Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy.
Acta Oncol. 2020 May;59(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1730001. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
To compare radiation-induced toxicity and dosimetry parameters in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANPC) treated with a mixed-beam (MB) approach (IMRT followed by proton therapy boost) with an historic cohort of patients treated with a full course of IMRT-only. Twenty-seven patients with LANPC treated with the MB approach were compared to a similar cohort of 17 patients treated with IMRT-only. The MB approach consisted in a first phase of IMRT up to 54-60 Gy followed by a second phase delivered with a proton therapy boost up to 70-74 Gy (RBE). The total dose for patients treated with IMRT-only was 69.96 Gy. Induction chemotherapy was administrated to 59 and 88% and concurrent chemoradiotherapy to 88 and 100% of the MB and IMRT-only patients, respectively. The worst toxicity occurring during the entire course of treatment (acute toxicity) and early-late toxicity were registered according to the Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events V4.03. The two cohorts were comparable. Patients treated with MB received a significantly higher median total dose to target volumes ( = .02). Acute grade 3 mucositis was found in 11 and 76% ( = .0002) of patients treated with MB and IMRT-only approach, respectively, while grade 2 xerostomia was found in 7 and 35% ( = .02) of patients treated with MB and IMRT-only, respectively. There was no statistical difference in late toxicity. Local progression-free survival (PFS) and progression-free survival curves were similar between the two cohorts of patients ( = .17 and = .40, respectively). Local control rate was 96% and 81% for patients treated with MB approach and IMRT-only, respectively. Sequential MB approach for LANPC patients provides a significantly lower acute toxicity profile compared to full course of IMRT. There were no differences in early-late morbidities and disease-related outcomes (censored at two-years) but a longer follow-up is required to achieve conclusive results.
比较采用混合束(MB)方法(调强放疗后质子治疗推量)治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌(LANPC)的患者与仅接受全程调强放疗(IMRT)治疗的历史队列患者的辐射诱导毒性和剂量学参数。将 27 例采用 MB 方法治疗的 LANPC 患者与 17 例仅接受 IMRT 治疗的相似队列患者进行比较。MB 方法包括第一阶段的 IMRT,剂量达到 54-60Gy,然后进行第二阶段质子治疗推量,剂量达到 70-74Gy(RBE)。仅接受 IMRT 治疗的患者的总剂量为 69.96Gy。59%和 88%的患者接受了诱导化疗,88%和 100%的患者接受了同期放化疗。根据通用不良事件术语标准 4.03 版(Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events V4.03),记录了整个治疗过程中发生的最严重毒性(急性毒性)和早晚期毒性。两个队列具有可比性。接受 MB 治疗的患者靶区接受的中位总剂量明显更高( = .02)。接受 MB 和 IMRT 治疗的患者急性 3 级黏膜炎发生率分别为 11%和 76%( = .0002),2 级口干发生率分别为 7%和 35%( = .02)。晚期毒性无统计学差异。两组患者的局部无进展生存率(PFS)和无进展生存率曲线相似( = .17 和 = .40)。接受 MB 治疗和仅接受 IMRT 治疗的患者局部控制率分别为 96%和 81%。对于 LANPC 患者,采用序贯 MB 方法治疗可显著降低急性毒性。早晚期发病率和疾病相关结局(以两年为截尾)无差异,但需要更长的随访时间才能得出结论性结果。