Howell A, Mackintosh J, Jones M, Redford J, Wagstaff J, Sellwood R A
CRC Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, U.K.
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988 Oct;24(10):1567-72. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90046-6.
In the criteria used for assessment of response to treatment for advanced breast cancer the definition of no change (NC) is clear; however, there is no indication of the duration of stabilization required for patients to qualify for this category of response. We have made the assumption that NC is a worthwhile category of response if the overall time to progression (TTP) and survival of this group is not significantly different from patients with partial remissions (PR). Two hundred and sixty-three evaluable patients treated with endocrine therapy and 302 evaluable chemotherapy-treated patients were studied and the TTP and survival curves for PR and periods of NC from 1 to 6 months compared. For the endocrine-treated patients the TTP and survival curves for NC became non-significantly different from the PR curves after 4 and 5 months respectively. For chemotherapy-treated patients the TTP curves became non-significantly different from PR at 4 months and for survival the period was 3 months. In order to define NC as a useful category of response and to eliminate the possibility that NC taken for a shorter period could simply represent a slowly progressive tumour, we suggest that the minimum period of disease stabilization be taken as 5 months for both endocrine- and chemotherapy-treated patients.
在用于评估晚期乳腺癌治疗反应的标准中,疾病无变化(NC)的定义很明确;然而,对于患者符合这一反应类别所需的稳定期时长并无说明。我们假设,如果该组患者的总疾病进展时间(TTP)和生存期与部分缓解(PR)的患者没有显著差异,那么NC就是一种有价值的反应类别。我们研究了263例接受内分泌治疗的可评估患者和302例接受化疗的可评估患者,并比较了PR和1至6个月NC期的TTP和生存曲线。对于接受内分泌治疗的患者,NC的TTP和生存曲线分别在4个月和5个月后与PR曲线无显著差异。对于接受化疗的患者,TTP曲线在4个月时与PR无显著差异,生存期方面则是3个月。为了将NC定义为一种有用的反应类别,并消除较短时间的NC可能仅仅代表缓慢进展肿瘤的可能性,我们建议,对于接受内分泌治疗和化疗的患者,疾病稳定的最短时长均为5个月。