Suppr超能文献

门诊肠外抗菌治疗项目中患者连续输注与间歇输注万古霉素的肾毒性风险及临床疗效

Nephrotoxicity Risk and Clinical Effectiveness of Continuous versus Intermittent Infusion Vancomycin Among Patients in an Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Program.

作者信息

Shakeraneh Pegah, Fazili Tasaduq, Wang Dongliang, Gilotra Tarvinder, Steele Jeffrey M, Seabury Robert W, Miller Christopher D, Darko William, Probst Luke A, Kufel Wesley D

机构信息

State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, New York.

State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2020 Apr;40(4):357-362. doi: 10.1002/phar.2381. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of nephrotoxicity, time to nephrotoxicity onset, and clinical failure among patients who received continuous infusion (C-I) or intermittent infusion (I-I) vancomycin in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine greater than 0.5 mg/dl or a 50% increase from baseline for two consecutive measurements while receiving vancomycin during OPAT. Clinical failure was defined as unplanned readmission, extension of therapy, or change in antibiotics.

DESIGN

Single-center propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

OPAT clinic affiliated with two nearby hospitals.

PATIENTS

We identified 300 patients who received C-I or I-I vancomycin for at least 1 week in the OPAT program between October 1, 2017, and March 31, 2019. Propensity score matching based on age, sex, and infection was performed to minimize differences in patient characteristics between groups.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After propensity score matching and exclusion criteria, 74 patients were included in each cohort. Continuous infusion vancomycin was associated with a 3.22-fold decrease in nephrotoxicity risk (C-I 6.8% [5/74 patients] vs I-I 18.9% [14/74 patients]; odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval 1.10-9.46, p=0.027) and a significantly slower onset to nephrotoxicity compared with I-I (p=0.035). No statistically significant difference in clinical failure rates was observed between the C-I and I-I groups (13.5% [10/74 patients] vs 23.0% [17/74 patients], p=0.147).

CONCLUSION

In an OPAT setting, C-I vancomycin was associated with a lower risk of and slower onset to nephrotoxicity than I-I vancomycin; however, no statistically significant difference in clinical failure rates was observed with C-I versus I-I vancomycin.

摘要

研究目的

比较在门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)项目中接受万古霉素持续输注(C-I)或间歇输注(I-I)的患者的肾毒性发生率、肾毒性发生时间以及临床治疗失败情况。肾毒性定义为在OPAT期间接受万古霉素治疗时,血清肌酐升高超过0.5mg/dl,或较基线水平连续两次测量升高50%。临床治疗失败定义为计划外再次入院、治疗延长或抗生素更换。

设计

单中心倾向评分匹配回顾性队列研究。

地点

隶属于附近两家医院的OPAT诊所。

患者

我们确定了2017年10月1日至2019年3月31日期间在OPAT项目中接受C-I或I-I万古霉素治疗至少1周的300例患者。基于年龄、性别和感染情况进行倾向评分匹配,以尽量减少组间患者特征的差异。

测量指标及主要结果

经过倾向评分匹配和排除标准筛选后,每个队列纳入74例患者。持续输注万古霉素与肾毒性风险降低3.22倍相关(C-I组为6.8%[5/74例患者],I-I组为18.9%[14/74例患者];比值比3.22,95%置信区间1.10 - 9.46,p = 【此处原文有乱码,疑似p = 0.027】),且与I-I组相比,肾毒性发生明显更慢(p = 0.035)。C-I组和I-I组之间的临床治疗失败率无统计学显著差异(分别为13.5%[10/74例患者]和23.0%[17/74例患者],p = 0.147)。

结论

在OPAT环境中,与I-I万古霉素相比,C-I万古霉素的肾毒性风险更低且发生更慢;然而,C-I与I-I万古霉素的临床治疗失败率无统计学显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验