Suppr超能文献

大型单中心队列中2003年和2016年舒张功能评估对心血管死亡率的验证与比较

Validation and Comparison of the 2003 and 2016 Diastolic Functional Assessments for Cardiovascular Mortality in a Large Single-Center Cohort.

作者信息

Liang Hsin-Yueh, Lo Yen-Chun, Chiang Hsiu-Yin, Chen Ming-Fong, Kuo Chin-Chi

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital and College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Big Data Center, China Medical University Hospital and College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Apr;33(4):469-480. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.11.013. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognostic performance of the diastolic dysfunction (DD) algorithms published by the Mayo Clinic research group in 2003 and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) in 2016 in association with cardiovascular (CV) mortality was compared in this study.

METHODS

A retrospective hospital cohort comprising 57,630 adults who had undergone comprehensive echocardiographic examinations between 2008 and 2016 was analyzed. All echocardiographic parameters were measured according to appropriate guidelines, and dates of CV death were verified using the national mortality database. The prognostic performance of the Mayo 2003 and ASE/EACVI 2016 algorithms in association with 3-year CV mortality was systematically investigated.

RESULTS

The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for severe DD defined by Mayo 2003 (1.64; 95% CI, 1.02-2.64; P = .04) was less than that defined by ASE/EACVI 2016 (aHR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.58-3.84; P < .001) compared with patients with normal diastolic function. According to the ASE/EACVI 2016 algorithm, the cumulative 3-year CV mortality rate was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.8%-3.0%) for normal diastolic function, 4.7% (95% CI, 4.0%-5.4%) for mild DD, 5.8% (95% CI, 5.0%-6.7%) for moderate DD, 8.3% (95% CI, 6.1%-10.5%) for severe DD, and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.8%-4.8%) for indeterminate DD, respectively (P < .001). The dose-mortality patterns following DD severity were observed only in the ASE/EAVCI 2016 classification. The risk for 3-year CV mortality in patients with concomitant left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% and severe DD was 7 times (aHR, 7.81 [95% CI, 3.81-16.0; P < .05] for Mayo 2003; aHR, 7.67 [95% CI, 4.61-12.8; P < .05] for ASE/EACVI 2016) higher than that in patients with left ventricular ejection fractions ≥ 60% and normal diastolic function. The absolute number of patients who were correctly reclassified by ASE/EAVCI 2016 was 23,181, corresponding to 42% of the absolute net reclassification index.

CONCLUSIONS

DD and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction increased CV mortality risk in a mutually independent manner. The severity of DD on the basis of ASE/EACVI 2016 has a graded relationship with CV mortality in a large population cohort.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了梅奥诊所研究小组于2003年发布的舒张功能障碍(DD)算法以及美国超声心动图学会(ASE)和欧洲心血管影像学会(EACVI)于2016年发布的DD算法与心血管(CV)死亡率的预后表现。

方法

对一个回顾性医院队列进行分析,该队列包括2008年至2016年间接受全面超声心动图检查的57630名成年人。所有超声心动图参数均按照适当指南进行测量,并使用国家死亡率数据库核实CV死亡日期。系统地研究了梅奥2003年和ASE/EACVI 2016年算法与3年CV死亡率的预后表现。

结果

与舒张功能正常的患者相比,梅奥2003年定义的重度DD的调整后风险比(aHR)为1.64(95%CI,1.02 - 2.64;P = 0.04),低于ASE/EACVI 2016年定义的aHR(aHR,2.46;95%CI,1.58 - 3.84;P < 0.001)。根据ASE/EACVI 2016年算法,舒张功能正常者的3年累积CV死亡率为2.4%(95%CI,1.8% - 3.0%),轻度DD为4.7%(95%CI,4.0% - 5.4%),中度DD为5.8%(95%CI,5.0% - 6.7%),重度DD为8.3%(95%CI,6.1% - 10.5%),不确定DD为3.8%(95%CI,2.8% - 4.8%)(P < 0.001)。仅在ASE/EAVCI 2016年分类中观察到DD严重程度与死亡率的剂量 - 反应模式。左心室射血分数<40%且重度DD患者的3年CV死亡风险比左心室射血分数≥60%且舒张功能正常的患者高7倍(梅奥2003年为aHR,7.81[95%CI,3.81 - 16.0;P < 0.05];ASE/EACVI 2016年为aHR,7.67[95%CI,4.61 - 12.8;P < 0.05])。ASE/EAVCI 2016年正确重新分类的患者绝对数为23,181,占绝对净重新分类指数的42%。

结论

DD和左心室射血分数受损以相互独立的方式增加CV死亡风险。基于ASE/EACVI 2016年的DD严重程度与一大群队列中的CV死亡率具有分级关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验