Pergialiotis Vasilios, Bellos Ioannis, Fanaki Maria, Vrachnis Nikolaos, Doumouchtsis Stergios K
Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Apr;247:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
Several studies have investigated the importance of maternal, fetal factors and intrapartum characteristics in predicting severe perineal lacerations. The purpose of the present systematic review is to accumulate current evidence and provide estimated effect sizes for the various risk factors described. We reviewed Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar for published studies in the field for observational studies as well as randomized controlled trials. Two researchers independently assessed the included studies and documented outcomes. Data extraction was performed using a modified data form that was based in Cochrane`s data collection form for intervention reviews for RCTs and non-RCTs. Forty-three articles were selected for inclusion in the present systematic review. The analyzed population reached 716,031 parturient of whom 22,280 (3,1%) sustained third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations. Several risk factors were identified. Instrumental delivery [RR 3.38 (2.21, 5.18)], midline episiotomy [RR 2.88 (1.79, 4.65)] and a persistent occiput posterior position [RR 2.73 (2.08, 3.58)] were associated with the higher risk of developing severe perineal lacerations. Mediolateral episiotomy did not increase, but was also not protective against perineal lacerations [RR 1.55 (0.95, 2.53)]. Several factors contribute to the development of severe perineal lacerations. The present meta-analysis presents accumulated data that may help physicians estimate risks and provide appropriate patient counseling.
多项研究探讨了母体、胎儿因素及分娩期特征在预测严重会阴裂伤方面的重要性。本系统评价的目的是积累当前证据,并为所述各种风险因素提供效应量估计值。我们检索了Medline、Scopus、Clinicaltrials.gov、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库CENTRAL以及谷歌学术,以查找该领域已发表的观察性研究和随机对照试验。两名研究人员独立评估纳入的研究并记录结果。数据提取使用了一种基于Cochrane用于RCT和非RCT干预评价的数据收集表修改而成的数据表。43篇文章被选入本系统评价。分析的人群达716,031名产妇,其中22,280名(3.1%)发生了三度和四度会阴裂伤。确定了几个风险因素。器械助产[相对危险度3.38(2.21,5.18)]、正中会阴切开术[相对危险度2.88(1.79,4.65)]和持续性枕后位[相对危险度2.73(2.08,3.58)]与发生严重会阴裂伤的较高风险相关。侧斜会阴切开术并未增加,但也未预防会阴裂伤[相对危险度1.55(0.95,2.53)]。有几个因素导致严重会阴裂伤的发生。本荟萃分析呈现了积累的数据,可能有助于医生估计风险并为患者提供适当的咨询。