaled composite (aHR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.99) and values (aHR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.99) distrust scores was associated with a lower chance of waitlisting, while there was no association among White candidates.
Female, younger, and non-White candidates reported higher distrust scores. Values distrust may contribute to the long-standing racial/ethnic and gender disparities in access to KT. Implementing tailored strategies to reduce distrust in transplant care may improve KT access for groups that experience persistent disparities.
医疗不信任可能会阻碍肾移植(KT)的机会。在接受等待名单评估的KT候选人中,我们确定了与高度不信任水平相关的因素,并量化了它们与等待名单的关联。
在812名候选人(2018 - 2023年)中,我们使用修订后的医疗保健系统不信任量表,在综合、能力和价值观子量表上评估不信任程度。我们使用线性回归来量化候选人和社区层面因素与不信任得分之间的关联。我们使用Cox模型来量化不信任得分与等待名单之间的关联。
在KT评估中,年龄在35 - 49岁之间的候选人(差异 = 1.97,95%置信区间:0.78 - 3.16)、女性(差异 = 1.10,95%置信区间:0.23 - 1.97)和黑人(差异 = 1.47,95%置信区间:0.47 - 2.47)更有可能报告更高的综合不信任得分。对于子量表,年龄在35 - 49岁之间的候选人更有可能有更高的能力不信任得分(差异 = 1.14,95%置信区间:0.59 - 1.68)和价值观不信任得分(差异 = 0.83,95%置信区间:0.05 - 1.61)。种族/族裔(黑人,差异 = 1.42,95%置信区间:0.76 - 2.07;西班牙裔,差异 = 1.52,95%置信区间:0.35 - 2.69)仅与更高的价值观不信任得分相关。报告更高重新调整后的价值观不信任得分(每增加一分)的女性候选人等待名单的可能性较低(风险比 = 0.78,95%置信区间:0.63 - 0.98),而在男性中未观察到这种关联。同样,在非白人候选人中,重新调整后的综合(风险比 = 0.87,95%置信区间:0.77 - 0.99)和价值观(风险比 = 0.82,95%置信区间:0.68 - 0.99)不信任得分每增加1分,等待名单的可能性就较低,而在白人候选人中则没有关联。
女性、年轻和非白人候选人报告的不信任得分更高。价值观不信任可能导致在获得KT方面长期存在的种族/族裔和性别差异。实施针对性策略以减少对移植护理的不信任可能会改善那些经历持续差异的群体获得KT的机会。