Nazirkar Girish S, Patil Swati Vijay, Shelke Priyanka P, Mahagaonkar Preetam
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, SMBT Dental College and Hospital, Sangamner, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jan-Mar;20(1):83-89. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_218_19. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
The aim of this study is to compare wear of the natural teeth against polished yttrium tetragonal zirconia and polished lithium disilicate crowns.
Experimental type of study.
Polished yttrium tetragonal zirconia and polished lithium disilicate crowns were fabricated and given to 15 patients each (n=15). Crowns were fabricated opposing natural tooth. Patients were recalled after 1year and impression were recorded with opposing arch and baseline and final cast were scanned and superimposed using 3 D scanner.
Data collected by experiments were computerized and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. The normality of the data was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro-Wilk tests. The data were normally distributed. Statistical analysis was done by using tools of descriptive statistics such as Mean, and Standard Deviation for representing quantitative data (enamel wear measured in μm) Parametric tests: Student t-test for intergroup comparison was done.
No statistical difference were found between wear of opposing enamel for polished yttrium tetragonal and polished lithium disiliacte crowns [p=0.446].
Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that polished lithium disilicate showed better clinical outcome than polished yttrium tetragonal zirconia, though the evaluated data was statistically non significant.
本研究旨在比较天然牙与抛光钇稳定四方氧化锆全瓷冠及抛光二硅酸锂全瓷冠之间的磨损情况。
实验性研究。
制作抛光钇稳定四方氧化锆全瓷冠及抛光二硅酸锂全瓷冠,分别给予15例患者(n = 15)。制作的全瓷冠与天然牙相对。1年后召回患者,记录对颌牙弓印模,对基线模型和最终模型进行扫描,并使用三维扫描仪进行叠加。
实验收集的数据进行计算机处理,并使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)16.0版进行分析。使用柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验和夏皮罗-威尔克检验检查数据的正态性。数据呈正态分布。采用描述性统计工具如均值和标准差来表示定量数据(牙釉质磨损以微米为单位测量)进行统计分析,参数检验采用组间比较的学生t检验。
抛光钇稳定四方氧化锆全瓷冠与抛光二硅酸锂全瓷冠相对牙釉质磨损之间未发现统计学差异[p = 0.446]。
在本研究的局限性范围内,可以得出结论,尽管评估数据在统计学上无显著差异,但抛光二硅酸锂全瓷冠比抛光钇稳定四方氧化锆全瓷冠显示出更好的临床效果。