Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Neurol. 2020 May;27(5):741-756. doi: 10.1111/ene.14151. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
Patients with acquired brain injury and acute or prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC) are challenging. Evidence to support diagnostic decisions on coma and other DoC is limited but accumulating. This guideline provides the state-of-the-art evidence regarding the diagnosis of DoC, summarizing data from bedside examination techniques, functional neuroimaging and electroencephalography (EEG).
Sixteen members of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Scientific Panel on Coma and Chronic Disorders of Consciousness, representing 10 European countries, reviewed the scientific evidence for the evaluation of coma and other DoC using standard bibliographic measures. Recommendations followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The guideline was endorsed by the EAN.
Besides a comprehensive neurological examination, the following suggestions are made: probe for voluntary eye movements using a mirror; repeat clinical assessments in the subacute and chronic setting, using the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised; use the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score instead of the Glasgow Coma Scale in the acute setting; obtain clinical standard EEG; search for sleep patterns on EEG, particularly rapid eye movement sleep and slow-wave sleep; and, whenever feasible, consider positron emission tomography, resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), active fMRI or EEG paradigms and quantitative analysis of high-density EEG to complement behavioral assessment in patients without command following at the bedside.
Standardized clinical evaluation, EEG-based techniques and functional neuroimaging should be integrated for multimodal evaluation of patients with DoC. The state of consciousness should be classified according to the highest level revealed by any of these three approaches.
患有后天性脑损伤和急性或持续性意识障碍(DoC)的患者具有挑战性。支持昏迷和其他 DoC 诊断决策的证据有限,但正在积累。本指南提供了关于 DoC 诊断的最新证据,总结了来自床边检查技术、功能神经影像学和脑电图(EEG)的数据。
代表 10 个欧洲国家的 16 名欧洲神经病学学会(EAN)昏迷和慢性意识障碍科学小组的成员使用标准文献措施审查了评估昏迷和其他 DoC 的科学证据。建议遵循推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)系统。该指南得到了 EAN 的认可。
除了全面的神经系统检查外,还提出了以下建议:使用镜子探测自愿眼球运动;在亚急性和慢性环境中使用昏迷恢复量表修订版重复临床评估;在急性环境中使用全面无反应评分代替格拉斯哥昏迷量表;获得临床标准脑电图;在脑电图上寻找睡眠模式,特别是快速眼动睡眠和慢波睡眠;并且,只要可行,考虑正电子发射断层扫描、静息状态功能磁共振成像(fMRI)、主动 fMRI 或 EEG 范式以及高密度 EEG 的定量分析,以补充床边无指令患者的行为评估。
应整合标准化临床评估、基于脑电图的技术和功能神经影像学,以对 DoC 患者进行多模态评估。意识状态应根据这三种方法中任何一种方法揭示的最高水平进行分类。