Suppr超能文献

固定剂量组合贝美前列素/溴莫尼定/噻吗洛尔治疗青光眼:在巴西进行的一项随机、盲法、对照、III 期研究。

Fixed-combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol in Glaucoma: A Randomized, Masked, Controlled, Phase III Study Conducted in Brazil.

机构信息

Hospital São Paulo, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2020 Feb;42(2):263-275. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Many patients with open-angle glaucoma eventually require >2 medications to lower their intraocular pressure (IOP). Fixed-combination ophthalmic solutions can be advantageous in patients who require multiple medications, but the number of fixed combinations combining 3 complementary IOP-lowering agents remains limited. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a triple fixed combination (TFC) of bimatoprost 0.01%/brimonidine 0.15%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT), compared with a dual fixed combination (DFC) of brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5%.

METHODS

Patients with a baseline IOP of 23-34 mm Hg in both eyes and no history of IOP-lowering procedures were eligible for participation in this multicenter, double-masked, randomized, Phase III study. After washout of previous treatment (if applicable), patients were randomized to receive TFC or DFC twice daily in each eye for 3 months. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in mean IOP in the worse eye at week 12 in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. TFC was superior to DFC if the treatment difference (TFC - DFC) favored TFC at week 12 (P ≤ 0.05; 2-sample t test). Secondary and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Safety, including adverse events, was assessed at all visits.

FINDINGS

The mITT/safety population included 185 patients (TFC, n = 90; DFC, n = 95). TFC superiority was demonstrated at all postbaseline visits (all, P < 0.001) through week 12 (week 12 treatment difference: ─2.17 mm Hg; 95% CI, ─3.12 to ─1.22). While treatment-related conjunctival hyperemia was more frequent with TFC than with DFC (47.8% vs 23.2%; P < 0.001), consistent with the additional presence of bimatoprost in TFC, most cases were mild and the numbers of patient discontinuations at week 12 were similar between the TFC and DFC groups (11 [12.2%] vs 7 [7.4%] patients; P = 0.266). No unexpected adverse events were reported.

IMPLICATIONS

Compared with DFC, TFC provided superior IOP lowering throughout the primary efficacy period. An acceptable tolerability profile was observed through 12 months of use of TFC, offering an effective therapeutic option in patients with POAG or OHT who require multiple medications to control their IOP. Additional studies are required for the assessment of the long-term effects of TFC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01217606.

摘要

目的

许多开角型青光眼患者最终需要>2 种药物来降低眼内压(IOP)。固定剂量组合滴眼液在需要多种药物的患者中可能具有优势,但联合 3 种互补降眼压药物的固定组合数量仍然有限。本研究评估了一种三联合(TFC)贝美前列素 0.01%/溴莫尼定 0.15%/噻吗洛尔 0.5%滴眼液在原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)或高眼压症(OHT)患者中的疗效和安全性,与二联合(DFC)溴莫尼定 0.2%/噻吗洛尔 0.5%相比。

方法

在双眼基线 IOP 为 23-34mmHg 且无 IOP 降低治疗史的患者有资格参加这项多中心、双盲、随机、III 期研究。在洗脱先前治疗(如果适用)后,患者随机接受 TFC 或 DFC 每天两次治疗,持续 3 个月。主要疗效变量是在改良意向治疗(mITT)人群中,在第 12 周时最差眼的平均 IOP 从基线的变化。如果治疗差异(TFC-DFC)在第 12 周时有利于 TFC(P≤0.05;2 样本 t 检验),则认为 TFC 优于 DFC。还进行了次要和敏感性分析。所有就诊时均评估安全性,包括不良事件。

结果

mITT/安全性人群包括 185 名患者(TFC,n=90;DFC,n=95)。在所有随访时间点(所有时间点,P<0.001)至第 12 周,TFC 均表现出优越性(第 12 周治疗差异:-2.17mmHg;95%CI,-3.12 至-1.22)。虽然 TFC 引起的结膜充血比 DFC 更频繁(47.8% vs 23.2%;P<0.001),这与 TFC 中额外存在贝美前列素一致,但大多数病例为轻度,并且在第 12 周时 TFC 和 DFC 组的停药人数相似(11[12.2%] vs 7[7.4%]患者;P=0.266)。未报告任何意外的不良事件。

意义

与 DFC 相比,TFC 在主要疗效期内提供了更好的眼压降低效果。在使用 TFC 12 个月期间观察到可接受的耐受性,为需要多种药物来控制眼压的 POAG 或 OHT 患者提供了有效的治疗选择。需要进一步研究以评估 TFC 的长期效果。临床试验注册号:NCT01217606。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验