Ko Mincheol, Yang Kyungmi, Ahn Yong Chan, Ju Sang Gyu, Oh Dongryul, Kim Yeong-Bi, Kwon Dong Yeol, Park Seyjoon, Lee Kisung
Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Department of Bio-Convergence Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 5;16(19):3402. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193402.
Proton therapy requires caution when treating patients with targets near neural structures. Intuitive and quantitative guidelines are needed to support decision-making concerning the treatment modality. This study compared dosimetric profiles of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT) for adaptive re-planning in cT3-4 nasopharyngeal cancer (NPCa) patients, aiming to establish criteria for selecting appropriate treatment modalities.
HT and IMPT plans were generated for 28 cT3-4 NPCa patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy. Dosimetric comparisons were performed for target coverage and high-priority organs at risk (OARs). The correlation between dosimetric parameters and RT modality selection was analyzed with the target OAR distances.
Target coverages were similar, while IMPT achieved better dose spillage. HT was more favorable for brainstem D, optic chiasm D, optic nerves D, and p-cord D. IMPT showed advantages for oral cavity D. Actually, 14 IMPT and 14 HT plans were selected as adaptive plans, with IMPT allocated to most cT3 patients (92.9% vs. 42.9%, = 0.013). The shortest distances from the target to neural structures were negatively correlated with OAR doses. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were carried out to discover the optimal cut-off values of the shortest distances between the target and the OARs (temporal lobes and brainstem), which were 0.75 cm (AUC = 0.908, specificity = 1.00) and 0.85 cm (AUC = 0.857, specificity = 0.929), respectively.
NPCa patients with cT4 tumor or with the shortest distance between the target and critical neural structures < 0.8 cm were suboptimal candidates for IMPT adaptive re-planning. These criteria may improve resource utilization and clinical outcomes.
在治疗靶区靠近神经结构的患者时,质子治疗需要谨慎。需要直观且定量的指南来支持有关治疗方式的决策。本研究比较了调强质子治疗(IMPT)和使用螺旋断层放疗(HT)的调强放射治疗(IMRT)在cT3-4期鼻咽癌(NPCa)患者适应性重新计划中的剂量分布,旨在建立选择合适治疗方式的标准。
为28例接受根治性放疗的cT3-4期NPCa患者生成HT和IMPT计划。对靶区覆盖和高优先级危及器官(OARs)进行剂量学比较。分析剂量学参数与放疗方式选择之间的相关性以及靶区与OARs的距离。
靶区覆盖率相似,而IMPT的剂量溢出情况更好。HT对脑干D、视交叉D、视神经D和脊髓D更有利。IMPT在口腔D方面具有优势。实际上,14个IMPT和14个HT计划被选为适应性计划,IMPT分配给大多数cT3患者(92.9%对42.9%,P = 0.013)。靶区到神经结构的最短距离与OARs剂量呈负相关。进行了受试者操作特征曲线分析,以发现靶区与OARs(颞叶和脑干)之间最短距离的最佳截断值,分别为0.75 cm(AUC = 0.908,特异性 = 1.00)和0.85 cm(AUC = 0.857,特异性 = 0.929)。
cT4期肿瘤或靶区与关键神经结构之间最短距离<0.8 cm的NPCa患者不是IMPT适应性重新计划的最佳候选者。这些标准可能会提高资源利用率和临床结果。