Skandan Neha, Hochheimer Martin, White Jacob, LeComte Robert S, Pattillo Emma, Huhn Andrew S, Ellis Jennifer D
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Addict Behav. 2025 May;164:108281. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108281. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
Over half of substance use disorder (SUD) cases develop from substance use during adolescence. Studies have used latent class analysis (LCA) to determine adolescent polysubstance use patterns. This systematic review aims to provide an updated characterization of studies that examine patterns of adolescent polysubstance use.
This paper is part of a two-part systematic review examining patterns of polysubstance use. This review focuses on the adolescent literature, which includes study samples with mean age up to 18 years.
A majority of the N=54 studies were conducted in the United States. Sample sizes (N=98 to N=418,702), number of substances used as indicators (3 to 15), and number of latent classes extracted (2 to 6) varied per study. Analyses with larger sample sizes tended to extract a greater number of latent classes (Spearman's rho = .274, p = .022). The mean ages of samples (Spearman's rho = .255, p = .181) nor the utilization of more substances as indicators (Spearman's rho = 0.021, p = .861) were associated with the number of classes extracted. The Bayesian Information Criterion was the most used statistical fit index for the latent classes.
Substantial heterogeneity existed regarding study methodologies, LCA solutions, and statistical measures. Analyses focusing on niche population samples tended to highlight patterns involving less commonly used substances among adolescents. Future studies should expand on the types of substances used as indicators to explore how polysubstance use patterns are influenced by unique geographical communities.
超过半数的物质使用障碍(SUD)病例始于青春期的物质使用。研究已采用潜在类别分析(LCA)来确定青少年多物质使用模式。本系统评价旨在更新对研究青少年多物质使用模式的研究的描述。
本文是一项两部分系统评价的一部分,该评价考察多物质使用模式。本评价聚焦于青少年文献,其中包括平均年龄最高为18岁的研究样本。
N = 54项研究中的大多数在美国进行。样本量(N = 98至N = 418,702)、用作指标的物质数量(3至15种)以及提取的潜在类别数量(2至6个)因研究而异。样本量较大的分析往往提取出更多的潜在类别(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数= 0.274,p = 0.022)。样本的平均年龄(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数= 0.255,p = 0.181)以及用作指标的物质数量更多(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数= 0.021,p = 0.861)均与提取的类别数量无关。贝叶斯信息准则是潜在类别最常用的统计拟合指标。
在研究方法、LCA解决方案和统计测量方面存在大量异质性。关注特定人群样本的分析往往会突出涉及青少年中较少使用物质的模式。未来的研究应扩大用作指标的物质类型,以探索多物质使用模式如何受到独特地理社区的影响。