Vittadello Sean T, McCue Scott W, Gunasingh Gency, Haass Nikolas K, Simpson Matthew J
School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Biophys J. 2020 Mar 24;118(6):1243-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.01.036. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
The go-or-grow hypothesis states that adherent cells undergo reversible phenotype switching between migratory and proliferative states, with cells in the migratory state being more motile than cells in the proliferative state. Here, we examine go-or-grow in two-dimensional in vitro assays using melanoma cells with fluorescent cell-cycle indicators and cell-cycle-inhibiting drugs. We analyze the experimental data using single-cell tracking to calculate mean diffusivities and compare motility between cells in different cell-cycle phases and in cell-cycle arrest. Unequivocally, our analysis does not support the go-or-grow hypothesis. We present clear evidence that cell motility is independent of the cell-cycle phase and that nonproliferative arrested cells have the same motility as cycling cells.
“去或留”假说指出,贴壁细胞在迁移状态和增殖状态之间经历可逆的表型转换,处于迁移状态的细胞比处于增殖状态的细胞更具运动性。在此,我们使用带有荧光细胞周期指示剂和细胞周期抑制药物的黑色素瘤细胞,在二维体外试验中研究“去或留”现象。我们使用单细胞追踪分析实验数据,以计算平均扩散系数,并比较不同细胞周期阶段和细胞周期停滞状态下细胞的运动性。毫无疑问,我们的分析不支持“去或留”假说。我们提供了明确的证据,表明细胞运动性与细胞周期阶段无关,并且非增殖性停滞细胞与循环细胞具有相同的运动性。