Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Addict Behav. 2020 Jul;106:106356. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106356. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
Black and White adolescents demonstrate different prototypical profiles (i.e., typologies) of substance use, with Blacks demonstrating lower risk for concurrent use of two or more substances. Despite knowledge of these differences, typologies of adolescent substance use identified by person-centered methods, such as latent class analysis, have not characterized profiles by racial group. The current study examined typologies of substance use among Black and White youth separately using person-centered methods to identify common patterns of substance use among subjects. Data were drawn from a 5-year parent study examining adolescent health outcomes. The current study examined high-school aged White (n = 7271, 45.4% male) and Black youth (n = 1301, 40.1% male) who reported past-30-day frequency of cigarette, alcohol, marijuana, inhalant, and other drug use. Latent class analysis was used to examine substance use typologies among each group adjusting for grade and sex. Black and White youth demonstrated different typologies such that four typologies emerged among Blacks: Non-Use (87.8%), Alcohol and Marijuana Use (6.3%), Alcohol, Marijuana, and Cigarette Use (3.8%), and Frequent Polysubstance Use (2.0%). Conversely, five typologies emerged among Whites: Non-Use (73.4%), Predominant Alcohol Use (13.9%), Alcohol, Marijuana, and Cigarette Use (9.4%), Moderate Polysubstance Use (1.6%), and Frequent Polysubstance Use (1.7%). Findings suggest that Black and White youth engage in similar rates of concurrent substance use. Given that Black youth face greater risk for adverse consequences from substance use, prevention efforts are needed to prevent related health disparities related to concurrent substance use.
黑人和白人青少年表现出不同的物质使用典型特征(即类型学),黑人表现出同时使用两种或两种以上物质的风险较低。尽管了解这些差异,但使用基于个体的方法(如潜在类别分析)确定的青少年物质使用类型学尚未按种族群体来描述特征。本研究使用基于个体的方法分别检查了黑人和白人青少年的物质使用类型学,以确定研究对象中物质使用的常见模式。数据来自一项为期 5 年的父母研究,该研究考察了青少年健康结果。本研究考察了报告过去 30 天内香烟、酒精、大麻、吸入剂和其他药物使用频率的高中生白人(n=7271,45.4%为男性)和黑人青少年(n=1301,40.1%为男性)。使用潜在类别分析调整年级和性别后,分别检查了每个群体的物质使用类型学。黑人青少年和白人青少年表现出不同的类型学,因此在黑人青少年中出现了四种类型学:非使用者(87.8%)、酒精和大麻使用者(6.3%)、酒精、大麻和香烟使用者(3.8%)和频繁多物质使用者(2.0%)。相反,在白人青少年中出现了五种类型学:非使用者(73.4%)、主要酒精使用者(13.9%)、酒精、大麻和香烟使用者(9.4%)、中度多物质使用者(1.6%)和频繁多物质使用者(1.7%)。研究结果表明,黑人和白人青少年同时使用物质的比例相似。鉴于黑人青少年面临更大的物质使用不良后果风险,需要开展预防工作,以防止与同时使用物质相关的健康差距。